|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The concept could get very complicated with Hall of Famers, Southern Leaguers, different backs and different grades, etc, etc, etc. I wanted to keep it simple enough to get quick responses not requiring a calculator. I considered the PSA weighting system, but found it a bit to complicated for a quick answer and weighting Wagner a 10 just isn't fair. My other goal was to have a maximum score of 1000, which has not yet been reported. The thread seems to be getting a good response and your input is appreciated. Merry Christmas to all. Frank |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The above would be simple. Adding back multipliers would make it difficult for some board members to do the math. In any event, your thread is fun, but if you really want to tabulate results, you need to make it more realistic.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Monster? Really? | DanP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 07-05-2011 07:20 PM |
Most home runs by number | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-14-2008 07:12 PM |
Irrational Exuberance Low Number High Grade 1933 Goudeys | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 241 | 09-23-2007 09:19 AM |
Using a PSA number to find out about a card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-10-2007 09:21 AM |
PSA Certification Number Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-04-2006 04:38 AM |