|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I never knew that was a possibility. What do suspect would be the reason for not getting a # grade? I'll update with results when I get the card back but it won't be for about another month.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I believe the holder damages the card stock and PSA always returns them as (ALTERED STOCK).
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I did some quick research after you told me about this and it seems like PSA considers it altered stock because the pressure from the screw down holder flattens out the cardboard stock which they consider altered. Hopefully since this is more of a paper stock and not a cardboard stock it won't be flattened out by the screw-down.
Last edited by TobaccoKing4; 04-10-2017 at 08:26 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I would not worry about the altered stock because it is such a thin card to begin with. That is more for regular cards that have been smashed for several years(decades). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I think it'll be just fine. Probably not a 9 but fine anyway. I've sent a few in in toploaders which they also don't like, since I don't use cardsavers and have to save them up from stuff I bought. Didn't have a problem, and didn't get the toploaders back. Not a big deal since they were also used ones with old price stickers, yellowing etc.
I didn't send any in in the toploader/mylar sleeve combo, as the mylar had sealed itself to the toploaders and I had to cut the card out. Figured that would really bug them as it was a lot of extra work. Steve B |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I'm hoping this brick was not recessed. Otherwise that could put surface impressions in your card. I would kind of expect a 92 SGC 8.5 for this card, if the top right corner has the feathering it sort of looks like to me, and the nick on the top left side is just a scratch on the screwdown.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
You might get one (92) but odds aren't in your favor. Cross your fingers.
__________________
Leon Luckey Last edited by Leon; 04-11-2017 at 10:22 AM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I'm hoping you're wrong but I'm sure you are more experienced with grading than I am so you're probably right. I do think the card looks sharper and better in person than what shows on the scan though.
Last edited by TobaccoKing4; 04-11-2017 at 01:13 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Let us know, it should be interesting. I am hoping you are correct. They do give out high grades but they seem to be to others and not me!!
__________________
Leon Luckey |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vintage and PSA's grading consistency over time | the 'stache | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 14 | 04-18-2016 08:47 PM |
How on-time are grading companies? | granite75 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-04-2014 07:39 AM |
First time SGC submitter question. | Mrvintage | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-17-2013 08:24 PM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
first time I have seen this grading company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-07-2003 08:20 PM |