 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-20-2012, 07:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Portraits vs. baseball poses
I don't know why the hobby (generally) values the T206 portraits more than the baseball poses; the latters' athleticism, varied backgrounds and pastel colors are so much more attractive and interesting to me. I understand that many of the classic T206 portraits are based on Carl Horner original studio photographs and that can, in part, account for the differences in value. But how can you beat the aesthetics of these four? Personally, I wouldn't trade them straight-up for equivalently-graded portraits of Lajoie, Cobb, Crawford (even if he had a portrait!) and Waddell (...and I know that beauty is in the eye of the beholder!)
I'd be interested to hear others' thoughts and differing perspectives.    
Last edited by paleocards; 08-20-2012 at 07:50 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vintage Baseball Coins and Pins For Sale | weedene | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 05-15-2012 11:19 AM |
| 1956 Topps Baseball Pins | weedene | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-26-2012 10:38 AM |
| Rare 1938 Baseball Tabs For Sale | weedene | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 03-26-2012 10:08 AM |
| History of the 19th Century baseball to 1872 | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 04-23-2010 03:55 PM |
| A short baseball story for your reading enjoyment | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-20-2004 06:50 PM |
Threaded Mode