T206 350/460 series (illustrated) and why certain T-brands are mutually-exclusive

[tedzan]

[QUOTE=Pat R;1607544]

No Ted nobody put me up to posting this.

There is no doubt that you have done a lot of research on this set but for
me it is negated by the fact that you can't admit when you make a "mistake".

Hey folks....if some one posts critical comments about you today that are identical to what you've heard from some one else 8 years ago, what is the probability
of this occurrence being just coincidental ? The probability is some where between 100,000 - Million to 1.

So....knowing you have a connection to that other party....you are not being truthful.

OK, you want to talk about mistakes....I admitted 8 years ago that I made on some of those T206 front/back cards. We were all still learning about The Monster.

And, what is more important is that my subsequent research resulted in significant information that is presented in this thread to Net54 members who appreciate
all this "nitty-gritty" stuff regarding T206's.

So, let's discuss your mistakes starting with this thread......in posts #45 and #47 you posted images of 460-only series subjects (Howell, Bergen, Overall, Murray)
that DO NOT pertain to the 350/460 series cards that this thread is devoted to. It is a distraction in the subject matter being discussed here.

If you want to talk 460-only series cards, why not simply start another thread.


TED Z
.

[Pat R]

[QUOTE=tedzan;1607576]

Originally Posted by Pat R

Hey folks....if some one posts critical comments about you today that are identical to what you've heard from some one else 8 years ago, what is the probability
of this occurrence being just coincidental ? The probability is some where between 100,000 - Million to 1.

So....knowing you have a connection to that other party....you are not being truthful.
OK, you want to talk about mistakes....I admitted 8 years ago that I made on some of those T206 front/back cards. We were all still learning about The Monster.

And, what is more important is that my subsequent research resulted in significant information that is presented in this thread to Net54 members who appreciate
all this "nitty-gritty" stuff regarding T206's.

So, let's discuss your mistakes starting with this thread......in posts #45 and #47 you posted images of 460-only series subjects (Howell, Bergen, Overall, Murray)
that DO NOT pertain to the 350/460 series cards that this thread is devoted to. It is a distraction in the subject matter being discussed here.

If you want to talk 460-only series cards, why not simply start another thread.


TED Z
.

Well this statement is ironic Ted. I have been truthful, no one influenced what
I have said and frankly I don't care if you believe me . I'm sure
it's similar to what a few other members have posted in the past because it's
based on facts, you have said you owned cards that are no prints and when
confronted about them you continue to lie about it.

Now how about being truthful about the Snodgrass.

[tedzan]

[QUOTE=Pat R;1607608]

Originally Posted by tedzan

Well this statement is ironic Ted. I have been truthful, no one influenced what
I have said and frankly I don't care if you believe me . I'm sure
it's similar to what a few other members have posted in the past because it's
based on facts, you have said you owned cards that are no prints and when
confronted about them you continue to lie about it.

Now how about being truthful about the Snodgrass.

Hey Pat

1st....I had Street (catching) mistakenly identified as Snodgrass (catching).

OK, I made an honest mistake....give me a break !

And, I don't believe you, Pat. You heard that "B-S" from your buddy, and you know it.

Can we now get back to Dec 2016....instead of harping on some thing in Nov 2008. This "B-S" of your's is insane (it's sick). ! !


TED
.

[Gradedcardman]

Ted,

I would love to see a scan of the 460's you have put together. I am going after the no frames now as well. Needed a new conquest after almost being done with the PD 42's (lacking 1 based on my calculations).

[tedzan]

Originally Posted by Gradedcardman

Ted,

I would love to see a scan of the 460's you have put together. I am going after the no frames now as well. Needed a new conquest after almost being done with the PD 42's (lacking 1 based on my calculations).

Hello Adam

Sixty-six of my AB 460 cards can be seen in this thread I started 4 years ago titled......" Show off your AMERICAN BEAUTY's....T205's and/or T206's ".
Check-it-out......http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=158706


Please email me....I have some thing interesting to tell you.

tedzan11@comcast.net


TED Z
__________________________________________________ _____________________________________
LOOKING for these 4 - T206 guys to complete my AMERICAN BEAUTY 460 sub-set (74 cards)

CAMNITZ (hands over head)....DOYLE (portrait)....McGRAW (portrait-cap)....TINKER (bat off shoulder)
.

[tedzan]

Deleted
.

[tedzan]

While the Black LENOX "connection" is still a work in progress, the 17 confirmed Brown LENOX cards (to date) indicate a definite trend they are exclusively from Group B.

Group B





350/460 series Brown LENOX......17 subjects (to date) confirmed

Bradley (bat)
Burch (fielding)
Cobb (bat off shoulder)
Conroy (bat)
Jordan (bat)
Lajoie (bat)
Lake (no ball)
Leach (cap)
Leifield (bat)
Manning (pitching)
McQuillan (bat)
Overall (yellow sky)
Pfeister (throwing)
F. Smith (Chicago & Boston)
Wagner (bat on right shoulder)
Willetts
Willis (bat)

If this trend continues, eventually I expect that we will discover the remaining 11 subjects from Group B with Brown LENOX backs.

I would appreciate your inputs regarding this subject.

Thanks,

TED Z
.