My exceptional PWCC pickup.

[pokerplyr80]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Honestly, if you have blinders on, I am not wasting time talking to you Jesse. PWCC ADMITTED it. End of discussion. Have a nice day.

That may be true, but I didn't see that post.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80

That may be true, but I didn't see that post.

Then perhaps you should read what's out there before making pronouncements about the state of the evidence?

[calvindog]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Then perhaps you should read what's out there before making pronouncements about the state of the evidence?

Why? If you don't read it that means it never happened.

[bobbyw8469]

Originally Posted by calvindog

Why? If you don't read it that means it never happened.

Are you always this cynical?

[calvindog]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

Are you always this cynical?

Occupational hazard.

[pokerplyr80]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Then perhaps you should read what's out there before making pronouncements about the state of the evidence?

I believe my only pronouncement was that I hadn't seen any evidence, not exactly a groundbreaking revelation.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80

I believe my only pronouncement was that I hadn't seen any evidence, not exactly a groundbreaking revelation.

It implied that it was your assessment of the evidence we've all been discussing.

[pokerplyr80]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

It implied that it was your assessment of the evidence we've all been discussing.

What I've seen was a statement that the 52 Mantle appeared to have been altered based on before and after pictures posted on blowout. I saw no evidence they knew this card was altered before posting it. Or that whatever was done to that card even meets PSA's definition of alteration.

I don't remember the whole story with that 36 DiMaggio, but I do remember it didn't look good.

I am completely unaware if there is evidence that they knew of any other altered cards submitted in their auctions. I stated to Jeff that if he knew something I didn't, I'd like to see it. I still would.

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80

What I've seen was a statement that the 52 Mantle appeared to have been altered based on before and after pictures posted on blowout. I saw no evidence they knew this card was altered before posting it. Or that whatever was done to that card even meets PSA's definition of alteration.

I don't remember the whole story with that 36 DiMaggio, but I do remember it didn't look good.

I am completely unaware if there is evidence that they knew of any other altered cards submitted in their auctions. I stated to Jeff that if he knew something I didn't, I'd like to see it. I still would.

You’re an idiot

[Fuddjcal]

How about you just simply open your eyes?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80

What I've seen was a statement that the 52 Mantle appeared to have been altered based on before and after pictures posted on blowout. I saw no evidence they knew this card was altered before posting it. Or that whatever was done to that card even meets PSA's definition of alteration.

I don't remember the whole story with that 36 DiMaggio, but I do remember it didn't look good.

I am completely unaware if there is evidence that they knew of any other altered cards submitted in their auctions. I stated to Jeff that if he knew something I didn't, I'd like to see it. I still would.

If you read what everyone else has read, you would be aware. If you aren't going to, you shouldn't opine. If you have read and still think there is no evidence, I don't even know what to say at this point.

[calvindog]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

If you read what everyone else has read, you would be aware. If you aren't going to, you shouldn't opine. If you have read and still think there is no evidence, I don't even know what to say at this point.

Brent admitted the Mantle was worked on prior to it being sold by him. Now Jesse is claiming that Brent is lying?