 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-19-2013, 06:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Setting Definitions for Rarity of Cards
Perhaps in the industry we should have a common definition of "rare" - for pre-war, under 1,000? examples - for post-war, under 10,000?. and then perhaps a common definition of "ultra scarce" - for pre-war, under 100? - for post-war, under 1,000? and then perhaps a "handful" for pre-war under 10, and post-war under 100? Trying to assign numerical value to terms I think would be an interesting idea.
Becomes a little more interesting with T-206 of course as a Frank Chance T-206 may not be rare, but one with a particular back might be. Ideas/views with regard to setting terms for number of examples that survive? Best, J 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rarity of Shonen/Youth's Companion Ruth cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-04-2008 10:24 PM |
| Is anyone setting up at the National. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 07-24-2007 05:57 PM |
| Grading cards--setting the value | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-04-2007 02:34 PM |
| The commonness of rare cards is less perplexing than the rarity of common ones | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 07-15-2006 07:08 PM |
| condition rarity in e cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 06-02-2005 11:24 PM |
Threaded Mode