 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
10-09-2017, 09:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
High res scans would tell me a lot.
Sometimes wear is hard to tell because of how variable the inking levels were. I could probably tell if the last version was an attempted repair. Someday I'll have to draw some pics explaining wear and inking to show how similar they can be. (And impression pressure, and the wetting of the stone/plate and ....... Steve B 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: group of 6 EPDG commons | trobba | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 10-22-2014 10:00 AM |
| Evidence of trimming? | bobbvc | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 04-05-2014 09:44 PM |
| Evidence of E90-1 being printed before E102 | CaramelMan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 08-24-2013 05:40 PM |
| The Evidence as Promised | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-01-2008 07:02 PM |
| Were T206's printed on sheets of 48 Subjects ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 64 | 04-27-2007 08:50 AM |
Threaded Mode