NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-17-2015, 12:58 PM
bbcardzman's Avatar
bbcardzman bbcardzman is offline
E®© Eńlø
member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Home of the 11-Time World Champion St. Louis Cardinals
Posts: 147
Default Older Graded Cards

I am not really into graded cards much so I don't know much about it, but are there special considerations given to older cards regarding the grading scale? Why do I see cards graded EX with a crease in them? I thought that EX meant no creases. And when you get to Poor and Fair grades, it's just a toss up. And it isn't just the oddball grading companies, because I see a lot in PSA holders also. Are these some of the first graded cards ever done? Are the people who grade them getting tired from grading so many? Or are they getting too old to see anymore? Any ideas?
__________________
I collect Cardinals cards for team sets from all years.
My want & trade lists are on my website here: http://bbcardzman.webs.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-17-2015, 01:02 PM
4815162342's Avatar
4815162342 4815162342 is online now
Daryl
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,264
Default Older Graded Cards

Search this forum and you will find this and other similar topics discussed 87 million times.

Last edited by 4815162342; 06-17-2015 at 01:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-17-2015, 01:06 PM
pclpads pclpads is offline
Dave Foster
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: left coast
Posts: 965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4815162342 View Post
Search this forum and you will find this and other similar topics discussed 87 million times.
I think the last count was at 88M.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-17-2015, 06:25 PM
nolemmings's Avatar
nolemmings nolemmings is offline
Todd Schultz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,737
Default

I believe there are slight considerations given to older cards by TPGs, whether they admit it or not, but no, a card graded EX from any era should not have a crease, just as most would agree that a card with paper loss should not grade higher than fair. Sure you can get into eye appeal to either bolster or tear down a particular card's grade, but from a technical grade standpoint, those two flaws should knock the card down to a max grade of 4 and 1.5, respectively.

Yes it is generally believed that the first-graded cards were given more generous numbers and yes it is surely possible a grader had a long or bad day when looking at a specific card (as well as just plain making a mistake). More nefarious explanations might be at play from time to time as well, such as graders giving favorite submitters inflated grades or certain cards having been spooned or creases pressed out, later to have these defects reappear (supposedly).
__________________
If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other. - Ulysses S. Grant, military commander, 18th US President.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-18-2015, 04:32 AM
Joshchisox08's Avatar
Joshchisox08 Joshchisox08 is offline
J0$H B^ck!ey
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: C0nn3cticu+
Posts: 1,943
Default ..

Quote:
Originally Posted by bbcardzman View Post
I am not really into graded cards much so I don't know much about it, but are there special considerations given to older cards regarding the grading scale? Why do I see cards graded EX with a crease in them? I thought that EX meant no creases. And when you get to Poor and Fair grades, it's just a toss up. And it isn't just the oddball grading companies, because I see a lot in PSA holders also. Are these some of the first graded cards ever done? Are the people who grade them getting tired from grading so many? Or are they getting too old to see anymore? Any ideas?
I think PSA could fall under Odball as well as much as they're looked at as the "head-honchos" of grading (by some) I think it's a toss up with them. You can get the oddest of grades from that company.

SGC IMO is the best and far more consistent.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81%
49/76 HOF's 64%
18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90%
22/39 Unique Backs 56%
80/86 Minors 93%
25/48 Southern Leaguers 52%
6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60%

237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW

Excel spreadsheets only $5
T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!!

Checklists sold (20)

T205 8/208 3.8%
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-18-2015, 04:35 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nolemmings View Post
I believe there are slight considerations given to older cards by TPGs, whether they admit it or not, but no, a card graded EX from any era should not have a crease, just as most would agree that a card with paper loss should not grade higher than fair. Sure you can get into eye appeal to either bolster or tear down a particular card's grade, but from a technical grade standpoint, those two flaws should knock the card down to a max grade of 4 and 1.5, respectively.

Yes it is generally believed that the first-graded cards were given more generous numbers and yes it is surely possible a grader had a long or bad day when looking at a specific card (as well as just plain making a mistake). More nefarious explanations might be at play from time to time as well, such as graders giving favorite submitters inflated grades or certain cards having been spooned or creases pressed out, later to have these defects reappear (supposedly).
Also, bear in mind a full blown crease is much different from a spider wrinkle. A lot of collectors seem to confuse the two.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-19-2015, 07:37 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,341
Default

Some grading standards within the TPGs change a little over time. A card with a crease (goes through front and back) shouldn't generally (if ever) be EX. One with a spider wrinkle (only goes through one side) could possibly receive an EX. You just have to get to know the TPGs and their idiosyncrasies. Sometimes an earlier graded card can be a stricter grade sometimes a more lenient grade. Buy the TPG not the time frame . (or was it buy the card.......)
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-20-2015, 09:56 PM
bbcardzman's Avatar
bbcardzman bbcardzman is offline
E®© Eńlø
member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Home of the 11-Time World Champion St. Louis Cardinals
Posts: 147
Default

Thanks everyone - great info as always.
__________________
I collect Cardinals cards for team sets from all years.
My want & trade lists are on my website here: http://bbcardzman.webs.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-21-2015, 05:03 AM
mrvster mrvster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,294
Default josh....

+ 1 SGC are the shit
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Older Topps + OPC Baseball unopened BBCE PSA graded! tsalem 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T 1 06-24-2014 04:39 PM
Are Older SGC Graded Cards Valued Less? wazoo Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 30 12-28-2013 07:03 AM
Show your (older) Giants cards 90feetaway Football Cards Forum 5 03-10-2012 05:00 AM
3000-4000 or more older cards Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 1 05-04-2008 05:59 PM
hey, our cards are a year older! Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 4 01-02-2005 10:49 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:46 PM.


ebay GSB