|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Jason, Re: Rose, you’re actually not correct.
One of the rules for election consideration on the Hall of Fame’s website is this: “Any player on Baseball's ineligible list shall not be an eligible candidate.” Last edited by MVSNYC; 11-28-2017 at 04:00 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Those two things are only tied together because of a rule set by the BBHOF. If they wanted, they could eliminate that rule and put Pete on the ballot. So the BBHOF is in control.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-2) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1954 Bowman (-5) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
This doesn't change the fact that the HOF makes their own rules. They are not controlled by MLB. Pete Rose, Shoeless Joe, etc., could all be made eligible by the Hall by removing this statute, regardless of whether or nt their ban from baseball is upheld. Conversely, MLB could reinstate Rose, and the Hall still decide not to put him on the ballot. They are a totally separate entity.
__________________
****Southern League**** Old Mill (SL) PSA 3: 3/48 Old Mill (SL) PSA 4: 5/48 Hindu Brown: 1/34 ****NY Highlanders Team Set**** Basic Team Set: 13/28 Master Team Set: 13/315 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hall of Fame | bobfreedman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-13-2015 03:37 PM |
If there was no Hall of Fame..... | alanu | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 12-05-2011 11:56 PM |
Who needs the Hall of Fame anyway?! | 53Browns | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 06-13-2011 10:41 PM |
Hall of Fame | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-07-2007 04:02 PM |
Hall of Fame | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 09-21-2001 07:17 PM |