 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-30-2011, 03:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
T206 back condition question
Which is better (or worse) regarding condition; back with paper loss from being adhered in album or back with adhered paper from album? I have one of each El Principe de Gales back.
Last edited by bunst; 04-30-2011 at 03:29 PM. 
|
|
#2
04-30-2011, 05:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
in my mind, paper loss is worse. With the paper still on it, it carries a promise that it could be removed without harming the card. The one with paperloss doesn't have any hope. Also, the +paper one has a bit of history still intact.
Last edited by Jaybird; 04-30-2011 at 06:23 PM. Reason: correcting grammar
|
|
#3
04-30-2011, 06:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
05-01-2011, 10:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
me too
I would prefer a card with a remnant as opposed to paper loss. I would then spend the rest of my time above ground figuring out how to get said remnant off
 .
__________________
Leon Luckey
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 Carl Lundgren Chicago Back question | cobblove | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-28-2010 07:06 PM |
| T206 Doyle N.Y. w Sov 350 Back for Trade | T206Collector | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 07-02-2010 07:30 AM |
| m116 - "300 Subjects" back question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-28-2008 11:19 AM |
| T206 Back Collecting | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 12-14-2005 04:44 PM |
| T206 condition question...Need help | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-28-2005 01:20 PM |
Linear Mode
