Only if it was real lol

[Iron Horse]

http://www.ebay.com/itm/261221704932...84.m1438.l2649

[HRBAKER]

Hey it's certed by the Sure Sucks Grading Authority.

[rdwyer]

Severe bad damage = VG 3 ??? If only they had a brain.

[Prof_Plum]

Sad thing is that even if he sells it as a reprint, he'll probably get people to bid >$500

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1952-TOPPS-3...p2047675.l2557

[quinnsryche]

Gotta admit, the back damage is a nice touch. Gives it that sense of realism missing in so many other bullshit graded reprint scams.

[Sean]

Nice disclaimer, the grading sevice is out of business and sold as is.

[sportscollector]

that's one of the nicer fake ruth rookies I have seen card actually looks kond of real in the scan

[SetBuilder]

I'm placing my order for a plastic slabbing machine and vintage paper stock right now.

[rdwyer]

Losing winner o***h( 357) US $364.99

What an idiot!

[GasHouseGang]

So this seller sold an "apparently" fake Ruth, and 1952 Topps Mantle in those weird grading company holders. But if you look at his completed auctions he also sold a raw 1949 Leaf Spahn, a raw 1949 Leaf Musial, and a raw 1968 Ryan rookie. This guy has a 100% feedback and his raw items look legit. Does anyone have an opinion on the raw items? Here are a few of his scans.

[Taxman]

Something looks off with the "Copyright 1948" stamp at the bottom.

[Cardboard Junkie]

Colors looked washed out on the 52T 311, and the corners display incredible uniformity of wear====fake. Dave

[auggiedoggy]

Originally Posted by Cardboard Junkie

Colors looked washed out on the 52T 311, and the corners display incredible uniformity of wear====fake. Dave

That's what I thought as well. Those rounded corners look too perfectly rounded. Its a perfect example of a well-rounded card!

[buymycards]

There are several Leaf Musials on ebay, both graded and ungraded. Most of them have the same type of boldness/fuzziness on the copyright 1948. It sure looks good to me.

[cobblove]

another good one someone might get stuck with a 1200 loss.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Babe-Ruth-Ro...item4173ed7e7f

[Leon]

I still don't think the seller can get away with selling the Ruth rookie even if they said no returns. They have an incorrect description and nowhere does it say fake or reprint. Since it says "1916" in the title I think ebay would rule against them if it goes to a dispute.