Who said there are no deals on ebay......

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by tschock

You are 100% correct on this. So where does it show this was a "pricing error"?

I'm not sure what you're looking for? How is it supposed to show that it was a pricing error? What do you want to see?

The only way to know is to call the seller and ask him. If you know of another way, please share.

[chernieto]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

I'm not sure what you're looking for? How is it supposed to show that it was a pricing error? What do you want to see?

The only way to know is to call the seller and ask him. If you know of another way, please share.

What else could the seller say? It is clear he made a mistake, an error a fubar. I always thought people looked through ebay in the hopes of a deal & I never considered my morals would be called into question by agreeing to purchase an item from a seller ( of legal adult age & with over 30,000 transactions) had offered in the marketplace.
Ebay can't force a seller to ship anything. Ask them & they will readily admit that.

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by chernieto

I always thought people looked through ebay in the hopes of a deal & I never considered my morals would be called into question by agreeing to purchase an item from a seller ( of legal adult age & with over 30,000 transactions) had offered in the marketplace.

I've already exlpained this to Pete, but I'll expalin it one more time. Catching a seller napping not knowing what they have (or the value thereof) is one thing. That's their fault for not doing their homework. They listed the item at a price they were comfortable with. Taking adantage of a pricing mistake is another issue.

[tschock]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

I'm not sure what you're looking for? How is it supposed to show that it was a pricing error? What do you want to see?

The only way to know is to call the seller and ask him. If you know of another way, please share.

What I'm looking for is to base an opinion on the facts, not assumptions.

My assumption was that you already called him. Because you are claiming it's a "pricing error", which you and others have claimed as "fact". Or is that an assumption ? You did call him, right? Because you wouldn't just assume it was a pricing error.

See how assumptions work? Or more appropriately, don't work.

I DID go back and look at his other T206 listings, and the price on the Lennox was in line with other common front, similar condition cards. So I take back my statement on them being the SAME price. But they were similar. So there is no clear evidence either way. Which get's back to Peter's point about having to be a mind reader during effectively any transaction.