|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: Brian Goldner
I did a search on T-207's in eBay stores today, and was stunned when i found a common in an SGC 60 Holder, with a BIN for $1.00. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: anthony
hmmm, i would contact ebay and let them know what his intents are...then i'd remind him/her that ebay states that the seller is responsible for their listings...i would insist on it or post neg feedback... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: Max Weder
I would recognize that the vendor made a typo and not pursue completing the deal. It would make no difference to me whether the vendor was a board member or not. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: Steve M.
but you are dead wrong. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: Mark
This sounds like a good bar exam question. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: paulcrstratton
Let him slide. Honest mistake. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: Steve M.
issue is whether it is a "unilateral" mistake of fact or "mutual" mistake. Under the former the buyer would win, under the latter the seller. Any of you lawyers know the answer? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: Eric B
It was obviously a mistake. He is no more obliged to sell it to you for $1.00 than you are to buy it from him for $110.00. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: barrysloate
Brian- I think if he had a BIN of say $50 and you bought it and then he said he meant $100, you would have a good case. But common sense tells you that nobody can sell an EX T207 for a dollar. That was clearly a typo and perhaps the best thing to do is let it slide. What if you were bidding $100.00 and you forgot to put in the decimal point and your bid of $10,000 kicked in at the last second. Wouldn't you ask for the same kind of understanding from the seller? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: Brian Goldner
The seller is a Flint,Michigan based eBay Power Seller, and sells a good bit of vintage material. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: leon
Let him off the hook. Think of if you did it by accident.... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: howard
Based on the bashing Brian Cataquet took on this board recently for refusing to refund money for an altered card I would suspect that most, if not all, responders will tell you that you should not insist on the delivery of the item. If you do and the seller peruses this site (and I'd bet he does) then your reputation could take a similar beating. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: Brian Goldner
Up to now, i guess the consensus is to let it slide, and i'm inclined to agree. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: James Gallo
I had the same thing happen to me but I was the seller. The piece was supposed to be 99.99 and I left off ther first two numbers. The buyer was very nice and we just exchanged feedback. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: Rhys
I seem to remember a famous Contracts case that involved an add for Fur coats about a hundred years ago. The point was that an add like TV's for $4 when it meant $400 was not specific enough but in the case of the Fur Coat it said "First person in the store gets it" and this guys showed up, they didn't give him the coat, he sued and won because the add was very specific and all it required was acceptance under the terms to form a binding contract. Ebay also has very specific language about bids being legally binding contracts. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: Brian Goldner
The $1 part of the transaction, is now null and void. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: Cobby33
Legally, well, it depends on the jurisdiction, but courts are becoming increasingly "liberal" in letting parties off the hook for "good faith" mistakes, assuming there was no detrimental reliance by the other side. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: howard
About ten years ago Pepsico ran a promotion in which you could redeem "pepsi points" for pepsi merchandise. A commercial jokinginly implied that you could get a Harrier jet for 7,000,000 points. A college student noticed that he could purchase pepsi points for ten cents each, raised $700,000 and tried to claim "his" jet. Pepsi laughed him off and the kid took them to court where the judge subsequently laughed him off. His ruling was essentially that any ad that is obviously a mistake or a joke to any reasonable person does not have to be honored. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: andy becker
you did the right thing brian. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Request for Your Opinion on This
Posted By: Al C.risafulli
In the advertising world, many companies include a disclaimer "not responsible for errors in pricing information." As a consumer, I always go under the assumption that if that disclaimer is not present, it is still implied. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OK, what's your opinion??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-22-2008 01:27 PM |
I need your opinion... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 02-06-2006 08:39 PM |
Opinion re this one | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-16-2004 05:09 PM |
Someone once said... (request for help) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 04-11-2002 10:22 AM |
A request to MW | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-13-2001 09:08 AM |