NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-12-2017, 03:38 PM
ajjohnsonsoxfan ajjohnsonsoxfan is offline
A.J. Johnson
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,339
Default What are your card must haves?

A great aspect of the hobby are collector's varying attractions to a card's make-up. For me it's (in order of importance)

1. Centering
2. Registration (clarity of image, lack of print defect)
3. Corners
4. Stains
5. Paper integrity (chipping, rough edges)

Would be curious to hear opinions of others here and Add a card that typifies your choices!

Here's mine:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mantlepsa4front.jpg (76.0 KB, 552 views)
__________________
A.J. Johnson
https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39
*Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished the 1914 Cracker Jack set ranked #11 all-time

Last edited by ajjohnsonsoxfan; 08-12-2017 at 04:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-12-2017, 03:55 PM
cincyredlegs cincyredlegs is offline
Mark Hooks
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 286
Default

Hey AJ. Good topic. Mine would be:

Centering
Corners
Registration
Staining
Paper Loss (back)

Centering use to be down the list but in the last 5 years, it has went to the top.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-12-2017, 04:04 PM
DeanH3's Avatar
DeanH3 DeanH3 is offline
D/e/@/n H/@/c/k/e/t/t
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,945
Default

My list would look just like yours AJ. centering is A1 for me.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-12-2017, 04:41 PM
SMPEP SMPEP is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 880
Default

Mine would be - do I have it or not?

If I don't already have it - who the hell cares what it looks like?

I think all of the people who worry about the condition are certifiably insane. You show me a PSA 10 and I'll show you a card that has been doctored. You show me a PSA 1 and I'll show you a card that has lived a good life and that was well loved.

Fortunately for me, the majority of card collectors care more about shallow appearances than actual substance. Of course living in LA - on a daily basis I see that this last statement applies to a whole lot more people than just card collectors! ;-)
__________________
__________________
Looking for 1923 W572 Walt Barbare and Pat Duncan.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-12-2017, 04:57 PM
OsFan OsFan is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 206
Default

If the card doesn't have sharp corners I'm not really interested.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-12-2017, 05:03 PM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is online now
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,827
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SMPEP View Post
Mine would be - do I have it or not?

If I don't already have it - who the hell cares what it looks like?

I think all of the people who worry about the condition are certifiably insane. You show me a PSA 10 and I'll show you a card that has been doctored. You show me a PSA 1 and I'll show you a card that has lived a good life and that was well loved.

Fortunately for me, the majority of card collectors care more about shallow appearances than actual substance. Of course living in LA - on a daily basis I see that this last statement applies to a whole lot more people than just card collectors! ;-)
^^+1^^ If the card is mostly there with no paper loss on the players face and/or a huge crease through the players face I like it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-12-2017, 05:12 PM
gawaintheknight gawaintheknight is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,039
Default

My approach is: is this a problem the card had when it came out of the pack? If so, I don't care so much. So gum stains, centering, print marks, etc., not usually a big deal. Creases, stains, writing, rips, etc., more of a problem.
__________________
My website: https://edwardwclayton.wixsite.com/my-site
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-12-2017, 05:14 PM
x2drich2000 x2drich2000 is offline
(DJ) Rich.ard.s
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SMPEP View Post
Mine would be - do I have it or not?

If I don't already have it - who the hell cares what it looks like?

I think all of the people who worry about the condition are certifiably insane. You show me a PSA 10 and I'll show you a card that has been doctored. You show me a PSA 1 and I'll show you a card that has lived a good life and that was well loved.

Fortunately for me, the majority of card collectors care more about shallow appearances than actual substance. Of course living in LA - on a daily basis I see that this last statement applies to a whole lot more people than just card collectors! ;-)
+1 For a lot of the stuff I've been into lately, I'm just happy to find an example. And if it is burned, has holes, or is almost torn in half, I'll still take it.

And since everyone loves pics...
T222 Lelivelt
__________________
Current Wantlist:
E92 Nadja - Bescher, Bridwell, Cobb, Donovan, Doolan, Doyle (with bat), Lobert, Mathewson, Miller (fielding), Tinker, Wagner (throwing), Zimmerman
E/T Young Backrun - Need E90-1, T216 (all versions)
E92 Red Crofts - Anyone especially Barry, Shean, and Evers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-12-2017, 06:19 PM
JollyElm's Avatar
JollyElm JollyElm is offline
D@rrΣn Hu.ghΣs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,374
Default

I'm sure there is a huge difference in the level of concern with regards to centering and corners based on whether you focus on pre-war or post-war cards. Since I collect the latter (and they are 'easier' to find), I look for sharp corners first, while centering (as well as other things) is less important. If I collected the older stuff, I'm sure the sharpness of the corners would drop down on my requirements list, simply because it would be much harder to find the cards I want, so I couldn't afford to be too picky.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land

https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm

Looking to trade? Here's my bucket:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706

“I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.”
Casey Stengel

Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s.

Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-17-2017, 05:27 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanH3 View Post
My list would look just like yours AJ. centering is A1 for me.
It looks like a lot of us think the same way. Me too...except for Football Cy he hasn't been shown too recently...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg pe901youngpsa2a.jpg (77.4 KB, 107 views)
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-17-2017, 06:57 PM
DeanH3's Avatar
DeanH3 DeanH3 is offline
D/e/@/n H/@/c/k/e/t/t
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,945
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon View Post
It looks like a lot of us think the same way. Me too...except for Football Cy he hasn't been shown too recently...
Great minds think a like!!

Sam - Spectacular cards. Love em!!

Here's one I stare at almost everyday.

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-17-2017, 08:14 PM
ajjohnsonsoxfan ajjohnsonsoxfan is offline
A.J. Johnson
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,339
Default

Damn I've been looking for a Bat On Cobb just like this one! Dean great looking card!
__________________
A.J. Johnson
https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39
*Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished the 1914 Cracker Jack set ranked #11 all-time
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-12-2017, 11:47 PM
PSACJ PSACJ is offline
Andy M.
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Doral Florida
Posts: 163
Default

AJ,

First of all, that is a tremendous PSA 4 Mantle Buddy.
Here is the way that I prefer my cards when collecting them.

1- Corners
2- Centering
3- No Paper Loss
4- Eye Appeal
5- Edges
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-13-2017, 09:57 AM
jbl79's Avatar
jbl79 jbl79 is offline
Jerry
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajjohnsonsoxfan View Post
A great aspect of the hobby are collector's varying attractions to a card's make-up. For me it's (in order of importance)

1. Centering
2. Registration (clarity of image, lack of print defect)
3. Corners
4. Stains
5. Paper integrity (chipping, rough edges)

Would be curious to hear opinions of others here and Add a card that typifies your choices!

Here's mine:
Amazing 51B Mantle AJ! Higher graded ones can't beat the eye appeal, registration, and centering on that Mick!

I always try to look for cards that are centered, have great eye appeal, and a sharp clean image. I can live with slightly rounded corners since I generally buy low grade anyways. I don't mind minor paper loss on the back if the front has all those attributes. I certainly didn't mind it on the T206 Cobb
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screen Shot 2015-11-20 at 3.33.38 PM.jpg (69.8 KB, 244 views)
File Type: jpg s-l1600-3.jpg (77.0 KB, 244 views)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-13-2017, 09:19 PM
tothrk's Avatar
tothrk tothrk is offline
Bob.T*th
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 212
Default nice

Jerry, those are two nice cards.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
must haves paying huge sums sflayank 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 3 05-11-2014 08:37 AM
As baseball-card sales drop, North Jersey card sellers look to the stars - See more a mcap100176 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 0 03-24-2014 11:03 AM
Introduction and a question on which cards are "Must Haves" Clark7781 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 23 02-16-2010 06:33 PM
TAKING OFFERS -- 1 T card, 1 E card 1 Notebook card 1 Diamond Star plus extra!! Archive Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T 1 12-11-2008 10:09 AM
For sale 1932 Zeenut Hollywood Vitt, Manager Card cool card Archive 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 09-24-2008 11:44 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 AM.


ebay GSB