NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2005, 03:19 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Was this fair?

Posted By: Dennis W.

I realize a '52 Mantle is slightly O/T. But the real question here is how long does a seller have to stand by their card. Is a new standard for the hobby being set here? Interesting...

http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/story/8077271

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2005, 04:32 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Was this fair?

Posted By: Mark

I just read the case, 269 Neb 51 (I can paste it here, but it's lengthy). The most amazing part - after PSA rejected the card as altered, the buyer sent the card to ASA Accugrade. I expected the next sentence to say that ASA graded it a 10, but ASA actually rejected it.

Steve Orand was called as an expert witness and commented on industry practice for return periods as follows: "He testified that teh standard for sports memorabilia was a lifetime guarantee and that a reputable collector would stand behind what he sold and refund the money if an item were fake or had been altered."

In the end, the jury was left to determine whether 2 years was a "reasonable" amount of time to notify the seller that the card was a fake.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2005, 04:56 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Was this fair?

Posted By: jay behrens

There are so many problems with this rulling on so many many levels. The thing that especially irks me is the continued support of the court that people don't need to take responsibility for their actions. If you are dumping that kind of coin on a card, you better be doing your homework on it know what the hell you are buying.

To a degree, I agree that a dealer should stand behind his items 100%, but in 2 years a lot things could have been done to this card that had not been done do it prior to it's purchase. What proof is there that buyer isn't the one that doctored this card and then submitted?

This whole thing is just way too iffy for a court to say that dealer has to back up a card he sold 2 years ago.

Jay

Wow upside down is Mom. Mom upside down is what dad wants to see.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2005, 06:16 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Was this fair?

Posted By: dennis

it could even be a different card? couldn't a good lawyer argue that it wasn't the same card? lot of money to spend on a card that has that much work on it,and not notice it right away?

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-2005, 06:38 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Was this fair?

Posted By: Judge Dred

There are a lot of dealers that have LIFETIME guarantees of authenticity on autographs and other game used equipment. What would happen if a "new" king of game used authentication was throned and (5 years after the fact) deemed that $1M Ruth bat as authentic but not the one used for the first HR in Yankee stadium?

Interesting can of worms...

Oh yes, was it fair? You would have to figure that (possibly) the seller was honest enough to say it was the card and that it hadn't been altered since that time. Personally, I think 2 years is a lot of time, perhaps even too much unless the dealer guaranteed it for life. The next question is if a dealer has a high ticket item for sale, wouldn't it be a good idea to slab it and be rid of the potential for this type of situation. A less than $100 investment in a slab would bring a lot of peace of mind to a $19,000 card sale.

I would also hope, that in this day and age, a seller of high $$$ items would make a hi-res scan of the high $$$ cards that are sold.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2005, 07:41 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Was this fair?

Posted By: qualitycards.com

Did this case just end?
It appears the transaction happened in '95

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2005, 11:09 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Was this fair?

Posted By: jay behrens

The transaction happened in 1995 and the buyer sued in 1997.

Jay

Wow upside down is Mom. Mom upside down is what dad wants to see.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-08-2005, 09:36 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Was this fair?

Posted By: warshawlaw

Looks like there was a state law that covered the transaction...in Nebraska. What was not stated was what happened in the transaction itself: Was the deal made in person or through the mail? Was there a written agreement between the parties? Did the seller have proof of what he sold or did he simply admit that the card was the right one? Did the seller and buyer agree on a warranty? Does the law in question permit limits on warranties or as-is sales? If the deal was done in SF, why is the case in another state?

There are many ways to protect yourselves as dealers from this situation: (1) scan the fronts and backs of all significant cards so that they can be readily ID'd if a question arises later on; (2) use a written term sheet for all significant sales naming a state which has a law permitting waivers of warranties and listing an express warranty with limits or making the deal an as-is sale; (3) use a third party grader and indicate all sales of third party cards are without warranty; (4) use a written term sheet with choice of law and venue provisions to force a buyer to come to your home town to sue rather than hauling your butt across the country.

Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fair is fair; SGC messed up this one Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 9 01-13-2007 11:51 AM
Fair Offer. Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 09-23-2005 06:04 PM
Fair Warning Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 03-02-2005 05:24 PM
It seems only fair Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 06-29-2004 09:59 PM
just to be fair... Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 05-01-2002 07:27 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:40 AM.


ebay GSB