|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The Joe Doyle card doesn't relate to what's being discussed in this thread and I only mentioned it because you brought it up and I completely disagree with this statement. If he was printed early in the 350 only series he would have a Forrest Green Sovereign back like the rest of the 350 only subjects not Apple green. The thread is open to debate so I will ask you a few questions. Haven't you stated previously that senator Russell pulled the cards from packs of Piedmont and Old Mills which were the two brands that he smoked? If this is true I wouldn't expect him to have any of the "elite eleven" with EPDG backs or any other subjects with EPDG backs. If you disagree with the possibility of the 150/350 subjects being printed with EPDG's before PD350 what's your explanation for the print defect on Frank Owen that's found on several 150 backs and also on EPDG backs but no 350 backs or the mark on Tannehill that's found on several 350 backs but no 150 or EPDG backs? Last edited by Pat R; 09-01-2018 at 11:22 AM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: group of 6 EPDG commons | trobba | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 10-22-2014 10:00 AM |
Evidence of trimming? | bobbvc | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 04-05-2014 09:44 PM |
Evidence of E90-1 being printed before E102 | CaramelMan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 08-24-2013 05:40 PM |
The Evidence as Promised | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-01-2008 07:02 PM |
Were T206's printed on sheets of 48 Subjects ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 64 | 04-27-2007 08:50 AM |