NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-14-2017, 10:29 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TobaccoKing4 View Post
I'm hoping you're wrong but I'm sure you are more experienced with grading than I am so you're probably right. I do think the card looks sharper and better in person than what shows on the scan though.
Let us know, it should be interesting. I am hoping you are correct. They do give out high grades but they seem to be to others and not me!!
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-14-2017, 10:40 AM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,040
Default

In the future, STAY AWAY FROM BRICKS!!! I understand you want to keep the card protected, but they make Card Savers in all various sizes.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-14-2017, 03:02 PM
TobaccoKing4 TobaccoKing4 is offline
Harrison
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon View Post
Let us know, it should be interesting. I am hoping you are correct. They do give out high grades but they seem to be to others and not me!!
Ended up only getting a 60. While I'm not surprised that it didn't get a 92, I do think it was graded a bit on the low side. There is a little ink mark on the back of the card so maybe that dragged it down?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-15-2017, 03:36 AM
toledo_mudhen's Avatar
toledo_mudhen toledo_mudhen is offline
Lonnie Nagel
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: St. Joe, Missouri
Posts: 1,356
Default

A 5 coming back from SGC on an otherwise great card is almost always due to a wrinkle or crease. Even those you cant see with naked eye - been there several times and if you look hard enough (magnify) you should find it.

80/20 or better centering, minor rounding or fuzzing of corners, roughness or chipping along edge (no layering), one VERY slight surface or "spider" crease may exist on one side of the card, gloss may be lost from surface with some scratching that does not detract from the aesthetics of the card.

Ink/Pencil usually drops the card lower than 60.
__________________
Lonnie Nagel
T206 : 172/520 : 32.8%
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-15-2017, 01:19 PM
Timbegs Timbegs is offline
Tim B
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TobaccoKing4 View Post
Ended up only getting a 60. While I'm not surprised that it didn't get a 92, I do think it was graded a bit on the low side. There is a little ink mark on the back of the card so maybe that dragged it down?
There are so many things it could be (without or with card in hand, it was still be hard to tell. And, we have all been there. I didn't mean your world would cave in - just that grading companies are, as a general rule, very tough on cards and use more sophisticated techniques and tools than the averag Joe does...

If you are curious, most of the time the guys at SGC will walk you through their explanation of the grade if you call. The flaws they identified and the rationale behind it.

Beautiful card; enjoy it...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-18-2017, 11:51 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,426
Default

Not surprised. I have been disappointed more times than happy. Maybe our expectations are too high? I guess that is what makes the true high grade cards so valuable. But it can still suck hoping for a 7-8.5 and getting a 5. Been there done that, more than once.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TobaccoKing4 View Post
Ended up only getting a 60. While I'm not surprised that it didn't get a 92, I do think it was graded a bit on the low side. There is a little ink mark on the back of the card so maybe that dragged it down?
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-18-2017, 04:52 PM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is offline
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,906
Default

They are super tough on the 32 Sanella. With the thin paper they wrinkle super easy. I looked at the pop report and there are only 2 graded higher than an SGC 80 out of 191 submitted.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-20-2017, 06:57 PM
TobaccoKing4 TobaccoKing4 is offline
Harrison
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 185
Default

I got the card in today and unfortunately it seems like they did a poor job of cutting out the insert and part of the card was damaged inside the holder

I'm guessing this is what caused the drop in the grade.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-22-2017, 07:13 AM
TobaccoKing4 TobaccoKing4 is offline
Harrison
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 185
Default

Here is a picture of the damage that it got because of the holder: I believe this is what caused it to get graded a 60.

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-22-2017, 07:23 AM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is offline
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TobaccoKing4 View Post
Here is a picture of the damage that it got because of the holder: I believe this is what caused it to get graded a 60.

Pretty sure they are assigned a grade before they are put in the slab so that was not why it received the grade it did.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vintage and PSA's grading consistency over time the 'stache Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 14 04-18-2016 08:47 PM
How on-time are grading companies? granite75 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 15 10-04-2014 07:39 AM
First time SGC submitter question. Mrvintage Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 4 03-17-2013 08:24 PM
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 6 09-08-2006 12:36 AM
first time I have seen this grading company Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 6 06-07-2003 08:20 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:17 AM.


ebay GSB