 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
03-15-2014, 05:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Psa 8 (st)
So is it common for a card with a small stain with all the other qualities of a PSA 8 to be designated PSA 8 (ST)???
|
|
#2
03-15-2014, 05:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes.
|
|
#3
03-15-2014, 06:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
ST
I thought it stood for Stupid.
NM except for stain. Brilliant. 
__________________
Thanks! Brian L Familytoad Ridgefield, WA Hall of Fame collector. Prewar Set collector. Topps Era collector. 1971 Topps Football collector.
|
|
#4
03-15-2014, 06:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
"Stupid" <--- Agree completely. I have never understood qualifiers. It's a completely ridiculous and inconclusive way to grade a card. You're being told what a card would have graded if it weren't for some fault.... I always thought the point of grading was to know what the actual condition of the card is. And we're still left wondering what an 8 with a stain would grade. Is it a 4 or a 6? Your guess is as good as mine.
__________________
Collecting Pre-1920 HOF Postcards (single subject, not team postcards) @TreyCumby Last edited by chipperhank44; 03-15-2014 at 06:42 PM.
|
|
#5
03-15-2014, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
03-15-2014, 10:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think the late George Carlin would have had fun with this ... words that shouldn't be associated with each other ... i.e. military intelligence, politically correct, property management, uh ... near mint o/c.
Shouldn't they be called "disqualifiers"!! What's next ... NrMt (nc) - no corners!!! Don't get me started...........oooppps.......too late!!
|
|
#7
03-16-2014, 12:49 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I actually like them
They give a more accurate description and many of the qualifiers were used prior to grading particularly the oc qualifier. There is none for corners/wear because that is the number one factor in determining condition all the other things usually follow off that.
|
|
#8
03-16-2014, 01:19 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't hate qualifiers, but I don't really like them. My biggest pet peeve with qualifiers is a lot of people try and succeed in selling these qualified stricken cards at or near the price of their non qualified cousin. I respect what PSA was trying to do, but in the end, why not just grade the overall card without these little asterisks beside the pseudo grade?
Just not worth it IMO...
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48
|
|
#9
03-16-2014, 05:32 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like qualifiers. For example, when you see PSA 8 (OC), they are telling you that the card is a NM/MT card were it not for a centering shift that happened at the factory and is totally out of the cards control. It allows you to get a NM/MT card at a fraction of the price. It is not fair to give a card like that the lower grade, because they card really isn't a '6'. It has NM/MT corners, surface and edges.
|
|
#10
03-16-2014, 07:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Although I don't understand qualifiers at all, I can attempt to understand the "off center" and "print defect" type qualifiers because, as bobbyw8469 said, they are factory defects. But to have "stain" and "mark" as qualifiers, that's even more illogical than OC and PD. At the end of the day though, whether the factory or an owner caused the card to be in a certain condition, it is in that condition. It's like trying to get a premium for your car with hail damage because the hail damage occurred at the dealership.
__________________
Collecting Pre-1920 HOF Postcards (single subject, not team postcards) @TreyCumby
|
|
#11
03-16-2014, 08:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Agreed
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage.
|
|
#12
03-16-2014, 08:11 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If any of you were selling an SGC 6 with nm-mt corners, you would describe it as "great eye appeal! Sharp corners!" PSA is just labeling the same thing.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
