|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
This post should kill this thread.
This is really how simple it is. Both card pictured are counterfeit. The one sent to PSA got a 8 NM-MT grade. The one sent to SGC came back with a flip that says NO and with a card with COUNTERFEIT checked. Any questions? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
but Ben...that's not possible?!?!?!? PSA is the 2nd coming and SGC sucks. right????
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Reality sucks sometimes.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
The sellers name is: thankforthescrewjob (1524 )
That's all I need to know.
__________________
1916-20 UNC Big Heads Need: Ping Bodie |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
What's it say on the bat knob?
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
this silly question mark crap is preying on the ineptitude of the masses and one of my biggest peeves with them.
Kudos to SGC for a clear NO. I would like to suggest they send it back with this on the flip going forward...
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I think the reason for the "?" is simply their way of saving space. There isn't enough line items to write out "questionable authenticity". Both of those words are pretty lengthy. So they simply put "? AUTH". Most seasoned collectors knows what that means. However, I can see how the novices could fall for that crap.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Adam, I thought everyone knew this one, even a non-baseball card collector like me. It says F**k Face.
__________________
'Integrity is what you do when no one is looking' "The man who can keep a secret may be wise, but he is not half as wise as the man with no secrets to keep” |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I don't see why they have to issue this decision on a flip that looks the exact same as for graded cards. Just return the card in the holder it was submitted in with a letter or something that says could not verify authenticity. The flip with "auth?" creates a sense of ambiguity that sellers such as this are taking advantage of.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If the T206 Wagner had been produced in the same quantity as other cards, a Wagner PSA 1 would be worth something near a Cobb red, say $500. By being under produced, it's worth $400,000. That's an increase of 800x. A common Fleer is worth 1 cent. The Billy Ripken cost me $25, an increase of 2500x. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1930 Goudey- Babe Ruth- questionable authenticity? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 99 | 01-11-2021 06:17 PM |
FS: 1928 Harrington's Babe Ruth and 1933 Goudey Ruth #149 | piecesofthegame | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2013 05:50 AM |
SALE: 1933 Goudey Ruth SGC 10 & 1932 Sanella Ruth PSA 6 | iggyman | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 08-01-2011 05:11 PM |
Questionable Ruth and Mantle | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-25-2010 07:00 PM |
N4: QUESTIONABLE AUTHENTICITY | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-04-2008 06:30 PM |