|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Box scores, anyone?
Here's a picture of Cleveland's League Park. As you can see by the right field fence, it does indeed look like the picture was taken from the third base dugout. Along with the fact that Harry Lord was the Sox third baseman, maybe we can see who might have made it to third in any of those games. I know it's a long shot, but if somebody has access to box scores from 1911, here the days the Sox played in Cleveland:
May 3-6 June 28 - July 1 (doubleheader on 28th) Sept 4 (doubleheader, although I'm not sure this was in Cleveland since they played the previous few games in Chicago - may be a mistake in my source) Anyway, it might be worth a look... Take Care, Geno |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Caught stealing
I meant to add another guess...purely conjecture. If you look at the position of the shortstop on the far right, it would lead one to believe that it is a "caught stealing" since the SS seems to be in postion instead of backing up, cutting off throws, or covering second. Again, totally a guess...but that makes it fun. So who has a box score of those games with a Caught Stealing stat?
Cheers, Geno |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Geno,
Pretty sure The Sporting News would list the CS stat as would the local Cleveland paper, The Cleveland Plain Dealer. The description on the back of the card is somewhat vague as to whether it was a caught stealing or an ordinary put out. Greg |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Caught stealing
Greg --
That's why I think the SS is the key to telling the difference. It's obviously not a force play, so the ball had to come from somewhere. If it was an outfielder making the play, the SS wouldn't be in that postition. If it was the infield, it might be the second baseman trying to make that play, but highly unlikely. The only infielder that would have a shot at third generally is the SS if the runner tries to advance on a ground ball to SS. However, in this picture, the SS is facing the pitcher/catcher. I think it's a steal attempt based on the SS's position. Just an educated guess... Cheers, Geno Last edited by HercDriver; 05-23-2010 at 08:49 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Safe?
And if somebody is checking box scores...he may have been safe with an SB instead of a CS. Hard to tell...
Geno Last edited by HercDriver; 05-23-2010 at 08:51 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Did any of his teammates have that white half-sock on their right leg that he seems to be wearing in all his photos and cards? If anyone can find photos from the other players in those years who it could be, it would be great. I think that in itself could weed out some doubt. There is only a few players it could be, and if none of them wore the white half-sock, what are the odds it's not him.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
sportscardtheory:
Did any of his teammates have that white half-sock on their right leg.. Yes - this was already addressed. Last edited by bmarlowe1; 05-23-2010 at 09:10 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
May 4th he went 0 for 4. May 5th he went 1 for 4 with a SB May 6th he went 2 for 3 with a double and a sacrifice bunt before the game was called in the 8th so the Naps could catch a train. The box scores do not mention any CS in any of the games. Last edited by Matt; 05-23-2010 at 09:15 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1940 Play Ball JOE DiMAGGIO Signed Card PSA/DNA | joedawolf | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 12-15-2009 08:30 AM |
Shoeless Joe Jackson signed, or did Joe's wife sign for him? | tcrowntom | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 06-07-2009 09:30 AM |
CAN SOMEONE HELP?---EBay: A seller has a 1915 Cracker Jack Ty Cobb & Shoeless Joe $4500+ | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 44 | 11-16-2005 10:48 AM |
A couple of nice Shoeless Joe Jackson PSA cards for sale!!!!!! | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 04-29-2005 02:12 PM |
Shoeless Joe | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-04-2005 09:52 PM |