NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 10-06-2009, 04:05 PM
Anthony S.'s Avatar
Anthony S. Anthony S. is offline
D.B. Cooper
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,151
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mozzie22 View Post
Does anyone have images of all the cards mentioned? I would love to see a scan of the Just So Cy Young card.
Here's Cy:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 42420.jpg (14.0 KB, 241 views)
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 10-06-2009, 05:46 PM
bcbgcbrcb bcbgcbrcb is offline
Phil Garry
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,831
Default

Here's the Four Base Hits King Kelly............
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Kelly,King.jpg (11.8 KB, 231 views)
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 10-06-2009, 06:13 PM
benjulmag benjulmag is offline
CoreyRS.hanus
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 753
Default

My opinion, P & S Creighton...for one main reason. That is the only card of his, period. And one of only two known photographic images of any kind. The other candidates are all incredible examples. And, as a practical matter, they are all impossible to obtain. But cards of Anson and Kelly (factoring other poses/issues) are easy to obtain. In regard to Spalding, there are a multitude of other cards that depict him in a team context. And in the solo context, though harder, there are at least two known cabinets/Cdv's.

Last edited by benjulmag; 10-06-2009 at 06:16 PM. Reason: grammer
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 10-06-2009, 06:38 PM
barrysloate barrysloate is offline
Barry Sloate
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 8,293
Default

Corey- over fifty posts and nobody thought of Creighton. Another worthy contender (and it's "grammar").
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 10-06-2009, 06:48 PM
oldjudge's Avatar
oldjudge oldjudge is offline
j'a'y mi.ll.e.r
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Bronx
Posts: 5,385
Default

Corey--No doubt a great card but to be "The" 19th century card, the equivalent of the T206 Wagner. I would think the player should, at a minimum, be a HOFer. I don't believe that Creighton is. In fact, correct me if I am wrong, but didn't he only play at the highest level for a few years? Your Young, now that's a different story.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 10-06-2009, 06:50 PM
barrysloate barrysloate is offline
Barry Sloate
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 8,293
Default

Jay- he died at 21, so he didn't play too long period. But he was a star at 17.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:08 PM
oldjudge's Avatar
oldjudge oldjudge is offline
j'a'y mi.ll.e.r
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Bronx
Posts: 5,385
Default

Exactly--so he is basically Charlie Ferguson from the Old Judge set (a great player who died in his prime).

Last edited by oldjudge; 10-06-2009 at 07:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:21 PM
barrysloate barrysloate is offline
Barry Sloate
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 8,293
Default

Creighton has become a cult figure, as he was the game's first great star.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:38 PM
19cbb's Avatar
19cbb 19cbb is offline
Jimmy
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 329
Default

Barry... I selected the P&S Creighton on post 24 ... after selecting the Anson in uniform give the criteria...
__________________
@jimmyleiderman
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:43 PM
oldjudge's Avatar
oldjudge oldjudge is offline
j'a'y mi.ll.e.r
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Bronx
Posts: 5,385
Default

Barry--I bet 90+% of 19th century collectors can't even tell you what team he played for.
Reply With Quote
  #61  
Old 10-06-2009, 09:47 PM
benjulmag benjulmag is offline
CoreyRS.hanus
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 753
Default

For my nickel, after the Creighton (and to second what Barry said, he is regarded as the game's first superstar) would be the 4BH Kelly. I have always regarded it as the most artistic 19th century card I have ever seen. In the photo shoot which generated the image used for card, multiple poses were shot. One of the other poses in fact exists in imperial cabinet form. At the time the card was produced, Kelly was at the absolute zenith of his career, which I think also is relevant. The Four Base Hits issue is highly regarded, and even a common is a highly coveted item. Being then part of an incredibly scare issue to me adds to the allure. Finally, the Kelly is the only known non-portrait card in the issue.

Much has been said after the N172 Anson in uniform. No doubt it is an incredible card. The thing though which detracts from it, in regard to Holy Grail status, is that it is not Anson's only card in the issue (the other pose being a relatively easy card to obtain). That distinguishes it in a crucial way from the T206 Wagner (as well as the other 19th candidates we have been discussing). Had there been other poses of Wagner in the T206 issue, it is unclear to me whether THE pose would be so desirable.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 10-06-2009, 10:15 PM
19cbb's Avatar
19cbb 19cbb is offline
Jimmy
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 329
Default



From The Library of Congress
__________________
@jimmyleiderman
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 10-06-2009, 10:22 PM
murcerfan murcerfan is offline
Dave Terwi.lliger
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 335
Default

is that a homophone he's leaning against?
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 10-07-2009, 04:43 AM
barrysloate barrysloate is offline
Barry Sloate
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 8,293
Default

Hi Jimmy- sorry I missed that.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 10-07-2009, 05:00 AM
chiprop's Avatar
chiprop chiprop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 299
Default

I understand we are talking about "The Grail", but ... '52 Mantle has thousands of examples, and the t-206 Wagner has close to a hundred. Both common in their respective sets and in my opinion very over rated. I think the grail in pre war is the Baltimore Ruth or t210 Jax. In 19th century, 4bh Kelly is unreal and one of the top 5 cards in the hobbby hands down.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 10-07-2009, 06:02 AM
GaryPassamonte's Avatar
GaryPassamonte GaryPassamonte is offline
GaryPassamonte
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mount Morris NY
Posts: 1,476
Default

The props in the FBH Kelly are different than in the cabinet of Kelly. Also, no Boston on the FBH Kelly's shirt. I know the BOSTON could have been added, but what about the props. Different shoots?
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 10-07-2009, 06:04 AM
oldjudge's Avatar
oldjudge oldjudge is offline
j'a'y mi.ll.e.r
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Bronx
Posts: 5,385
Default

There is only one great 19th century set and that is the Old Judge set. Anson in Uniform is a true rarity, of possibly the greatest 19th century player, and the key card of the set, which is why it is my choice. Kelly 4BH is a great card, but it is from a set that cannot practically be collected. I would think that the K-Bat Ewing is a better choice than the Kelly, but still no where near the Anson in Uniform level. The K-Bat Ewing is a rare card of a better player than Kelly (I think Kelly is possibly the most over rated 19thy century player--but that is another story). BTW, these debates are always fun.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 10-07-2009, 06:07 AM
chiprop's Avatar
chiprop chiprop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 299
Default

I don't know too much about 19th century, but the 4bh is a very cool looking card.

Last edited by chiprop; 10-07-2009 at 06:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 10-07-2009, 06:42 AM
benjulmag benjulmag is offline
CoreyRS.hanus
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 753
Default

My third choice after the Creighton and Kelly would be the Just So Young. Like Four Base Hits, Just Sos are incredibly rare; for a type collector getting a common is very difficult. What makes the Young so special is that it is the only 19th century card (excluding studio cabinets) of arguably the greatest pitcher of all time, and shows him young and trim near the outset of his career. Another ten years will pass before his next card.

I agree with Jay; this is a fun debate.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 10-07-2009, 08:21 AM
ElCabron's Avatar
ElCabron ElCabron is offline
Ryan Christoff
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 449
Default

For me, it's the Creighton. Nothing else even comes close.

Without the "For me" qualifier, I think the answer has to be Anson in uniform followed by Just So Cy Young.

The T206 Wagner is clearly the "Holy Grail" of all baseball cards, even though it's far from that for me.

So I guess if you ask me what THE Holy Grail of 19th century cards is, I will say Anson in uniform. And if you ask me what MY Holy Grail of 19th century cards is, I will say the Creighton Peck & Snyder.

-Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old 10-07-2009, 09:28 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,353
Default missing the boat...

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoizeBringer View Post
For me, it's the Creighton. Nothing else even comes close.

Without the "For me" qualifier, I think the answer has to be Anson in uniform followed by Just So Cy Young.

The T206 Wagner is clearly the "Holy Grail" of all baseball cards, even though it's far from that for me.

So I guess if you ask me what THE Holy Grail of 19th century cards is, I will say Anson in uniform. And if you ask me what MY Holy Grail of 19th century cards is, I will say the Creighton Peck & Snyder.

-Ryan
Most folks in this thread are missing the boat by giving the right answer to the wrong question.....Above Gary stated one of the criteria...

"It would have to be a special player from a classic set that is available enough to be collectible."

I would challenge anyone to show me how that question is answered with most of these answers. Are these mentioned cards available enough to be collectible? Nice debate and certainly what this board is best at.....(imo)
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 10-07-2009, 10:23 AM
rman444's Avatar
rman444 rman444 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 609
Default

Leon - Bingo! See my entries about 50 posts above.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 10-07-2009, 10:35 AM
Wesley Wesley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 183
Default

Everyone is trying to name the rarest or earliest or most valuable card. That's fine, but not responsive to the original question.

Last edited by Wesley; 10-07-2009 at 10:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 10-07-2009, 10:49 AM
alanu's Avatar
alanu alanu is offline
Alan U
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 641
Default

The fact there isn't already a Holy Grail of 19th Century Cards, probably means there never will be one card.

IMHO, part of the the problem is that there are so many sets, not just individual cards that are in short supply, no one card will ever stand out.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 10-07-2009, 10:51 AM
Bicem's Avatar
Bicem Bicem is online now
Jeff 'Prize-ner'
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,079
Default

In that case I really can't think of a 19th century card as overrated as the Wagner or Mantle so I stumped.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 10-07-2009, 10:52 AM
rman444's Avatar
rman444 rman444 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 609
Default

Maybe a better thread would be "Who actually wants one of the Holy Grails?"

I have never owned a T206 Wagner or 1952 Topps Mantle, nor do I think that I ever will really want to given how much they sell for.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 10-07-2009, 11:13 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,353
Default Rman and Wes

Rman and Wes.......Exactly.....we are seeing it the same way. IF we leave out the part about enough copies to be collectible then certainly Anson in Uniform, Just So Young, P and S Creighton and FBH Kelly would be at the top of many, if not most lists..However, with the Anson in Uniform being a total of 4 copies known, and the other 3 far less, these are not the correct answers.

Several board members, of course including myself, own an 1869 Peck and Snyder team card...AND they are available enough to own one if you want to (and have the money). Now, to get technical I don't think Gary mentioned it could be a team card, so if it can't then I am not sure what one I would pick. I kind of like the N172 Ewing and mascot.....it's a great card but I doubt there will be a good, overwhelming consensus on what the 19th Century holy grail is...best regards
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 10-07-2009, 11:31 AM
barrysloate barrysloate is offline
Barry Sloate
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 8,293
Default

There is no consensus, and there are too many rare 19th century cards. Every Kalamazoo Bats New York Giant or New York Met has 1-3 known, but none of them would qualify. There are probably at least half a dozen cards worthy of the title, and the best you could do in determining a winner is to have a poll.
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 10-07-2009, 11:56 AM
uffda51's Avatar
uffda51 uffda51 is offline
Bruce Babcock
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: California
Posts: 576
Default

Along the lines of Leon's post (Hi, Leon), what if we limited our choices to something approaching the availability of the Wagner - say at least 50-100 examples or more. If we rule out team cards and the ultra rare cards of great players, where does that leave us? The 1952 Topps Mantle and the T206 Wagner are clearly the Grail cards of their eras even though the Mantle is not rare and not a rookie, and there are far tougher Wagners than the T206. I don't think there is a true Grail card for the 19th century, although there are certainly some great cards and some tough cards out there, as well as personal favorites. The N162 Anson comes close, though, IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 10-07-2009, 12:02 PM
ElCabron's Avatar
ElCabron ElCabron is offline
Ryan Christoff
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 449
Default Arthur (starring Dudley Moore)

I think most of us answered the original question. I didn't even see the modifications mentioned later. In fact, the stipulations added seem very contradictory to the original question, in my opinion.

In the original post we are asked if there are simply too many "extreme rarities" for any one card to stand alone. Then later we are told it would have to be a "special player from a classic set that is available enough to be collectible."

If a card is "available enough to be collectible" it is automatically NOT a Holy Grail card in my opinion. That's one reason the Mantle and Wagner are both NOT Holy Grail cards. Might be collectible and desirable, but a true Holy Grail card should be nearly impossible. Not impossible. But NEARLY impossible.

Maybe I have a different understanding of the term "Holy Grail" than most. I am unfamiliar with the legend that tells of King Arthur and the knights of the Round Table and their quest to find one of 80 or so examples of the Holy Grail.

Sir Lancelot: OMG! You'll never believe what I picked up in the last SCP Auction!
King Arthur: Wow! Sounds exciting. What it is? A one-of-a-kind item?
Sir Lancelot: Even better! It's a Holy Grail! I was the underbidder on the last 4 that came up for auction, but now I finally have a Holy Grail of my own!
King Arthur: Congrats, buddy! Yeah, I'm looking to upgrade my Holy Grail and there's a nice PSA 4 in the next online auction to close. Like you and I, the auction that's selling it is LEGENDARY!
Sir Lancelot: ROFLMAO!!!
Guinevere: I'd do just about ANYTHING to, I mean "for" anyone brave enough to find the only example of the only card of baseball's first superstar.
Sir Lancelot: Hey, um, I gotta split, Arthur. I'm pretty sure the Holy Grail I just bought was touched up and the images in the auction catalog were doctored since I bought it from SCP. I need to replace it. I think I'll head to the east coast to track down a lead on a Jim Creighton card I heard about. I know, it's no Holy Grail, but still pretty damn cool and far more important than most collectors realize. I might be interested in one of your Holy Grail dupes if I can't get the Creighton. Take good care of that wife of yours, friend, while you still can.
King Arthur: Take good care of my wife? While I still can? WTF???
Sir Lancelot: Um, what I mean is, uh, you never know what can happen in this crazy world. Look at it this way, if anything ever happened to you...or, worst-case, if anything happened to your wife, not like dying or anything, but if she wasn't around any more for whatever reason, at least you'd still have that Holy Grail of yours to keep you company. So you've got that going for you. Which is nice.
King Arthur: Okay, well, see ya, Lancey (said with Bush-like giggle). By the way, what the hell is "baseball" and where is this "east coast" you speak of?
Sir Lancelot (galloping off, voice fading): So long, sucker!

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaannddddd.....scene.

Anyway, I hope this little mini-play gets my point across: It might make you feel like a king to own what most consider a Holy Grail, but you're one of many, and the guy with the real Holy Grail is probably sleeping with your wife.

Shame on you, Corey!!!

-Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 10-07-2009, 12:28 PM
barrysloate barrysloate is offline
Barry Sloate
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 8,293
Default

He's sleeping with my wife?
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 10-07-2009, 02:13 PM
felada felada is offline
D@vid Fel@
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 351
Default

the problem is that the mantle and wagner transcend the hobby. even non-collectors are aware of them and their value. there are really no 19th century cards that fit that criteria. I would offer up the Duke Delahanty as a possibility to the original post though. Great image, rare but not impossible to acquire, and an iconic player with very few issued cards.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 10-07-2009, 03:30 PM
E93's Avatar
E93 E93 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,202
Default

I think when you move to 19th century Holy Grail cards, extreme rarity to a much greater degree than the Wagner or Mantle goes without saying. If the Holy Grail must have 50-75 known copies like the Wagner, then you immediately eliminate 99% of the cards that probably first come to mind for the vast majority of 19th century collectors.

I would still go with the Anson, primarily due to being in the most popular and widely collected set and being arguably the top 19th century player. But I probably would not eliminate the Just So Cy Young just because only one is known. That would be a sort of definition of Holy Grail in some respects. And Cy Young is somebody who is widely known outside the hobby, due the award named after him. Most avid baseball fans today probably could not name two 19th century hall of famers for what that is worth.

My rank would be:
1. N172 Anson in uniform
2. Just So Cy Young
3. 4BH Kelly

Honorable mention: N167 Ewing

Last edited by E93; 10-07-2009 at 03:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 10-07-2009, 03:32 PM
E93's Avatar
E93 E93 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,202
Default

I think requiring some minimum quantity of know examples or collectibility for "Holy Grail" status is counterintuitive to the title.
JimB
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 10-07-2009, 05:57 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,353
Default the title and the question?

Upon further reflection I have to agree that the qualifier of the Holy Grail having a sufficient quantity to be collectible is a bit ironic, at least. So if we are saying "What is your Holy Grail of 19th Century cards, regardless of rarity", which is probably the better way of saying it, then mine becomes the Just So Cy Young. That is the card I would take over any other one, not only from the 19th Century, but any baseball card; period. regards
__________________
Leon Luckey

Last edited by Leon; 10-08-2009 at 06:46 AM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 10-07-2009, 06:37 PM
Wesley Wesley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 183
Default

If we are not responding to the question, then my pick is the 1914 Baltimore News Babe Ruth card.

Last edited by Wesley; 10-07-2009 at 06:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 10-07-2009, 07:12 PM
chiprop's Avatar
chiprop chiprop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 299
Default

There you go, Wes! Baltimore Ruth or t210 Jax is the holy grail for me. Stand up against the '52 Mantle. It's not even his rookie card, and there may be 2,000 examples.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 10-07-2009, 07:28 PM
Baseball Rarities's Avatar
Baseball Rarities Baseball Rarities is offline
K3v1n Stru55
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,182
Default

If we are throwing out the original rules, then one more vote for the 1914 Baltimore News of Ruth.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 10-07-2009, 07:55 PM
whycough whycough is offline
member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 47
Default Holy Cow

I would like to mention the 187 N-172 Hoss Radbourn portrait. 19th century is not my bag, but I'd love one.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 10-09-2009, 04:04 PM
Epps's Avatar
Epps Epps is online now
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 589
Default

I vote T210 Jackson
Reply With Quote
  #91  
Old 10-09-2009, 04:41 PM
E93's Avatar
E93 E93 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,202
Default

I don't think we need to throw out all the rules. Confining it to 19th century would still be nice.
JimB
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 10-09-2009, 04:44 PM
barrysloate barrysloate is offline
Barry Sloate
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 8,293
Default

I was thinking the same thing Jim. This thread was about 19th century cards.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 10-09-2009, 04:57 PM
aaroncc's Avatar
aaroncc aaroncc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrysloate View Post
There is no consensus, and there are too many rare 19th century cards. Every Kalamazoo Bats New York Giant or New York Met has 1-3 known, but none of them would qualify. There are probably at least half a dozen cards worthy of the title, and the best you could do in determining a winner is to have a poll.
Not sure about the specifics. But I think a poll is a good idea.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 10-09-2009, 05:07 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,353
Default poll?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aaroncc View Post
Not sure about the specifics. But I think a poll is a good idea.
If there is a poll the way the question is phrased will be very important. Picking a top 5? cards won't be too difficult but there could be a little bit of jockeying in positions. Certainly many of those already mentioned would make the list. You are welcome to start one Aaron, or anyone else.
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 10-09-2009, 05:27 PM
barrysloate barrysloate is offline
Barry Sloate
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 8,293
Default

I think the N172 Anson in Uniform would win in a poll.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 10-10-2009, 07:36 AM
tedzan tedzan is offline
Ted Zanidakis
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pennsylvania & Maine
Posts: 10,053
Default 19th Century "paper chase"

One of my favorite 19th Century "cards"......how many of these color-tinted Harper's prints of the Harry Wright "Big Bat" in excellent condition
are out there ?
I acquired this one several years ago and have been searching for another one....but, it aint out there.

[linked image]

[linked image]
*
*
*
*
*
SERIOUSLY....this N162 Album is the winner in my book....as the most desirable 19th Century sports collectible.


[linked image]



Lithography at it's best......2 of 12 pages

[linked image]


[linked image]



T-Rex TED

Last edited by tedzan; 10-11-2009 at 08:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
History of the 19th Century baseball to 1872 Archive Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 3 04-23-2010 03:55 PM
Interesting & Funny 19th Century Baseball Stories Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 3 04-02-2009 06:21 PM
The 19th Century: Is it available for $100 or less??? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 15 02-10-2007 06:34 AM
Toughest Sets of the 19th and 20th century Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 14 07-06-2005 11:59 AM
19th Century Question Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 4 02-12-2003 10:47 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:02 PM.


ebay GSB