NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2009, 08:22 PM
Pup6913
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default T205 A Latham or W.A. Latham

I just got this back from grading and was scanning it to add to my pic catalog of T205's I have. I thought at first that it was a mark on the scanner or case but I looked closer to find the faintest W and the period before the A. I pulled out my other A. Latham and it has not a single mark like this nor does any others I could find.

Can anyone supply me with a pic of an A Latham with the same markings or is this a misprinted W.A.Latham???
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Latham 4.jpg (77.5 KB, 233 views)

Last edited by Pup6913; 09-29-2009 at 08:02 AM. Reason: better scan of the card back
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:06 PM
Matt E. Matt E. is offline
Matt E.
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 201
Default

http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/6239/scan0093m.jpg
http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/5503/scan0095.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:51 PM
Pup6913
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I am looking for pics of A.Latham backs. Any and all for comparison to the Honest back.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-28-2009, 11:51 PM
Wite3's Avatar
Wite3 Wite3 is offline
Joshua
J0shua Le.vine
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,228
Default

Interesting...

I do know these were printed with movable type.

So, two theories...first one is that the W. broke on the type face. It happened a couple of times on the T206 set with the front lettering. So this might cause a ghost to appear before the W. was removed from the box.

Theory #2 is that someone tried to add or remove the w. later on to cash in on the rarity (which there really is none).

I have to say that the W.A. Latham is seen with less back advertising but the numbers of samples are close. I would say that the W.A. card is about 1 1/2 to 2 times as rare as the A. Latham card.

Joshua

Curious to see any other examples of this card with a high res. scan of the HLC back.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2009, 06:24 AM
FrankWakefield FrankWakefield is offline
Frank Wakefield
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Franklin KY
Posts: 2,734
Default

With movable type, it could shift during the printing process. And the printers could shift it back where it belonged. This faint 'W' card could be from where that letter had worked a bit loose, but still faintly transferred a bit of ink. Evidently it eventually shifted to where it didn't strike the paper at all, or it broke and wasn't replaced. That faint 'W' looks complete, just faint, so it doesn't look broken to me. So I think it shifted, but didn't break.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2009, 08:05 AM
egbeachley's Avatar
egbeachley egbeachley is offline
Eric Bea.chley
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 920
Default

Looks like an M to me.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2009, 06:10 PM
Pup6913
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Is it true that the W.A. version is only found on Sweet Cap. Backs. The SGC pop report has many listings but only one labeled W.A.

I called them today and they want to see the card again. Want to make sure it is not a stray type error. Even after seeing pics of it. I hope so cause that would make it the W.A. version hopefully.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-29-2009, 06:19 PM
Pup6913
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It is a upsidedown W. After looking under the loupe and a better light you can see the outline. The W is upside down!!!

Now what. Is it still a W.A. Latham or a new variation M.A. Latham

Do you think it will qualify for the 3rd line of type as an misprint or Error??

I would just be happy with the W.A. version but I have to ask.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-29-2009, 08:23 PM
Matt Matt is offline
Matt Wieder
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,358
Default

Perhaps you've found the reason for the variation?
__________________
To send me a Private Message, click here.
Please check out my albums.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-29-2009, 09:46 PM
Pup6913
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt View Post
Perhaps you've found the reason for the variation?

Doesn't there have to be others found for it to be considered a variation? Also a corrected version? What do you need to make a card a variation?

Its a special card but I don't think its that special. Maybe I am wrong though. I need more pics of other Lathams for comparison.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-29-2009, 09:47 PM
Matt Matt is offline
Matt Wieder
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pup6913 View Post
Doesn't there have to be others found for it to be considered a variation?
I assure you, there are several A Latham's and W A Latham's.
__________________
To send me a Private Message, click here.
Please check out my albums.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-29-2009, 11:13 PM
Wite3's Avatar
Wite3 Wite3 is offline
Joshua
J0shua Le.vine
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,228
Default

As far as I know, I have documented the following backs for the Latham cards.

W.A. comes with Polar Bear and Sweet Cap Red Fact. 42.
A. comes with Cycle, Drum, Honest Long Cut, Piedmont Fact. 25, Polar Bear and Sovereign.

Joshua
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-30-2009, 07:32 AM
Mrc32's Avatar
Mrc32 Mrc32 is offline
Michael C
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 248
Default

My A. Latham is a Polar Bear back and it does not have a period in front.
__________________
t205 midgrade and always looking for M101-2 Sporting News Supplements
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-30-2009, 08:14 AM
Pup6913
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Matt I am quite aware of the amount of W.A. and A. Lathams out there. I guess I thought you were talking about the W being upside down. There would have to be more found to be considered a variation, and also a corrected version.

Josh the card is going to SGC this week hopefully for them to review it again. I hope to be able to have you add it to your list as a W.A. HLC back.

I am so curious to what the future holds and the other discoveries that are going to be made in the hobby.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-03-2009, 07:57 PM
T205Guy's Avatar
T205Guy T205Guy is offline
Ed Cavagnaro
member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 51
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wite3 View Post
As far as I know, I have documented the following backs for the Latham cards.

W.A. comes with Polar Bear and Sweet Cap Red Fact. 42.
A. comes with Cycle, Drum, Honest Long Cut, Piedmont Fact. 25, Polar Bear and Sovereign.

Joshua
Joshua,

I have seen a Broad Leaf as well on A. Latham, but have never seen the Polar Bear for W.A - thanks for the info...

Ed
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WANTED: Dead or Alive--T205 W.A. Latham Archive Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T 0 04-14-2009 05:09 PM
FS/FT: T205 cards Archive Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T 5 11-22-2007 03:19 PM
T205 and T206 Cards Available Archive Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T 0 04-06-2007 02:15 PM
Question About T205 Backs...A. Latham And PSA Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 3 01-04-2006 06:50 PM
T205 Joss & T205 Latham Drum back on ebay Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 10 08-24-2005 04:31 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:24 PM.


ebay GSB