Old PSA label advice for 1956 WB

[IgnatiusJReilly]

Hi all. I have a 1956 Topps Dodgers team card that is a psa 6 in one of the older holders. This holder is old enough where PSA didn’t distinguish between white backs and grey backs. My dodgers card is a white back and since it’s #166, it’s in the range where people pay a premium for the rarer white back. I’m thinking of selling my card and wanted to get your collective advice as to whether I should send to PSA for an updated holder. If you were buying this card would you need to see “white back” on the label?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[scotgreb]

In my opinion, as long as the PSA cert verification identifies it as a white back, you're okay, that is, most collectors won't care.
Scott

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[jchcollins]

Originally Posted by scotgreb

In my opinion, as long as the PSA cert verification identifies it as a white back, you're okay, that is, most collectors won't care.
Scott

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

If it does not distinguish on the flip, then I doubt it's going to say that on the cert verification page.

I would think it's a question of how much it's worth to you. What is PSA's reholder fee? And then consider they will take probably at least a month or longer to get it back to you - I don't know, I don't submit with PSA for that very reason - but to me it sounds like a bit of a hassle.

[swarmee]

Originally Posted by jchcollins

If it does not distinguish on the flip, then I doubt it's going to say that on the cert verification page.

Depends how they updated it when the created the variations. Sometimes they took the original listing and added the variation to it, so there are thousands of cards marked with the wrong variation because of this in the registry system.