Magie cards

[Rollingstone206]

...

[BobbyVCP]

Checking VCP both of the original card sales are listed there before they did
their little sex change.

SGC card sold on 2/14/13 by joes vinatge

PSA card sold on 7/8/12 by painthistorian

Both where bought by the same buyer but since eBay started
scrambling the name we don't know it shows as

-***d

[BobbyVCP]

Read the article and think they it was a little harsh on PSA. Think
Joe did the right thing by getting the cards off the market and
paying that person his money back.

Grading is not perfect and it involves humans that are going to
make errors. Like it is always said here "buy the card and not the
holder".

Until we come up with a perfect solution which may be a digital
grading system we are going to have errors. And even then it
wont be full proof.

[Rollingstone206]

...

[BobbyVCP]

Originally Posted by Rollingstone206

I completely agree and was surprised to read that Rick mailed Joe a consigners PSA graded "Magie" card. I can imagine the consigner wasn't too happy with that!

Seems like the consignor knew he was busted and did not even bother.

[Peter_Spaeth]

There was a follow up blog post by Peter Nash claiming Gerry Schwartz was the ebay buyer.

http://haulsofshame.com/blog/?p=27012

[ZachS]

Originally Posted by Rollingstone206

Where is the original thread on this?

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...ighlight=magie

[Cliff Bowman]

[QUOTE

http://haulsofshame.com/blog/?p=26290

[/QUOTE]

No one has mentioned that the original first card graded out at Ex 5, and then after it was doctored it graded out at Good 2. Is this not odd, or am I missing something?

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman

No one has mentioned that the original first card graded out at Ex 5, and then after it was doctored it graded out at Good 2. Is this not odd, or am I missing something?

Not odd at all. Typical PSA inconsistency.