John Rogers Home and Business Searched by the FBI

[shelly]

Chris, he should have used this picture. It would have scared him.


browne_full_national_13.jpg

[wonkaticket]

LOL, you’re in the minor leagues Chris. Call me when you get your own headline.

http://haulsofshame.com/blog/

Peter I know you’re reading this as this is where all of your "information" comes from before you twist it into the wonderful chestnuts of fantasy that is The Hauls of Blame.

I thought I would add something to your article that is rarely seen on your website some facts. I actually bought over $200k from REA last year and consigned $85k worth of items. Here’s another interesting note for the article I paid my bills in full….you should try it sometime people seem to really like it and don’t take you to court. Why would I be open like this…well I have no reason to plead the fifth etc. I also spent a bunch of money with Legendary as well Peter so I must be a huge John Rogers "fanboy" also, funny that didn't make the article?

Also I think your quote feature seems to be broken because not only did you quote me wrong on many things. You also seemed to have missed the parts quoting me on your fraud and legal troubles? Hmm wonder why that was? Also why do you never provide links to this site in your articles? Wouldn’t you want all of your readers to see what trolls the few of us are for themselves? Seems odd you would hide all that great info from your readers…

I’m sure it was just a simple oversight and will make the next article in which you will address all those concerns I have brought up about you. Keep up the good work Peter, and nice NYC dinner shot let me know if you would like a more up to date headshot I’ve changed glasses recently.

Cheers,

John

[MattyC]

Wow, I never knew what some of you guys looked like.

What a handsome crowd. The guy on the top left looks so nice and happy. The top right guy reminds me of a Rodin sculpture.

Now I feel obligated to post a selfie or something. Maybe a glam press shot.

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by MattyC

Wow, I never knew what some of you guys looked like.

What a handsome crowd. The guy on the top left looks so nice and happy. The top right guy reminds me of a Rodin sculpture.

Matt we got to get you out more often are you sure wen to the right site?

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

After reading that article and the trash talking about Net54 I don't think I will visit HaulsofShame again.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by I Only Smoke 4 the Cards

After reading that article and the trash talking about Net54 I don't think I will visit HaulsofShame again.

There is a lot of negativity going on over there. I can't imagine the life he lives. Sad, sad, sad.....

[MattyC]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

Matt we got to get you out more often are you sure wen to the right site?

Wait-- oh my bad, I was on pornhub. Whoops. Return to your normal programming.

[MyGuyTy]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

Matt we got to get you out more often are you sure wen to the right site?

Lol, John I would have taken you for a "handsome billionaire" type, chiseled 6'3" with the looks of Ryan Gosling......

Nice bald head though, you've joined my club

[MyGuyTy]

Originally Posted by MattyC

Wait-- oh my bad, I was on pornhub. Whoops. Return to your normal programming.

xvideos is better.........but I wouldn't know anything about that.

[DerekMichael]

can i ask seriously, who is this person who wrote all of that stuff? i have heard the name, but know nothing about him. it was completely vile what he was saying.

is this a joke or something? the article reads like the national enquirer or something

i am pretty sure everyone on net54 has seen people like Leon Luckey and John McDaniel spend what must have been hours upon hours upon hours to alert board members of various fraud in the hobby and trying to protect people ... so where does all of this stuff even come from???

i love this hobby, but sometimes stuff honestly boggles my mind ... am i missing something here? is this like settling a score, or what ?!?!?!

DEREK HOGUE

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by Leon

There is a lot of negativity going on over there. I can't imagine the life he lives. Sad, sad, sad.....

Even sadder Leon is he’s probably happy. In his twisted world he thinks he’s doing something good and everyone else is just out to get poor Peter Nash. Only in Nash’s world is a comment that I made about the late Barry Halper somehow out of line and worthy of reporting as some sort of big news.

In the past McDaniel has taken his defense of Halper even further stating, “Did Halper have stuff that was questionable, sadly, no doubt. I also think many of us would have had bad items had we built and acquired a collection of that size. In fact, Halper would have been and was a big target for the unsavory of the world to work their trade.”

It’s a laughable thing to watch unless your one of the many collectors left with questionable merchandise from guy who pleads the fifth at every turn.

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

Originally Posted by Leon

There is a lot of negativity going on over there. I can't imagine the life he lives. Sad, sad, sad.....

I honestly didn't know Mr. Nash was a lawyer and capable of rendering intelligent opinions on legal causes of action such as slander. However, since he is then I am sure that he is also aware of the tort of defamation. Having such information one would think that Mr. Nash might want to be careful making public statements that directly accuse people of committing a tort.

Then again what do I know....

[DerekMichael]

He says at one point that Rob Lifson was forging a Ruth signature and selling it?

That is a very serious accusation! Does he even have proof?

To the resident Counsel ... is that not character assassination? Is that not a HUGE deal?

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

Originally Posted by DerekMichael

He says at one point that Rob Lifson was forging a Ruth signature and selling it?

That is a very serious accusation! Does he even have proof?

To the resident Counsel ... is that not character assassination? Is that not a HUGE deal?

That would potentially be defamation.

[Cardboard Junkie]

Originally Posted by DerekMichael

He says at one point that Rob Lifson was forging a Ruth signature and selling it?

That is a very serious accusation! Does he even have proof?

To the resident Counsel ... is that not character assassination? Is that not a HUGE deal?

I think he said Mr. Lifson sold a forged Ruth auto, not that he created it.
He also said Mr. Lifson is a convicted felon.

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by DerekMichael

He says at one point that Rob Lifson was forging a Ruth signature and selling it?

That is a very serious accusation! Does he even have proof?

To the resident Counsel ... is that not character assassination? Is that not a HUGE deal?

Impossible! Peter I demand to know how Rob could sign such a Ruth signature what with my head always up his ass and all?

[Section115]

I think the man FKA Prime Minister Pete Nice should send me $7.99. That is what I blew on Derelicts of Dialect back in 1991. Horrible album.

[wonkaticket]

Oh what the hell I’ll bite….

David do you think there is wake-up call needed for the hobby on Leon, Dan B, Adam W, Barry S, Jay M and myself?

[Cardboard Junkie]

No John, my wake up call remark had to do with the FBIs recent search of John Rogers home and business, and the why of it..............and yes you do bite. Cheers

[DerekMichael]

"In the 1999 Halper sale Lifson catalogued and sold fake uniforms, misrepresented game-used equipment, forged Babe Ruth autographs and even a phony 1846 Knickerbocker baseball he claimed was genuine."

[DerekMichael]

The way he writes leaves things very much open for interpretation.

[DerekMichael]

I guess I should just shut the eff up, but to me, the way he wrote this was very vile and throws out all of these very harsh allegations, but does not offer much in the way of proof.

It just feels this was done in bad taste, at least to me personally.

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by DerekMichael

I guess I should just shut the eff up, but to me, the way he wrote this was very vile and throws out all of these very harsh allegations, but does not offer much in the way of proof.

It just feels this was done in bad taste, at least to me personally.

You asked earlier what's his deal? Derek you figured exactly his deal it in about 10 mins, you’re a lot smarter than most that read his silly site.

I wish it was more fun...bottom line guy owes folks tons of money has mountains of legal problems. He has been accused of selling tons of fake items to some very prominent collectors and may be one of the hobby’s most prolific forgers. When questioned about this past in legal settings he pleads the fifth. Now he spends his days in cyberspace making up fake investigations, claiming to have sources and attacking anyone who brings up his past or says boo against him to draw attention away from his own misery.

What is the result of his deep investigations you ask? Well dig up old photos of me at a NYC dinner with some members. Sort of tally up my REA winnings from 2013 only because I share them here with members….and then make some innuendos about me. I’ve seen more in depth reporting from TMZ.

[bmarlowe1]

Nash quotes me as follows with respect to the Rogers's "Chadwick" photo:
"... SABR’s photographic committee chairman..[I'm now co-chairman, and I wasn't co-chairman at the time of the Chadwick thread].. claimed the man did not resemble Chadwick after comparing the nose and ears to other photos.."

I never said that they did not resemble eachother (in fact they kind of did) nor did I say anything about the ears. I did say, "...First of all you are comparing a fuzzy image to another fuzzy image - pretty worthless. BTW - if you compare the nose to a clear Chadwick semi-profile image - it doesn't seem quite right. But again - the tintype is too fuzzy to be sure about anything."

I asked Mr. Rogers to post a better scan (what was posted was only 100 dpi). He declined.

Sloppy reporting. He did get the pencil thing right.

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by bmarlowe1

Nash quotes me as follows with respect to the Rogers's "Chadwick" photo:
"... SABR’s photographic committee chairman..[I'm now co-chairman, and I wasn't co-chairman at the time of the Chadwick thread].. claimed the man did not resemble Chadwick after comparing the nose and ears to other photos.."

I never said that they did not resemble eachother (in fact they kind of did) nor did I say anything about the ears. I did say, "...First of all you are comparing a fuzzy image to another fuzzy image - pretty worthless. BTW - if you compare the nose to a clear Chadwick semi-profile image - it doesn't seem quite right. But again - the tintype is too fuzzy to be sure about anything."

I asked Mr. Rogers to post a better scan (what was posted was only 100 dpi). He declined.

Sloppy reporting. He did get the pencil thing right.

Mark the nice thing about Peter is he doesn’t let a little thing like facts get in the way of a good story.

[Exhibitman]

Whatever. Just spell my name right; it's all free publicity.

[slidekellyslide]

"Sources indicate that McDaniel, Bretta, Fraser and others knew full well that the Rogers LOA’s were forgeries, yet chose to post the accusations anyway."

"Sources"??? What sources KNEW that I had prior knowledge of forged LOA's. That's hilarious. I think anyone with a semi-functional brain can see that I was surprised that Rogers had anything to do with CC since I actually posted that pretty much word for word and it was even included in Nash's "article". That guy should work for cable news.

[Peter_Spaeth]

This would make a great Goudey or Exhibit 4 in 1 fantasy card.

[WhenItWasAHobby]

Note to Mr. Nash. Slander is communicated in spoken form while libel is communicated in written form.

[slidekellyslide]

Originally Posted by WhenItWasAHobby

Note to Mr. Nash. Slander is communicated in spoken form while libel is communicated in written form.

To be fair, his source may have overheard me tell my wife.

[Cardboard Junkie]

Maybe his source is your....no, I won't say it.

[wonkaticket]

I want to go on record and say this was all Dan’s idea he called me and put me up to it. He hates Rogers as a kid he had a box of old photographs fall on him and since that day has vowed to take anyone down who is related to old photographs.

[autograf]

Then......

Henry.....he is coming for Yee!

[slidekellyslide]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

I want to go on record and say this was all Dan’s idea he called me and put me up to it. He hates Rogers as a kid he had a box of old photographs fall on him and since that day has vowed to take anyone down who is related to old photographs.

You just fell off the birthday list, pal.

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by Sunny

Here’s something to get you started an article from sports Illustrated about Peter Nash.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...us/12/09/nash/

Peter Nash you are the conman. You conned my wife and I out of $11,000 to pay your rent at the house you used to rent in Saratoga Springs, NY. Your credit was so bad you made a deal with the landlord to pay 6 months’ rent up front.

Besides cheating us out of the $11,000, you gave us a bunch of tainted memorabilia as collateral. After we won the lawsuit you have refused to help us sell the collateral. Is it possible that some of the collateral you gave us is stolen? After all one of the items of collateral you gave us was a book entitled “Boston Baseball Club 1871-1897” that was owned by Tim Murnane’s grandson, Raymond Quinn. But you lied and claimed you owned the book and put a value of $2,500 on it and gave it to us as collateral, that is called FRAUD Peter Nash or in other words stolen property. As you are aware the Judge Ordered the book returned to Raymond Quinn which has been done. It’s my understanding the value you put on the book was high. Did you put that price of $2,500 on the book because it had Tim Murnane’s signature inside the book? I would like to know because I want to tell Raymond Quinn. Here’s a nice article baseball historian John Thorn wrote on sportswriter/baseball player Tim Murnane.

http://ourgame.mlblogs.com/2013/05/0...t-of-the-game/

Peter Nash I see that after you used up the $11,000 you were evicted out of the house, see below.

WebCivil Local - Case Detail

Court: Saratoga Springs City Court
Index Number: LT-002832-07/SS
Case Name: MARKS, LINDA COSEO, f/k/a LINDA COSEO
vs.
NASH, PETER
NASH, ROXANNE
Case Type: Landlord and Tenant
Classification: Non-Payment
Filing Date: 11/09/2007
Disposition Date: 11/21/2007
Calendar Number:
Jury Demand: No
Judge Name: Honorable Douglas C. Mills

Attorney/Firm(s) For Petitioner - LINDA COSEO MARKS:
DEAN M COON ESQ Attorney Type: Attorney
188 CHURCH STREET
SARATOGA SPRINGS, New York 12866
518-584-6300


Attorney/Firm(s) For Respondent - ROXANNE NASH:
Self-Represented Litigant

Attorney/Firm(s) For Respondent - PETER NASH:
Self-Represented Litigant

[Michael B]

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide

To be fair, his source may have overheard me tell my wife.

Pillow talk? My this is getting salty.

Disclosure: I am probably one of the few people on this site who has been mentioned on H.O.S. in a positive way.

Mîçhæ£ ßöw£ß¥

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

This would make a great Goudey or Exhibit 4 in 1 fantasy card.

You mean like this.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Michael B

Pillow talk? My this is getting salty.

Disclosure: I am probably one of the few people on this site who has been mentioned on H.O.S. in a positive way.

Don't you think folks should know your full name, given your disclosure?

btw, John, nice Goudey!! Looks to be artificially aged too..

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

You mean like this.

Now you just need names and teams LOL.

[MyGuyTy]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

You mean like this.

Looks like a reprint.....need a back scan please....

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by D. Bergin

Perhaps Josh was pissed because he was afraid Nash would write several hit pieces on his auctions if he attempted to sell his collateral, in essence sabotaging several of his auctions in the process.

It may not always be a case of whether it's real or not, but whether or not you might get stuck in a legal entanglement, similar to what Robert Edward Auctions has gone through with Nash.

I could also picture Nash getting some sort of an injunction against the sale of his "collateral".

I get your point. Peter Nash gets sued by so many people. Check this out, here's a lawsuit from Lelands Auctions suing Peter Nash. What was this lawsuit about Josh Evans? Does this lawsuit have any reason why Peter Nash never writes anything about you? I guess Peter you didn't know John Rogers back then so you couldn't get money from him to fund your lawsuit. You could have asked one of Bekim Laiqi's cousins to borrow money from or maybe you were to deep into them by then. You know Pete how you used to tell me how you had to pay the vig.

WebCivil Local - Case Detail


Court: New York County Civil Court
Index Number: CV-008757-99/NY
Case Name: HOUSE, LELAND'S AUCTION vs. NASH, PETER
Case Type: Civil
Classification:
Filing Date: 03/22/1999
Disposition Date: 06/12/2000
Calendar Number:
Jury Demand: No
Judge Name:


Attorney/Firm(s) For Plaintiff - LELAND'S AUCTION HOUSE:
HERRICK & FEINSTEIN Attorney Type: Firm
2 PARK AVENUE
New York, New York 10016
2125921400


Attorney/Firm(s) For Defendant - PETER NASH:

[Michael B]

Originally Posted by Leon

Don't you think folks should know your full name, given your disclosure?

btw, John, nice Goudey!! Looks to be artificially aged too..

Leon,

Not a problem at all. I am not a fan of Nash and the guilt by skewed innuendo. Nor do I fall for the "If I act the muckraker then perhaps everyone will forget that I am a big pile of muck myself" act either. I just felt that if I commented in this thread that I should at least put that out there. It was the Babe Ruth's will recovery post. I was the one back in 1998 that first discovered probate documents were being stolen from courthouses and assisted the FBI.

Mîçhæ£ ßöw£ß¥

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Now you just need names and teams LOL.

Truthfully there’s a real card Peter Nash tried to con me to invest in for $250,000. It’s so crazy and over the top you will never forget it and I think we can all agree that Peter Nash needs to seriously get professional help. It’s very sad that Nash actually thought I believed in his conman scheme. Here’s the true story:

January of 2007, Pete and I where at the Fireplace Restaurant on route 17 in Paramus, NJ. After we ate Pete tried to pitch to me an investment that would make me millions. Pete wanted me to invest in the 1912 Red Sox first pitched baseball that he had purchased for approximately $140,000 in auction from Sotheby’s. Sometime thereafter buying the 1912 baseball Nash needing money consigned the 1912 baseball to Robert Edward Auctions and borrowed a large sum of money from Robert Edward Auctions against it. Nash wanted me to give him $250,000 for 49% ownership in the 1912 baseball and most of the money would be used to get the 1912 baseball back from Robert Edward auctions. He would then have the baseball cut up and take the string from inside the baseball and have the string cut into 2 inch lengths. Nash knew the full length of the string inside the baseball and how many 2 inch pieces could be made. Then Nash would have a professional company take the 2 inch pieces of string and put them onto a baseball card. After that he would make a deal with the Red Sox and Memorabilia shops to sell this 1912 Red Sox first pitch baseball cards for $20 each. Nash had this crazy conman proposal all figured out showing a gross profit of $28 million and a net profit of $23 million. At the time I was friends with him so I didn’t want to laugh at the idea and tell him how crazy the idea was so I told him my wife, Lisa probably won’t go for it. So then Pete went for the second pitch to get money from me. He asked me to invest in a bunch of Joe Jackson bricks that he acquired from Shoeless Joe Jackson’s house, I’ll leave that story for another time.

Peter Nash instead of writing a bunch of crap on your website and wasting your time. Why don’t you do something constructive and do a nice write up on all the collateral we have of your so we can sell it and apply it to the Judgment we have against you. As you are aware we have a Court Order to sell this collateral in a commercially reasonable manner. As you are aware we have moved our judgment to NY State and filed it in Saratoga County where you live. Remember any money we spend on legal fees going after your assets, we will make a motion to the court for you to pay those legal fees. The interest on the Judgment is over $100 per day. So why don’t you help yourself and pay down on the Judgment by helping us sell your collateral we have been Court Ordered to sell. Our attorney told us we have many options, asset depositions, wage garnishment, bank accounts, personal property, including attaching your website and selling it to the highest bidder. I hope you will help yourself and send me that write up on your collateral.

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by Sunny

including attaching your website and selling it to the highest bidder.

What's the starting bid Robert?

[atx840]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

What's the starting bid Robert?

Dolla dolla bill y'all

[Ease]

Selling $28mil of old baseball string would be quite a feat. I'd love to hear the Joe Jackson bricks story.

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by atx840

Dolla dolla bill y'all

Funniest thing that's not even Peter Nash, that is a look alike...I know LOL, but true.

[Cardboard Junkie]

Let's see....28 million bucks divided by 20 Bucks for each card=1,400,000. cards.

2 inches of string per card= 2,800,000 inches of string.

There are 63,360 inches in a mile or enough for 31,680 cards....but we need 1,400,000 cards

So one would need over44 miles of string to make 1,400,000 cards at 20 bucks a pop to get 28 megabucks.

Are there 44 miles of string in a hardball?

My research says there are 363 feet of string in a baseball, and 744 feet of yarn. I dunno maybe my math is off. Anyone?

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

What's the starting bid Robert?

On which items? The website or the collateral. The website I guess I can start it at $1.00 and see where the bidders take it. I’m sure there's a few companies or people out there that would want to bid on the website.

If Nash doesn’t give provenance or a write up on the collateral maybe I’ll sell all the collateral items in an “AS IS” auction. I can start the bidding at $1.00 and see where it goes. My problem is I hope some of the collateral I have wasn’t stolen from old lady Katherine Dooley in MA. Her attorney Jeff Roberts told me last year they considered going after Nash. He asked me, where is the Hugh Duffy bat. I told him John Rogers bought it in an “AS IS” auction along with a lot of other stuff that came from the Dooley collection, including the signed Babe Ruth mitt that came from McGreevy’s bar. Jeff Roberts, Esq. told me that Nash was allowed to take some stuff from Katherine Dooley’s house and get it appraised but they were never told what those items were. Nash never came back with an appraisal. The law firm did give me a bill of sale of 54 items Peter Nash did buy for $25,000 from Katherine Dooley plus 2 scrap books from sportswriter John Drohan, that Nash paid $1,000 for. But the bill of sale does not include the Hugh Duffy bat nor other McGreevy items like the King Kelly bat, Cap Anson Bat and the signed Babe Ruth mitt and so on. They did give me an inventory list which had the Hugh Duffy listed but the bat was not on the bill of sale. Maybe this is why Peter Nash pleaded the fifth dozens of times. The bill of sale did include the 1898 Hugh Duffy trophy but why didn’t Nash show Robert Edward auctions the bill of sale of the Hugh Duffy trophy. Instead that trophy was part of the “AS IS” sale. One of the law firm’s attorney’s was 50% executor of Kathrine Dooley’s estate. The law firm has a fiduciary responsibility to tell all the heirs what happen with the memorabilia. I wonder if the FBI was searching for the Dooley items at John Rogers properties. She died in June of 2009 so I guess the statute of limitations are good. By the way Legendary Auctions sold the 1898 Hugh Duffy trophy for $36,000. the Hugh Duffy bat and King Kelly bat are now in The National Pastime Museum. legendary Auctions sold the Cap Anson bat in August of 2012 for $53,775.

Peter Nash you should know that just a few months ago that Katherine Dooley’s law firm was deposed. The lawyer said a lot of interesting thing about you such as you returning a baseball that was missing and giving it to the attorney at Katherine Dooley’s funeral.

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

Seizing the website is an interesting idea. I would definitely look into wage garnishment and possibly going after any ownership interest in his music.