Cards or Art?

[skelly423]

The frame job wasn't cheap, but it was cheaper than the cards. Most of them were PSA/SGC 3s and 4s

Originally Posted by conor912

That frame job must have cost more than the cards!

[thatkidfromjerrymaguire]

In my only foray into the T206 world as a KC baseball fan, I built the small Kansas City Blues team set and hung it in my home office. I thought it would be fun to decorate the matte in a "Piedmont" style. I cut holes in the back of the matte so you can still see the backs if you turn the frame over.

Fun project, and the only T206 cards I own.

Pic1.JPG

Pic11.JPG

[Casey2296]

Originally Posted by skelly423

The frame job wasn't cheap, but it was cheaper than the cards. Most of them were PSA/SGC 3s and 4s

Fantastic display with well designed aesthetic appeal.

[skelly423]

Originally Posted by Casey2296

Fantastic display with well designed aesthetic appeal.

That’s very nice of you to say, thank you.

[brianp-beme]

Speaking of T206, I framed these on my scanner to produce this work of T206 art. It was produced during my red/orange period.

Brian (if I were to reframe this scan, I would stick Criger on far right of bottom row. It is the artist's prerogative to tinker with his creations)

[brianp-beme]

Originally Posted by brianp-beme

Brian (if I were to reframe this scan, I would stick Criger on far right of bottom row. It is the artist's prerogative to tinker with his creations)

Speaking of tinker, the Tinker portrait card would slot in nicely in this arrangement, perhaps replacing the Kling. Although I love the individual look of Kling's two tone background, the red background present on the Tinker portrait better suits the artistic vision for my ensemble cast of portraits.


Brian (Tinker not mine...what do you think, I'm made out of red/orange money?)