|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Not deserving of a PSA, but since the question was asked:
1) Feathering on top right is not usually discounted since it's a factory cut. 2) Card was graded many (20?) years ago. 3) Top/bottom centering is not nearly 70/30. There's an optical illusion going on because of the top prong. 4) Back centering is pretty awful. PSA 10s only have to be 75/25 on back, but this definitely isn't. 5) Not sure when their current rules on grading were defined. It's possible those came in after this one was graded. Someone who doesn't care about the grade (but likes the card) could make a lot of their investment back by sending it to PSA and having them regrade it, then take the cashout to the current value.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Who is the LEAST deserving player in the HOF in the T206 set | bbcard1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 09-12-2016 08:36 PM |
Why would someone Leave a non deserving Low DSR? | Buythatcard | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 11-25-2012 04:01 PM |
The most deserving 19th Century Player not yet enshrined in the HOF | martyogelvie | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 10-17-2010 07:35 PM |
Think theres deserving 19th century players not in the HOF | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 06-06-2005 12:39 PM |