|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Results
Thanks for the advice guys, the Q-Tips and distilled water worked like a charm. See for yourself.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
^^^^ Awesome!! Great job and great picture!
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Came out very nice. Congrats.
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
My first try was a success. Patience and a lot of Q-tips is key. This is my first photo in uniform of my cousin Johnny Golemgeske, Captain of the Wisconsin Badgers 1936. He played for the Brooklyn Dodgers from 1937-40. The de-cropping made him look stockier too.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I have done this to photos as well. One nagging concern I have had is the long term effects of water on the photo emulsion and paper. A 100 year old photo can become dry and brittle. I'm sure the paper such beneath the 100 year old emulsion would absorb water like a sponge. As the photo dries out again is it possible that the emulsion could separate from the photo and flake off in the future? In the short term you benefit from improved appearance I'm curious about potential damage in the long term.
__________________
1971 Pirates Ticket Quest: 97 of 153 regular season stubs (63%), 14 of 14 1971 ALCS, NLCS , and World Series stubs (100%) If you have any 1971 Pirate regular season game stubs (home or away games) please let me know what have! 1971 Pirates Game used bats Collection 18/18 (100%) |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I've never seen any damage.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I think Mike has a valid concern whether there will be damage in the long term. It is definitely a good question to ask. He used a 100 year old photo as an example in this post. Considering the age of his example photo, "long term" could be defined as 25+ more years in the future. Although I have been removing editor's ink (using water) for several years, I don't have a 25 year old sample to judge whether damage occured as a result of using water.
I will update this post in 15 years when I have a 25 year old post-removal using water example.
__________________
Cur |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I would be very cautious with any photo that had cracking, crazing, or otherwise allowed water to get to the paper substrate. I emphasize again, go slow, be careful, and if the gelatin surface appears to be getting gummy or sticky or otherwise absorbing the water, stop and let it dry completely.
This is NOT the same as soaking cards from an album, and there may well be an age or "brittleness" of the gelatin surface beyond which one would not want to attempt this on an amateur level. I do not think I have attempted it on any 100+ year old photos, and do not think I would personally be comfortable doing so on a photo that had surface damage (loss or cracking of the emulsion surface).
__________________
Ebay Store and Weekly Auctions Web Store with better selection and discounts Polite corrections for unidentified and misidentified photos appreciated. Rude corrections also appreciated, but less so. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(SOLD) c.1924 New York Yankees Pinstripe Uniform Babe Ruth Silver-Gelatin Photo | sporteq | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 11-22-2016 08:38 AM |
Any advice on cleaning B18s? | conor912 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 07-21-2016 05:19 PM |
1935 Babe Ruth Boston Braves Silver Gelatin Vintage Photograph | sporteq | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 12-07-2015 12:29 PM |
1937 NY Yankee Lou Gehrig vintage Silver Gelatin Photo | sporteq | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 09-29-2015 12:12 PM |
1908 Giants Silver Gelatin Photograph | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 2 | 08-27-2006 07:08 PM |