|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
I think you have two brains stuffed in you head Patrick.
That is some of the best T206 research I have seen. Right up there with Cathey figuring out the Print Groups. JR
__________________
T206Resource.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
That's the fun of it Pat. That there's room for alternate ideas and we can discuss them and disagree.
I do think that the larger sheet idea is a fading one. Originally using Scot Rs ideas on production numbers and the sheets/hr rate of 1910 presses, I thought a much larger sheet was most likely (after a brief flirtaton with the idea of a much smaller sheet with only 12 subjects, now almost certainly wrong) But the scratches have paid off wonderfully. something I'll make a second reply about. The things that would prove a gap between sheets are incredibly unlikely to turn up. Horizontal miscuts with a big left or right margin, an uncut fragment with that gap. Not happening. A card that fits that gap? Should have turned up by now. It's absence is probably the most convincing argument against. And the possibility of multiple printers makes the math requiring near constant production OR a very large sheet not work so well. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
What Pat has accomplished with the scratches is probably not just one of the best bits of research on T206s, but possibly the best in almost any hobby. In stamps, it's called plating. Figuring out the minute differences that let you know for sure not only what plate a stamp is from, but exactly where on the sheet it was. The guys who are famous for it worked mostly in the 1930s-50's When the ones it was most possible or interesting for were readily available in large quantities for not much money. Like boxes of thousands..... It took them decades to mostly plate a few stamps from the 1850's One has a known plate that still isn't totally plated. And that's with a known sheet size, and plenty of blocks of multiple stamps available to study, some with the plate number on them. Pat has mostly assembled two different sheets without blocks, without a known sheet size, and with minimal collaboration*. The vertical scratches on the other sheet have gone a long way towards knowing how many cards tall the sheets were. There are still things to be figured out, but this much advancement in such a short time is amazing. *I was saving scans and when we first compared notes I had only about half of what Pat had found. I stopped saving scans after that unless something was unusual. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Just wondering about printing techniques giving further insight to T206 page layout. | iwantitiwinit | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 09-05-2014 06:27 AM |
E92 or other E Card Set Layout | Jaybird | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-17-2012 07:00 PM |
1910 Baseball Sheet Music - Complete | IronHorse2130 | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 12-30-2010 08:55 AM |
W504 Brroklyn Complete Sheet | jim | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-17-2010 07:49 PM |
1948 LEAF complete on an uncut sheet | Archive | Boxing / Wrestling Cards & Memorabilia Forum | 15 | 08-24-2007 06:15 AM |