|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
She has her own agenda and twisted your words to further it.
Same thing happened to me once when I sent a comment to the editor of the Minneapolis Star Tribune. It was 4 short paragraphs. The first 3 were a set-up, and the fourth made it clear I was being facetious. They printed my letter, omitting the final paragraph, making it seem I was in support of something I was clearly against. Can you write a polite letter to this reporter's bosses, informing them what she did? Reporting needs to be fair and even-handed. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Not worth your further ink on the matter. Move on to something else.
IMHO Butch T.
__________________
Man proposes and God disposes. U.S. Grant, July 1, 1885 Completed: 1969 - 2000 Topps Baseball Sets and Traded Sets. Senators and Frank Howard fan. I collect Topps baseball variations -- I can quit anytime I want to.....I DON'T WANT TO. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I really hate reporters as they only seem to report what they want for their own agenda even if its a lie. And you can quote me on that.
Bob |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
It appears PhilliesFan likes to spread misinformation because he "hate[s] reporters." In his own words, he has his "own agenda" admitting that when he speaks "its a lie." He is so brazen, he even challenged this reporter to "quote me [him] on that."
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Collector of all things Ripken, Yankees, 1958. Successful transactions with: 300dw123, autograf, bn2cardz, buymycards, CobbvLajoie1910, Daves_resale_shop, frankbmd, GoCubsGo32, GoldenAge50s, GrayGhost, Head928, Jayworld, jdl860, jgmp123, kamikidEFFL, larrie804, Leerob538, lharri3600, Lordstan, megalimey, Orioles1954, quinnsryche, Redleg25, rjackson44, Rob D., SAllen2556, scmavl, slantycouch, slipk1068, Smanzari, TCMA, thetruthisouthere, Wolfgang427, yanks12025, ZackS |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Blast her in a Letter to the Editor.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How ticked?
Deer- I like the idea of contacting her boss and providing a clear explanation
of her "mistakes". One time could have been sloppy work, a second time with her fluff-off response indicates she needs fixed; after all, it's you she is misquoting. Trent King |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I sent a gently scolding email to the editor about her reply, explaining my concerns of her use of my name whilst summarizing instead of 'Some residents'. And when she quotes, whether paraphrasing or directly, it should be accurate. "Deertick said (bullshit, bullshit, bullshit)" when her intention was clearly to summarize others statements is breaking a basic tenet of journalism. The fact that she quoted one word I said doesn't negate the context she presented.
I did present it more as a heads-up instead of a demand for action, so we'll see if there is a reply.
__________________
"If you ever discover the sneakers for far more shoes in your everyday individual, and also have a wool, will not disregard the going connected with sneakers by Isabel Marant a person." =AcellaGet |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Sent from my Infinix X6516 using Tapatalk |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Last edited by danielantonino5; 01-24-2024 at 03:07 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
And I may contact the paper, only because her response clearly admits she used some jacked up conceit.
__________________
"If you ever discover the sneakers for far more shoes in your everyday individual, and also have a wool, will not disregard the going connected with sneakers by Isabel Marant a person." =AcellaGet |
|
|