NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2005, 09:03 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Card Backs

Posted By: Little Lee

Hi Everyone,

I have a question about the back of the cards.

If the front of a card grades say a strong VG-EX, and the back would rate a lesser grade, how would the card be graded over all? And how much damage would you all put up with on the back?

I'm speaking of the T tobbaco cards in general, put would be interested in your views of any cards in the same situation.

Thanks, Little Lee

"Of all the things I lost in life, I miss my Mind the most" "Smith's Law, Murphy was and optimist"

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-26-2005, 09:22 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Card Backs

Posted By: barry arnold

I find this issue to be one of the most frustrating for me as a collector
of the T206's. I've had over 200 graded by SGC,GAI, or PSA and have found
that, if the back has any damage at all, the card grades no higher than
good. This has been the toughest for me with HOF's when the front is easily
sgc 50 or better and the back damage puts it in the good range.
I finally learned, after too long a time, to make sure the backs are clean and in
good shape so as not to perpetuate my frustration at the 'lowered' grades.
Certainly, it makes sense that the back should be clear and clean to merit
a high grade, since the cards as a whole is being graded.
Still, the frustration lingers.

Hope this helps.

all the best

Barry Arnold

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-26-2005, 09:36 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Card Backs

Posted By: dennis

in grading back is equal to front. i agree w/barry's post above,but when buying it's good!

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-26-2005, 09:46 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Card Backs

Posted By: Julie

Even if the back is not rare and worth a premium on that particular card, grading companies (and I think most of us, too) think that seriuous back damage to a deadballera card brings the value way down. I had a T206 Griffith portrait posted on my website--common back--Piedmont, I think, and decided I had to get rid of some T206s, because I was running out of space. Although the card has a great front and sharp corners, it was the first card I thought of removing, because there was a 1 1/2 inch of missing Piedmont back, where a piece of tape had been removed.

As for blank-baked cards, I agree with a great collector named Buck Barker--a blank back is a great place to store information about the player, be it a Zeenut or a N172. Grading companies, and many collectors, however, disagree with me (Masatro, I notice, makes no distinction between N172s with marked backs and those with unmarked backs--ungraded, or course). Some backs are treasured by some of us because a famous collectior wrote career details on them--but I have a N172 Smiling Mickey Welch, with his w-l record scrawled all over the back in fountain pen, which I find particularly interesting, because it doesn't quite match his record in the Baseball Encyclopedia, and it wasn't written by anyone famous, either.

However, you'll find, when itr comes to grading, even completely blank-backed cards (no color of any kind)--the grading companies do not go easy on them.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-26-2005, 11:05 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Card Backs

Posted By: Colt McClelland

I think the original post is accurate for the most part - even a small amount of back damage seems to mean a card is Good at best as far as a professional grading company is concerned. However, I view this as a positive when I am buying a card that has already been graded a "2" and the only problem with the card is some minor back damage. I have several E cards in my collection that look like a 4, 5 or even 6 from the front, but they are in a 2 holder based on back damage. Sometimes the back damage is significant (which probably deserves a 2 in my opinion), and other times is is very minor (which probably deserves a small adjustment to the overall grade but not an automatic 2 in my opinion). My main point is this - it's a great way to pick up a very attractive card at a low price when you are buying these cards in 2 holders.

As a side note, I have noticed that GAI seems to be much more lenient on this issue. I have several GAI 3 cards with some minor paper loss on the back, which would never get a 3 grade from SGC and probably not PSA either.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-27-2005, 07:06 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Card Backs

Posted By: warshawlaw

I bought an N29 with a gorgeous (nm to nm-mt) front and a back stain. Got a vg-ex from SGC.

How badly you are penalized really depends on the level of disparity and level of damage.

Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Collecting card backs Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 27 04-11-2007 07:18 PM
Gentlemen: there are only two different card backs. Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 16 09-03-2006 07:58 PM
T206 backs - is there a checklist of cards with certain backs? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 06-06-2006 05:34 AM
(4) Card t205 Lot FT: All Different Backs Archive Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T 0 03-21-2006 07:02 PM
Vintage Card Backs Question Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 3 12-19-2002 01:57 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:28 AM.


ebay GSB