NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2015, 11:01 AM
braves_43 braves_43 is offline
Deron Manndel
member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 116
Default Help Needed - Goudeys & Play Balls

These cards were recently acquired in a lot of 1950s & 60s cards I purchased. Just curious to see what people's opinions are on these cards - real or fake? I'm not too familiar with these sets. Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1933 Goudey Front.jpg (14.8 KB, 177 views)
File Type: jpg 1933 Goudey Back.jpg (11.8 KB, 178 views)
File Type: jpg 1940 Play Ball DiMaggio Front.jpg (17.2 KB, 178 views)
File Type: jpg 1940 Play Ball DiMaggio Back.jpg (24.0 KB, 179 views)
File Type: jpg 1940 & 41 Play Ball Front.jpg (13.1 KB, 178 views)
File Type: jpg 1940 & 41 Play Ball Back.jpg (14.3 KB, 179 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-13-2015, 11:36 AM
RaidonCollects's Avatar
RaidonCollects RaidonCollects is offline
Owen R
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: England
Posts: 222
Default

Not in any way an expert of any kind, so take this with a grain of salt.

But, the cards seem quite glossy (and reflect a lot of light), I don't own any Play Ball or Goudey cards, so I wouldn't know if that was the card with those cards.

~Owen
__________________
1955 Topps 171/206
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2015, 11:39 AM
rgpete's Avatar
rgpete rgpete is online now
Ronald Glenn
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Lake Norman N. Carolina ( New Jersey Born and Raised)
Posts: 1,487
Default

The Play Balls I have are flat no shine.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-13-2015, 12:00 PM
Bill77 Bill77 is offline
Bill Avery
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 633
Default

The damage on the back of the Joe DiMaggio card looks like it was done to remove the word reprint.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-13-2015, 12:54 PM
mattsey9's Avatar
mattsey9 mattsey9 is offline
Mike Mattsey
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill77 View Post
The damage on the back of the Joe DiMaggio card looks like it was done to remove the word reprint.
My thoughts exactly...

__________________
Nationals attended: 4 (3with Otis)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-13-2015, 01:16 PM
Joshchisox08's Avatar
Joshchisox08 Joshchisox08 is offline
J0$H B^ck!ey
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: C0nn3cticu+
Posts: 1,943
Default

I like to try and do these without looking at what other's have posted. I'm no expert on either set.

I do own one Goudey however Evar Swanson.

The stock paper on those cards don't look period at all they look like they have a glossy finish to them which should not be the case for that period. I hope you can get your money back or I hope you didn't spend too much because to me they look like reprints.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81%
49/76 HOF's 64%
18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90%
22/39 Unique Backs 56%
80/86 Minors 93%
25/48 Southern Leaguers 52%
6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60%

237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW

Excel spreadsheets only $5
T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!!

Checklists sold (20)

T205 8/208 3.8%
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-13-2015, 04:22 PM
Spike Spike is offline
Matthew Glidden
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 345
Default

Of all, the DiMaggio looks most suspect for reasons mentioned by others. The 1940/41 non-stars might be OK, just very worn. Would love close scans of the 1933s, but they could be hand-cut from a reprint page or something similar; one of the bottom edges is angled without the corner being worn to match.
__________________
Number5TypeCollection.com, blogging the vintage century one card set at a time.

Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest-running on-line collecting club. Find us at oldbaseball.com.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-13-2015, 04:56 PM
braves_43 braves_43 is offline
Deron Manndel
member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 116
Default

Thanks for the responses. I'm thinking they're all fake at this point based on everyone's input. It's not a huge deal because they came in a lot of cards I know are authentic. These were the ones I wasn't sure about. The Goudeys don't look good at all. I thought maybe the Play Balls were legit but now I'm not so sure. It definitely looks like someone scratched out "reprint" on the DiMaggio.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-13-2015, 05:35 PM
braves_43 braves_43 is offline
Deron Manndel
member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 116
Default

Here's scans of the fronts and backs of the cards. I figured this would be clearer than taking pictures with my phone. Hopefully this helps clear things up. Let me know what you guys think after taking a look at the scans. Thanks again!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Goudey & Play Ball Front.jpg (43.7 KB, 102 views)
File Type: jpg Goudey & Play Ball Back.jpg (78.6 KB, 102 views)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-13-2015, 06:01 PM
cardsfan73's Avatar
cardsfan73 cardsfan73 is offline
Scott Ti3k
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 713
Default

All show signs of intentional damage and/or eraser marks where the word "reprint" would have appeared. 99.9% sure they are all reprints.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-13-2015, 06:19 PM
braves_43 braves_43 is offline
Deron Manndel
member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 116
Default

Yeah, I see what you mean.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SOLD Goudeys and 39 Play Balls for Sale! WELL UNDER VCP! Updated 8-28 Golfcollector 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 4 08-28-2015 09:27 AM
FS: '41 Double Plays/'40 Play Balls/'41 Play Balls skipjackskins 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 6 02-27-2013 01:57 PM
GOUDEYS, PLAY BALL JOE JACKSON, DOUBLE PLAY DIMAGGIO Archive 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 1 08-03-2008 12:37 AM
play balls and goudeys Archive 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 04-27-2008 08:03 PM
Goudeys Diamond Stars and Play Balls on Ebay Archive 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 1 05-06-2005 06:47 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:54 PM.


ebay GSB