1927 Yankees team ball forgery

[David Atkatz]

Especially when the high priests keep the knowledge secret.

[thetruthisoutthere]

Originally Posted by David Atkatz

Especially when the high priests keep the knowledge secret.

What do you mean by that comment?

[novakjr]

C'mon David, really? This was a somewhat reasonable and informative thread. At one point in this thread you noted that one of the reasons you began to suspect this ball is because of Chris' posts. And then you get bored and start poking at him. C'mon, seriously. You gotta knock that off...

[David Atkatz]

My post had nothing at all to do with Chris. He can flatter himself and think that it does, but, regardless, it does not.

[thetruthisoutthere]

Originally Posted by David Atkatz

My post had nothing at all to do with Chris. He can flatter himself and think that it does, but, regardless, it does not.

You really are an antagonist, David.

I never wrote that your post had anything to do with me. I simply asked "What do you mean by that comment?"

[David Atkatz]

Originally Posted by thetruthisoutthere

You really are an antagonist, David.

I never wrote that your post had anything to do with me. I simply asked "What do you mean by that comment?"

I never thought you did. I wasn't talking to you, Chris. I was addressing David, whose post follows yours.

[novakjr]

Originally Posted by David Atkatz

My post had nothing at all to do with Chris. He can flatter himself and think that it does, but, regardless, it does not.

It was obvious, even before Chris mentioned something. I'm not gonna get into any arguments with you. But I call it how I see it. If you've got issues with people not going into details about what they know, then just suck it up and deal with it, instead of constantly poking them and trying to antagonize them into something.

Sorry Chris for jumping to any conclusions for you. But I thought it was that obvious, and it kinda pissed me off a bit

[thetruthisoutthere]

Originally Posted by novakjr

It was obvious, even before Chris mentioned something. I'm not gonna get into any arguments with you. But I call it how I see it. If you've got issues with people not going into details about what they know, then just suck it up and deal with it, instead of constantly poking them and trying to antagonize them into something.

Sorry Chris for jumping to any conclusions for you. But I thought it was that obvious, and it kinda pissed me off a bit.

You're right on the money, David. There are some things that I won't talk about and there are other things that I can't talk about.

[novakjr]

Originally Posted by thetruthisoutthere

You're right on the money, David. There are some things that I won't talk about and there are other things that I can't talk about.

Sorry Chris for singling you out, and dragging you into his mess. It's been brought to my attention that the post wasn't necessarily intended for you. At least not solely.