|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
At this point, this is only trivia but 1975 Minis are probably one of the biggest headache-inducing sets that PSA has had to deal with. A while back, there were some shady card sellers who exploited the natural "shorties" phenomenon that I mentioned earlier. They trimmed away imperfections on the other taller cards and snuck them past the graders. I was the one who noticed this unfortunate trend. Around 10 years ago I contacted Joe Orlando (president at PSA) and supplied my evidence in a few emails and a phone call or two and got reimbursed for a bunch of trimmed minis in PSA holders. The graders have learned and they have adjusted so you'll probably never get even a naturally short green/yellow or red/yellow mini in a PSA holder these days. Last edited by baztacula; 03-28-2017 at 11:05 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I think it helps to have a name in the hobby. I have seen incidences that make me think it is often a rigged game.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Things seem to get really tough at the upper end of grading. I've only done a handful of modern cards and those through SGC. I had a huge batch of 81 Topps, and picked what I thought were almost perfect examples of commons that had low populations in PSA 9 and 10. (SGC has almost no population on those at all) Didn't do all that bad, but didn't do all that good either. A couple 9s, mostly 8 or 8.5, The other modern stuff also got 8s.
I'd target a few likely ones, looking at the population. For the minis it's probably worth the chance on a few as part of a bigger submission. But they have to be really almost perfect. Steve B |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Just got back a few PSA's and wanna throw up. I had a Jackie that I thought for sure was a PSA 7. I mean this card was perfect. How does it come back a 4? I louped this thing inside out. Centering corners surface, etc etc. Thought it could grab a 8 even. I swear this grading stuff is all politics. I will scan it when it arrives. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Ugh tell me about it. What does started at the top mean?
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Yes PSA is a joke but I rarely see cards under graded for people. With them it is more over grading for some submitters. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Which one of the cards were not NMMT other than the Carter out of curiosity. I put the carter as a 6 because the gloss is there and most corners.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question: Your Thoughts on selling large collection off | greenmonster66 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-25-2016 10:05 AM |
Jim Thorpe Collection..... Thoughts? | Mac927 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 8 | 05-23-2016 04:01 PM |
Peek into your collection/thoughts of 2015 | kamikidEFFL | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 07-16-2015 02:52 PM |
Fresh collection, thoughts on authenticity? | earlywynnfan | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 11 | 11-26-2013 02:54 PM |
Recommendations and thoughts for purchasing a safe for my collection | markf31 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-29-2012 03:38 PM |