|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Are anyone else's eyes starting to glaze over? This is like reading tax code.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 01-03-2019 at 09:27 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Are the 1910 COUPON (T213-1) cards really T206's ? ....I think so. ....What say you ?
Quote:
I appreciate your comment.....I did not intend to delve into all this "nitty-gritty regarding T206 / 1910 COUPON stuff. Sometimes I feel like I am in a courtroom scenario on this forum responding to this continuous "grilling" I've posted my theories on Net54 regarding T206's (and the like) since 2005. Most of them have withstood the test of time. Many people like them, and then, some others don't.....Que sera, sera Happy New Year, guy. TED Z T206 Reference . |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
It is starting to sound like a cable news show where the liberal and conservative repeat talking points at one another.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Ted, I am at fault here for getting baited in by your underhanded comments.
You used to do the same thing to Tim Cathey but he was always respectful and classy with his responses I wish I could handle it the same way but admittedly I can't. Tim was an asset to this forum and it's a shame he is no longer active here. For anyone that is new to the forum in the past few years and interested in the T206 set Tim has a great knowledge about the set that he shared in his posts and I suggest you check some of them out using his profile. http://www.net54baseball.com/member.php?u=193#stats |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Just a crazy thought I had, but if say Coupon and Red Cross cards been printed with gold borders like T205 cards would the brown captions be easier to place as T206 cards or would their hypothetical gold border cards also be excluded from the T205 set?
And yes I know that no such gold bordered cards exist with coupon and red cross backs. I just think that part of the reason for those two sets being separated in part has to do with the exclusion from the T205 set. I also think that T213, T214, and T215 should have been just simply one set named something like the blue caption set, but that may just be me over simplifying things. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Come on Pat, this is quite laughable: "getting baited in by your underhanded comments." I have never, ever INITIATED negative comments against you. That's not my style. Yes, I may have responded with some remarks, and only because you have numerous times on this forum called me a liar. But, so did your two "buddies" Rivera and Cathey. For years these two guys were very appreciative of my research into the T206 set. They would regularly pick my brain regarding T206's. Hey, I could bring up many Net54 posts dating back to 2006 as evidence of this. And then, suddenly, in 2012 they turned on me. I was especially disappointed in Jim Rivera. For many years I sold (or traded) him many, many rare back T206's at the Philly Show. When I got BROAD LEAF's, EPDG's, HINDU's, LENOX, etc., I'd save them for him. Jim thought he would give it a try being a dealer at the Philly Show, so I gladly allowed him to share my booth (circa 2009-2010). I would advertise "the Jim & Ted team" set-up at Booth #408. We had fun "Talkin T206's" for hours at the Show. I met his family and he met my wife. I recall one time when a "walk-in" brought us a bunch of T206's. I started sorting them out according to the Series they were in. One card in this lot was a PIEDMONT42 Wiltse (cap). I quickly recognized it as one of only 9 subjects known in the 460-only series....Jim was really impressed. Oh well, Jim unfortunately showed me how "appreciative" he was ! ! So, that's the story Pat. I could tell you much more, but I don't think you want to hear it. Nor do the most of the members of this forum. Good bye. TED Z T206 Reference . |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
uninformed and misleading people. The uniformed and misleading information you referred to was based on your opinion not a fact so your comments were absolutely negative. I have been posting on here for 8+ years and we have had many heated arguments but I have never called you a liar. And to be clear I'm not calling you a liar now either I'm merely saying you're wrong. I'm sure there are several people saying here we go again but I think I have the right to defend myself when you say I called you a liar several times when it never happened not once. Now I ask you something you ask me all the time show me proof. Show me where I made a negative comment towards you prior to post #68 and show me a post of mine where I called you a liar. I expect silence when you can't come up with proof but I think owe you it to me to respond when you accuse me of calling you a liar. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry guys....bringing up all this past history.
Hey guys,
I could post a number of occasions where Pat R. has responded to a theory (or statement) of mine regarding T206's where he has in effect said I was lying (or misleading). I'll only post here what I consider Pat's most egregious example questioning of my character and my dedication to inform the hobby of the complexities of the T206 set. Excerpted from thread dated 12/3/2016..... http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...=220948&page=7 Quote:
My response….. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I will conclude this with the following......I do not understand what is Pat's problem concerning me. There have been some instances where he has posted on my threads with some really meaningful stuff. But then there are times where he has impulsively been negative. And this has caused my thread to get side-tracked (as has occurred in this thread). TED Z T206 Reference . |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
What is the definition of a t206? Do we have a consensus? I always took the definition to mean a card issued by the ATC and distributed in/with packs of cigarettes between 1909-1911. Is there another definition out there?
If not, and if Coupons were produced in 1910 by the ATC, then by definition they should be t206s. I think the inclusion of Byrne, Mowrey and Rossman in the Coupon set indicates they were printed before Ted's ABCD grouping (AB, BL, Cylcle, Drum), since all three are ABCD no prints. This indicates Coupons were produced before the bulk of the 350 series. This excerpt is from Byrne, Mowrey and Rossman have been confirmed to date with a very limited number of 350 series backs that includes only Piedmont 350, Sovereign 350, Sweet Caporal 350/25, Sweet Caporal 350/30 and, in the case of Byrne and Mowrey, Tolstoi. The apparent unavailability of these subjects with a fuller complement of 350 series backs may be traceable to the depiction of these three players with teams from which they were traded in August 1909, before distribution of the 350-only subject group began. Also note that Becker(1910), Campbell(1909), Charles (1909), Dubuc (1910), Engle (1910), Huggins (1910), McIntyre (1910), Paskert (1911), LaPorte (1911) and Starr (1909) were all traded to new teams during this time. Eleven more Coupon subjects were out of baseball by the time the t206 production had ended. I do believe most t206 followers would reasonably conclude that Coupons were produced during the t206 era. ATC made a strong effort to include the right player with the right team. If they produced this set in, say 1914... it'd be all out of whack. However, a few things Pat posted makes sense to me. The Coupons fit no other 350 pattern. I'm a math guy, and the patterns of the AB.350nf, BL.350, C.350 and D.350 make reasonable sense... The Coupon back does not (*see below, good luck trying to figure it out). Why? 48 random 350 subjects, of which 45 follow the ABCD pattern. Eleven also have a Carolina Brights card (including Billy Campbell, who was out of baseball by 1909). And, I asked this question earlier in this thread, but why doesn't the Coupon back include the "350 subjects"? As Mike, "Inside the West Coast Rapper", put it earlier, "it looks like a regional issue". Somebody may surmise that the ATC, circa 1909, decided to glue a few Coupons on the end of those 100+ cigarette cartons to distribute down south with a couple of Southern Leaguers to entice the locals to buy their new "Coupon" product. Maybe, it wasn't meant to be the full "350 subjects", but just a one off. Therefore, in conclusion your honor, if Coupons were printed in 1910, by the ATC, they should be a t206 by most definitions. Pat and Ted are t206 godfathers - their knowledge of the t206s will be passed down from generation to generation. We'll carve their names... ok, going a bit far, but I hate to see the rift between them. I have learned so much from both of them and appreciate their contributions to t206 history. Last edited by t206fix; 01-04-2019 at 09:08 PM. Reason: lots a'typos |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It would be interesting to hear Scot's opinion on them. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Glaze 2 Glossing...
Quote:
The 20 Southern Leaguer's are not included in the Type 2 or Type 3 Set. That is one glaring difference in the the Type 1's vs the Type 2 & 3's. Obviously the dates are different and the 20 Type 1 Southern Leaguer's are identical to the T206 players from 1909-11, yet not included in the 1914 & 1919 Coupon sets. If you take for example the 4 SL Nashville players (Bay,Bernhard,Ellam,Perdue) from the T206 set, they match spot on to the Type 1 Coupon set, but when you get into the Type 2 1914 Coupons, Nashville players change over to Al Bridwell & Gabby Street & same for Type 3 Coupons as they feature Al & Gabby. It's like this with other players from SL teams and that makes a distinction between the 20 SL featured in Coupon that were offered in the American Litho / ATC brands later named - T206. Also, as for the New Orleans Times Picayune, there was a series of Coupon Advertisements in the 1909-10 papers depicting different Sportsmen scenarios, like hunting, horse racing, sporting events, etc. The pack is on the advertisement with T206 style cards showing and players names. One such advertisement (that I own), depicts 3 Southern Leaguer's coming out of the top of the pack. When I have time I will have to dig up the Newspaper as I don't have it scanned and its buried in a dry dark place. The Coupon Ad's were run for a handful of months around the 1909-10 time frame.
__________________
Collector of Nashville & Southern Memorabilia Last edited by DixieBaseball; 01-04-2019 at 10:14 PM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
and I was told a newspaper clipping but no one could show a coupon ad that mentioned the cards and I couldn't find where one was posted. All of the ads that I've seen are Old Mill and Hindu. There are 26 different Old Mill ads that I know of and each of them has one that mentions Texas League players and one that Doesn't. 1-4.jpg 5-8.jpg 9-12.jpg 13-16.jpg 17-20.jpg 21-24.jpg 25-26.jpg Last edited by Pat R; 01-05-2019 at 08:23 AM. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Are the 1910 COUPON (T213-1) cards really T206's ? ....I think so. ....What say you ?
Tony and Jeremy
I really appreciate your posts. Both of you have amplified on a lot of factors which I have presented here in my earlier posts. Jeremy....it would be great if you can show us your New Orleans Times Picayune papers with the Coupon Advertisements (1909-1910 ) depicting different Sportsmen scenarios. Thanks again, TED Z T206 Reference . |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I agree 100% if such an ad exist I would change my opinion and say they should be included in the T206 set and they were just another T206 rule breaker. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Pat - Thanks for all the advertisement examples of OM & Hindu... I think that may be what I have buried in my collection. I will dig it up at some point and verify... Too big to scan, and I haven't looked at it in years... Regardless of an advertisement, sure that is clear proof, but Coupon Type 1 cards are so rare, I doubt they had a Advertising campaign like the other ATC brands. While it would be nice to have a clearly dated advertisement as proof, I think its clear by the Federal league example aforementioned and the 4 Nashville players mirroring the T206 4 Nashville players that its more likely the Coupons were produced around 1909-11 than around 1913-19 like the Type 2 and 3's with blue lettering and glossy/thicker cardboard. It's only a matter of time as type 1's lean way more towards the 1910 date, than they do any other date imho. Thanks, J
__________________
Collector of Nashville & Southern Memorabilia Last edited by DixieBaseball; 01-07-2019 at 04:48 PM. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Hindu Ad
Here's a couple of Hindu Ads both picture Southern League players but only
one mentions them. img653.jpg img654.jpg |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interesting trivia about 1910 COUPON (T213-1) cards...show us some of these rare gems | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 112 | 05-31-2021 06:33 AM |
FYI....1910 COUPON checklist (T213-1) | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 09-03-2014 09:22 PM |
FS: 1910 T213-1 Type 1 Coupon | usernamealreadytaken | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 07-20-2012 03:16 PM |
F/S....1910 COUPON (T213-1) cards | tedzan | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-21-2011 01:58 PM |
T213-1 (1910 Type 1 Coupon) | usernamealreadytaken | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 11-02-2011 08:18 AM |