NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-31-2021, 06:13 AM
mrreality68's Avatar
mrreality68 mrreality68 is offline
Jeffrey Kuhr
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 5,644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquarian Sports Cards View Post
Did it actually sell/meet reserve?
Good Point.

WE know it had a reserve on it "that was not met" going into the last day.

Perhaps it was removed.

But it does show as final price with buyers premium as $1,102,806. Which gives the impression that is sold at,

That is a good price for that card as "restored"
__________________
Thanks all

Jeff Kuhr

https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/

Looking for
1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards
1933 Uncle Jacks Candy Babe Ruth Card
1921 Frederick Foto Ruth
Joe Jackson Cards 1916 Advertising Backs
1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson
1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson
1915 Cracker Jack Joe Jackson
1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson
Shoeless Joe Jackson Autograph
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-31-2021, 07:50 AM
Rhotchkiss's Avatar
Rhotchkiss Rhotchkiss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 4,306
Default

Agreed Jeff. By the way it’s presented on the site, it appears it was sold (reserve met or eliminated)

The final price was over 2.5x what this restored Wagner sold for in December of 2018 ($420k). Putting things in that context, I think the SCP Wagner did relatively well
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 4E6FCC62-46DE-4596-8131-5342CC527036.jpg (9.5 KB, 428 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-31-2021, 08:12 AM
chriskim chriskim is offline
Chris Kim
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 533
Default

SPC said reserve met at $919k. Final price is $1,102,806.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-31-2021, 11:19 AM
JimC JimC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 257
Default

I know I'm late to this party but house bidding is gross and shouldn't be allowed.

That Wagner has buyer's remorse written all over it. Of course one good flip will cure any case of buyer's remorse . . .

Jim Creamer
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-31-2021, 12:53 PM
CardPadre CardPadre is offline
Will.i.@m $t@dy
Member
 
Join Date: May 2021
Location: San Diego/Albuquerque
Posts: 368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss View Post
Agreed Jeff. By the way it’s presented on the site, it appears it was sold (reserve met or eliminated)

The final price was over 2.5x what this restored Wagner sold for in December of 2018 ($420k). Putting things in that context, I think the SCP Wagner did relatively well
I don't keep up with Wagners but curious if you think it would have had a similar gain over that time in original condition or done better/worse? What's the lowest recent sale on a beat up Wagner?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-31-2021, 05:55 PM
Rhotchkiss's Avatar
Rhotchkiss Rhotchkiss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 4,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CardPadre View Post
I don't keep up with Wagners but curious if you think it would have had a similar gain over that time in original condition or done better/worse? What's the lowest recent sale on a beat up Wagner?
There has been a small explosion of Wagner sales in the past 1.5 years and the value of the card has gone up a ton. I think the sales price of this restored Wagner vs the one in 2018 (almost 3x) is on par with the relative apperception of all Wagners, regardless of grade.

Regarding the value of this card restored vs it’s original condition, I think it would sell for more in its original condition.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-03-2021, 08:02 AM
Hankphenom Hankphenom is offline
Hank Thomas
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss View Post
Regarding the value of this card restored vs it’s original condition, I think it would sell for more in its original condition.
This. And I hope it might serve as a warning.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-03-2021, 09:19 AM
mrreality68's Avatar
mrreality68 mrreality68 is offline
Jeffrey Kuhr
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 5,644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hankphenom View Post
This. And I hope it might serve as a warning.
+1 I agree with Hank

Hopefully it is a warning/learning for others
__________________
Thanks all

Jeff Kuhr

https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/

Looking for
1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards
1933 Uncle Jacks Candy Babe Ruth Card
1921 Frederick Foto Ruth
Joe Jackson Cards 1916 Advertising Backs
1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson
1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson
1915 Cracker Jack Joe Jackson
1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson
Shoeless Joe Jackson Autograph
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-01-2021, 11:08 AM
Jcosta19's Avatar
Jcosta19 Jcosta19 is offline
Justin
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss View Post
Agreed Jeff. By the way it’s presented on the site, it appears it was sold (reserve met or eliminated)



The final price was over 2.5x what this restored Wagner sold for in December of 2018 ($420k). Putting things in that context, I think the SCP Wagner did relatively well
Just a guess but I think this (the 2018) restored Wagner would sell for significantly more than the SCP one because the image, especially the face, are still original. The restoration for that one was adding cut off borders and a clean back primarily.



Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-01-2021, 04:24 PM
chadeast's Avatar
chadeast chadeast is offline
Ch@d
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: California
Posts: 759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrreality68 View Post
But it does show as final price with buyers premium as $1,102,806. Which gives the impression that is sold at,

That is a good price for that card as "restored"
Agreed. And $62k for the bleached out '33 Goudey #144 Ruth is just stunning to me.
__________________
successful deals with hcv123, rholmes, robw1959, Yankees1964, theuclakid, Brian Van Horn, h2oya311, thecapeleague, Gkoz316, chesbro41, edjs, wazoo, becollie, t206kid, vintageismygame, Neal, bradmar48, iconsportscards, wrapperguy, agrebene, T3fan, T3s, ccre, Leon, wolf441, cammb, tonyo, markf31,gonzo,scmavl & others

currently working on:
E101 (33/50)
T3 set (104/104), complete!
T205 set (108/221)
'33 Goudey
collecting W600s, Walter Johnson
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-01-2021, 04:32 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chadeast View Post
Agreed. And $62k for the bleached out '33 Goudey #144 Ruth is just stunning to me.
I thought it was a worse buy than the Wagner. Just an awful looking card. There is no way someone is excited to put that in their collection. Pure registry or investment (LOL)
.
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-01-2021, 04:34 PM
mrreality68's Avatar
mrreality68 mrreality68 is offline
Jeffrey Kuhr
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 5,644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon View Post
I thought it was a worse buy than the Wagner. Just an awful looking card. There is no way someone is excited to put that in their collection. Pure registry or investment (LOL)
.
Agreed 100% that Goudey was not to standards and went for way to much
__________________
Thanks all

Jeff Kuhr

https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/

Looking for
1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards
1933 Uncle Jacks Candy Babe Ruth Card
1921 Frederick Foto Ruth
Joe Jackson Cards 1916 Advertising Backs
1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson
1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson
1915 Cracker Jack Joe Jackson
1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson
Shoeless Joe Jackson Autograph
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-01-2021, 04:56 PM
chadeast's Avatar
chadeast chadeast is offline
Ch@d
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: California
Posts: 759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon View Post
I thought it was a worse buy than the Wagner. Just an awful looking card. There is no way someone is excited to put that in their collection. Pure registry or investment (LOL)
.
Much worse buy. Extremely rare vs. relatively common. I'm not sure I've ever seen a more obvious example of buying the holder instead of the card.
__________________
successful deals with hcv123, rholmes, robw1959, Yankees1964, theuclakid, Brian Van Horn, h2oya311, thecapeleague, Gkoz316, chesbro41, edjs, wazoo, becollie, t206kid, vintageismygame, Neal, bradmar48, iconsportscards, wrapperguy, agrebene, T3fan, T3s, ccre, Leon, wolf441, cammb, tonyo, markf31,gonzo,scmavl & others

currently working on:
E101 (33/50)
T3 set (104/104), complete!
T205 set (108/221)
'33 Goudey
collecting W600s, Walter Johnson
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-02-2021, 09:15 AM
MattyC's Avatar
MattyC MattyC is offline
Matt
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,377
Default

Yes but someone gets to log that sticker into their Registry Set and now say their card and set is “better.” The joke’s on that “winner” because there are 3s and 4s that blow that 7 away. Funny things happen when people let PSA override their eyeballs. Even funnier is that’s a high sticker grade and there are way more than enough sticker collectors aka “investors” out there for the winner to flip it in a few years for a tidy profit.

Last edited by MattyC; 11-02-2021 at 09:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-02-2021, 09:40 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
Yes but someone gets to log that sticker into their Registry Set and now say their card and set is “better.” The joke’s on that “winner” because there are 3s and 4s that blow that 7 away. Funny things happen when people let PSA override their eyeballs. Even funnier is that’s a high sticker grade and there are way more than enough sticker collectors aka “investors” out there for the winner to flip it in a few years for a tidy profit.
I labeled my SCP picture as Ruth crap LOL....

That 7 cost 3x more than my card and both are recent purchases...makes sense to me
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ruthcrap2.jpg (55.8 KB, 221 views)
File Type: jpg r319ruth2.jpg (79.3 KB, 222 views)
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-02-2021, 11:09 AM
chadeast's Avatar
chadeast chadeast is offline
Ch@d
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: California
Posts: 759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon View Post
I labeled my SCP picture as Ruth crap LOL....

That 7 cost 3x more than my card and both are recent purchases...makes sense to me
Beautiful upgrade, Leon. And as an added bonus, your Ruth isn't trimmed!
__________________
successful deals with hcv123, rholmes, robw1959, Yankees1964, theuclakid, Brian Van Horn, h2oya311, thecapeleague, Gkoz316, chesbro41, edjs, wazoo, becollie, t206kid, vintageismygame, Neal, bradmar48, iconsportscards, wrapperguy, agrebene, T3fan, T3s, ccre, Leon, wolf441, cammb, tonyo, markf31,gonzo,scmavl & others

currently working on:
E101 (33/50)
T3 set (104/104), complete!
T205 set (108/221)
'33 Goudey
collecting W600s, Walter Johnson
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-02-2021, 12:13 PM
brianp-beme's Avatar
brianp-beme brianp-beme is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon View Post
I labeled my SCP picture as Ruth crap LOL....

That 7 cost 3x more than my card and both are recent purchases...makes sense to me
Great card Leon. I think I even prefer my slim waisted, two piece Ruth over that faded, blurry, suspiciously small 62k Babe.

Brian
Attached Images
File Type: jpg baberuthgoudey003 (335x400).jpg (29.1 KB, 217 views)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-02-2021, 09:50 AM
Rhotchkiss's Avatar
Rhotchkiss Rhotchkiss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 4,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
Yes but someone gets to log that sticker into their Registry Set and now say their card and set is “better.” The joke’s on that “winner” because there are 3s and 4s that blow that 7 away. Funny things happen when people let PSA override their eyeballs. Even funnier is that’s a high sticker grade and there are way more than enough sticker collectors aka “investors” out there for the winner to flip it in a few years for a tidy profit.
Agree 100% with both bolded points.

My only PSA registry set (and my only experience with the PSA registry) is my 524-card T206 set. I can attest first-hand that registry rankings is a very strong drug and has lead me to buy (hell over pay for) some cards, as "upgrades", purely for the number on flip. In my opinion, the registry is genius for this exact reason (and I do not like to give PSA credit for anything). Because of the registry, some people buy only PSA and they are constantly upgrading to see their name climb the registry leader board.

I also agree that because of the registry, the winner of the 33 Goudey PSA 7 will likely sell it for a profit down the line. Another reason why the registry is so genius -- it allows for some risk mitigation on resale because your potential buyers are not only people who want the card, but also registry collectors. If you pick the right sets -- like T206, 1933 Goudey, 1952 Topps -- there should always be enough people out there putting together registry sets so that the likelihood of selling your over graded card at a profit (or at least break even) is increased, if not almost guaranteed.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Restored T206 Wagner? Jobu Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 19 02-10-2020 07:16 AM
H. WAGNER, RESTORED or TAMPERED WITH? pepis Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 5 02-21-2013 12:26 AM
1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? Orioles1954 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 39 08-29-2010 04:30 PM
Would the Wagner had sold for more had it not been restored? martyogelvie Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 06-26-2010 10:10 AM
December auctions - T206 Honus Wagner cards PSA 4 and PSA 1 Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 12 11-17-2004 05:49 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 AM.


ebay GSB