NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
 Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
 Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
 Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used > Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports
Reload this Page Are these Babe Ruth's Authentic?
Register NEW Chat! Who's Chatting FAQ Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2017, 08:59 AM
Jaymz023 Jaymz023 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 26
Default Are these Babe Ruth's Authentic?
Here are a few babe Ruth's out in the world that are for sale.

The first one the guy says his grandfather got personally at a game. Have you seen an example like it before?

The others all happen to be signed with "Sincerely" and all look dang similar.

Thoughts on the authenticity? Any help is appreciated!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image3(3).jpg (5.9 KB, 262 views)
File Type: jpg image2(2).jpg (7.0 KB, 261 views)
File Type: jpg image1.jpg (3.9 KB, 265 views)
File Type: jpg image1(2).jpg (5.3 KB, 263 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-27-2017, 09:11 AM
packs packs is online now
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,389
Default
No speculation on authenticity but from my POV it looks like a different person signed each of those signatures.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-27-2017, 09:16 AM
Bpm0014's Avatar
Bpm0014 Bpm0014 is offline
Brendan Mullen
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,855
Default
#1 is definitely 100% NOT real.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-27-2017, 09:22 AM
Jaymz023 Jaymz023 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 26
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bpm0014 View Post
#1 is definitely 100% NOT real.
I was thinking the same thing on that one....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-27-2017, 01:22 PM
Jaymz023 Jaymz023 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 26
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
No speculation on authenticity but from my POV it looks like a different person signed each of those signatures.
If you saw my signature you would say the same thing hahaha
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-27-2017, 01:52 PM
Bpm0014's Avatar
Bpm0014 Bpm0014 is offline
Brendan Mullen
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,855
Default
Now that I have time to look, #2 is 100% no good as well.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-27-2017, 02:13 PM
GrayGhost's Avatar
GrayGhost GrayGhost is offline
Scott
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Connecticut.
Posts: 9,144
Default
Just a mainly uneducated opinion. The only one that Looks possibly good to me as number three.
__________________
Baseball is our saving Grace!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-27-2017, 02:36 PM
Steve D's Avatar
Steve D Steve D is offline
5t3v3...D4.w50n
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,894
Default
I agree with the previous opinions that #1, #2 and #4 are bad.

I'm not convinced that #3 is good. I do seem to see some signs of shakiness/slowness in it, that make me think it's bad, but I'm not really sure.

Steve
__________________
Successful BST deals with eliotdeutsch, gonzo, jimivintage, Leon, lharris3600, markf31, Mrc32, sb1, seablaster, shammus, veloce.

Current Wantlist:
1909 Obak Howard (Los Angeles) (no frame on back)
1910 E90-2 Gibson, Hyatt, Maddox
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-27-2017, 05:36 PM
David Atkatz's Avatar
David Atkatz David Atkatz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,099
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrayGhost View Post
Just a mainly uneducated opinion. The only one that Looks possibly good to me as number three.
To paraphrase the Cheeto-in-Chief, "We love the uneducated opinions."
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
shonen babe ruth authentic? JoeyF1981 Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 7 05-09-2014 12:14 PM
Babe Ruth authentic? Shoeless Moe Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports 7 02-22-2014 06:45 AM
1928 Fro Joy Babe Ruth - Authentic? Clutch-Hitter Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 27 07-05-2011 10:30 PM
Babe Ruth W573 SGC Authentic Archive 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 06-25-2008 02:25 PM
Could this 1933 Babe Ruth be authentic? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 8 08-01-2005 08:03 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 PM.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top

ebay GSB