NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2014, 05:56 PM
1963Topps Set 1963Topps Set is offline
Tom
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: America
Posts: 1,125
Default 1959 Fleer Set

I personally think this is the worst set of the 1950s. I don't like that it is based on ONE player, I don't care how great they are. Some don't actually consider this a "set", I do. The photos are very drab and the design is poor. What is your take on this set?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-07-2014, 06:12 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 8,996
Default 1959 Fleer

Not my favorite set, but it sold better than their 63 effort.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-07-2014, 06:12 PM
kailes2872's Avatar
kailes2872 kailes2872 is offline
Kev1n @1les
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pittsburgh Area
Posts: 759
Default

I agree that it isn't very appealing to the eye, however, in my mostly uninformed opinion, I think that it is undervalued. When you think about what the '54 #1 & #250, '55 #2, 56 #5, 57&58 #1 plus the AS cards sell for - and then compare what the '59 fleer cards sold for, it seems like a bargain. I am comparing apples & oranges, I know...
__________________
2024 Collecting Goals:

53-55 Red Mans Complete Set
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2014, 06:56 AM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is online now
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,902
Default

The best set from the 50's by far. Hope to own one some day. Yes it is based on one player but that player was by far the best of his era.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2014, 01:27 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 8,996
Default 59 Fleer

One of these Ted signs is counterfeit....which one ?

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2014, 01:37 PM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is online now
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,902
Default

I would pay a lot less for the bottom one.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2014, 01:55 PM
Griffins Griffins is offline
Anthøny N. ex
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,285
Default

2nd one down. I remember when these were faked, Summer of '75. The guy had sold a bunch of them at the Philly show, and by the time he got to the LA show a few weeks later suspicions were high, and the promoters banned them from the show. Turned out to be for good reason.
I think they were sold by a guy from Detroit named Whelan.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-08-2014, 03:56 PM
bobsbbcards's Avatar
bobsbbcards bobsbbcards is offline
Bob F.
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,987
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALR-bishop View Post
One of these Ted signs is counterfeit....which one ?
The third one.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-08-2014, 05:03 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 8,996
Default Williams

Some people see things as they are and wonder why. Bob dreams of things that never were and says.....there it is.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-19-2016, 08:46 PM
pclpads pclpads is online now
Dave Foster
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: left coast
Posts: 966
Default

[QUOTE=bnorth;1352254]The best set from the 50's by far. /QUOTE]

Really?? I mean really and truly?? Over '52T et al?????
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-19-2016, 09:06 PM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is online now
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,902
Default

[QUOTE=pclpads;1586629]
Quote:
Originally Posted by bnorth View Post
The best set from the 50's by far. /QUOTE]

Really?? I mean really and truly?? Over '52T et al?????
Yes easily over the 52 Topps set. Seriously there are 80 cards of the greatest hitter ever and they tell his life story. As a Ted Williams fan I could not imagine a better set from the 50's.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-20-2016, 06:59 AM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 8,996
Default

Some people have no imagination
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-20-2016, 11:56 AM
DBesse27's Avatar
DBesse27 DBesse27 is offline
Dan Be$$e++e
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,158
Default

[QUOTE=pclpads;1586629]
Quote:
Originally Posted by bnorth View Post
The best set from the 50's by far. /QUOTE]

Really?? I mean really and truly?? Over '52T et al?????
Yes. The cards are beautiful, much more so than 52 Topps or anything else. No commons; every card is a HOFer. And cameos by Babe Ruth, Jimmie foxx, Sam Snead and John Wayne.
__________________
Actively collecting Carl Yastrzemski !
Also 1964 & 68 Topps Venezuelans
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-20-2016, 12:21 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 8,996
Default

Don't forget that big fish
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-28-2016, 07:00 AM
jason.1969's Avatar
jason.1969 jason.1969 is offline
Jason A. Schwartz
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 1,894
Default

I like this set a lot. The Williams/Ruth card is a favorite, and for some reason I have a disproportionate love for "How Ted Hit .400."

Had thought about turning my 20 or so cards into a set but was put off by the rare Ted Signs card. Decided I didn't love the set quite enough to throw down big $$.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
__________________
Thanks,
Jason

Collecting interests and want lists at https://jasoncards.wordpress.com/201...nd-want-lists/
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-28-2016, 07:35 AM
Paul S Paul S is offline
P. Sp.ec.tor
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Landlocked by High Toll Fees
Posts: 2,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jason.1969 View Post
I like this set a lot. The Williams/Ruth card is a favorite, and for some reason I have a disproportionate love for "How Ted Hit .400."

Had thought about turning my 20 or so cards into a set but was put off by the rare Ted Signs card. Decided I didn't love the set quite enough to throw down big $$.
Personally, I don't think #68 is all that rare. It is pretty much readily available anytime. IIRC, the myth was propagated in the 60s by dealers who would advertise in the trade pubs to get a premium on it more than warranted, and the legend remains today. Tougher than the rest? Sure, but not that tough at all. I think I paid about $38 for my complete set (now gone) in the 60s - the other cards were very cheap but #68 almost doubled the price.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-23-2016, 08:18 AM
JustinD's Avatar
JustinD JustinD is offline
Ju$tin D@v3n.por+
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Birmingham, Mi
Posts: 2,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul S View Post
Personally, I don't think #68 is all that rare. It is pretty much readily available anytime. IIRC, the myth was propagated in the 60s by dealers who would advertise in the trade pubs to get a premium on it more than warranted, and the legend remains today. Tougher than the rest? Sure, but not that tough at all. I think I paid about $38 for my complete set (now gone) in the 60s - the other cards were very cheap but #68 almost doubled the price.
I would say it's still pretty darn rare in comparison to most any other regularly issued card in the span around it.

Adjusted for inflation your 38 bucks if it was say 65', is 300 today. Which is still a good price.
__________________
- Justin D.


Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander.

Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-28-2016, 07:46 AM
DBesse27's Avatar
DBesse27 DBesse27 is offline
Dan Be$$e++e
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jason.1969 View Post
I like this set a lot. The Williams/Ruth card is a favorite, and for some reason I have a disproportionate love for "How Ted Hit .400."

Had thought about turning my 20 or so cards into a set but was put off by the rare Ted Signs card. Decided I didn't love the set quite enough to throw down big $$.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
I spent about $400 on 79 raw cards and $135 on a PSA 1 of #68.
__________________
Actively collecting Carl Yastrzemski !
Also 1964 & 68 Topps Venezuelans
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-22-2016, 09:44 AM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 8,996
Default 1959 Fleer

I had a 6 card p0ack with my set but was recently able to add a 8 card wrapper

Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-22-2016, 05:31 PM
irv's Avatar
irv irv is offline
D@le Irv*n
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 6,699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALR-bishop View Post
I had a 6 card p0ack with my set but was recently able to add a 8 card wrapper

Very nice, Al!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-22-2016, 06:53 PM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is online now
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irv View Post
Very nice, Al!
+1 great pick up Al.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB: 1959 Fleer Ted Williams #68 dnanln 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 11-11-2013 06:50 PM
WTB: 1959 Fleer Ted Williams #68 dnanln 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 04-18-2013 06:33 PM
1959 Fleer Ted Williams brob28 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 6 09-28-2011 09:04 AM
F/S: (4) 1959 Fleer Ted Williams SGC 96s vintagewhitesox 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 3 08-15-2011 08:55 PM
WTB: 1959 Fleer Ted Williams #68 PSA 9 or SGC 96 Kalineman 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 12-30-2010 06:25 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:52 PM.


ebay GSB