NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-09-2014, 01:38 PM
darkhorse9 darkhorse9 is offline
Mark
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 844
Default It's 1953..and you have a nickel..

I'm curious as to people's thoughts on this.

Imagine it was 1953 and you were eight years old. You had seen a couple of the cards from both Bowman and Topps that your friends had and finally got a nickel to buy your own pack.

You run to the store and see boxes of both Bowman and Topps sitting there. Which one gets your nickel?

Remember...at this time there were no checklists so you had no idea which players were in which, and you certainly had no idea about future value since they would go into your shoe box.

Which one would you pick and why?


For me..I'd probably go with Bowman. Big clear color photos were quite a change. Also, that other one was just drawings. Boooring.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-09-2014, 02:10 PM
Vintagevault13's Avatar
Vintagevault13 Vintagevault13 is offline
€d M!££w00D
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 522
Default

Interesting thread. Taking away current knowledge/preferences, I would probably have gone with Bowman and not the "new upstart" in 1953 since color photography was relatively new to cards at that time. Having said that, if I could go back in a time machine I would buy all the Topps I could get my hands on (Paige, Mantle, etc.).


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Happy Collecting

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-09-2014, 02:13 PM
Brianruns10 Brianruns10 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 343
Default

'53 Topps in the hopes of scoring that Mantle card. Not to mention I'd be interested in finding out for myself if some anecdotes are true about the first series of '53s have some high number '52s added into the mix.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-09-2014, 03:42 PM
GasHouseGang's Avatar
GasHouseGang GasHouseGang is offline
David M.
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: S. California
Posts: 2,871
Default

Knowing what I know now, and with my current prefences, it would be the 1953 Bowmans. However, when I was 8 I probably would have chosen the Topps cards since they are so colorful, and I liked the drawn cards. I'm thinking of the Batman cards that were out when I was a kid. I bought the "Black Bat" variety that were like comic book drawings, and I didn't like the photo's from the actual T.V. show nearly as much.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-09-2014, 04:17 PM
KCRfan1 KCRfan1 is offline
Lou Simcoe
L0u Sim.coe
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Olathe KS
Posts: 1,713
Default

I would go for the Bowman. In 1953, Topps is the new kid on the block and Bowman is what I am familiar with ( in all of my 8 years hypothetically ). Even at my pretend 8 years of age in 1953, I would hope that I would recognize the 1953 Bowmans as the most beautiful set ever produced at the time, and now, to date IMO.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-09-2014, 04:26 PM
Republicaninmass Republicaninmass is offline
T3d $h3rm@n
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,235
Default

53 topps, because (supposedly) they could hold 52 hi numbers!
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" ©

Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1953 ACC Ads toppcat Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 1 07-11-2012 09:07 PM
1953 ACC Ads toppcat Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 07-10-2012 12:16 PM
If I only had a nickel..... Bigdaddy Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 22 01-22-2012 09:26 PM
1953 topps mantle 1953 PSA purchase... some frosting KYLE1707 Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 4 04-30-2011 03:38 PM
1953 Robinson PSA 2, 1953 Black PSa 5 SOLD thanks guys Republicaninmass 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 1 04-27-2011 10:47 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:09 AM.


ebay GSB