|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
1956 Topps Clemente
I’m bidding on a 1956 Clemente at a particular online auction house.
The card is slabbed and is a PSA 7. It’s an older PSA label. In the description it’s listed and the photos show it as a gray back. When I looked it up in the PSA database it’s listed as a white back. They have sold another ‘56 Clemente that was like that. Should I be concerned? Thoughts? Comments? Thanks Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
If the auction pics and slab look good, I wouldn’t worry about it. They’ve been known to screw that kind of thing up in the PSA records.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar vintage stars & HOF'ers. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
PSA did not always recognize the difference; so the ones that got graded, say more than 10 years ago, only have the set name and not the variation on the flip.
If you buy it and then send to PSA and pay the reslabbing fee ($8+shipping), they will update the flip to Gray Back for you.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
And inferring your other concern, I suspect a mid-grade + non-rookie + relatively high-pop item like this doesn't lend itself to forgery or funny-business since the margin is low compared to the presumable amount of effort involved... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|