NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-25-2007, 01:57 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Matt

If someone on the board has a suspicion that an ongoing auction is questionable (due to forgery, alteration, shill bidding, etc.) would you prefer that be posted on this forum, "outing" the auction, or not be reported?

edited for clarification:
This poll is about reasonable suspicion; obviously if someone has 100% proof of a forgery, no one is going to be bothered by said auction being "outed." The poll here is on a strong suspicion of one of the above; as Peter suggests, the OP is 75% sure, but it is not conclusive.

Vote:
A) Never out any auction
B) Only out forgery/alteration with 75% or above confidence but never out shilling, even with 99.9% certainty.
C) Out forgery/alteration/shilling with 75% or above confidence

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:01 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: MVSNYC

absolutely "Yea"...

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:03 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Steve Murray

Yea.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:03 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Joann

Matt,

Obviously this is in response to my comments in the Std Biscuit Cobb thread. I will reiterate, just because I don't want there to be any misunderstanding, that my comments were not about what you posting that particular thread.

You explained yourself in the other thread and did something in good faith and in the spirit of help. I was just commenting on the possible outcome.

Joann

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:05 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Al Simeone

Matt,
I would be in favor of it just for Forgery and alterations.
But I wouldnt be for shill bidding. It goes on all the time and is very hard to prove.
so yea for the top 2
nea for shill

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:08 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: peter chao

Matt,

It's yea, but you need to be at least 75% sure.

Peter C.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:12 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: boxingcardman

If the card is something you know is wrong, or the seller has a bad history of which you are personally aware, then it is a nice thing to do. Otherwise, it just invites an argument about "outing" an auction in progress. If in doubt, I'd err on the side of not outing an ongoing auction.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:15 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Jim VB

I'm with Al. Forgeries and alteration have one threshold of evidence. Shill bidding has a higher limit. It's too hard to ascertain.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:16 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Marty

I agree with Al. I doubt that anyone here will pay more than they are willing to because they have been shilled. It is almost imposible to prove. I am currently receiving unwanted bidding activity. I have a low grade 53 Bowman Color Mantle that is just over $100 with more than 40 bids. I know for a fact that I am not having this auction shilled. Just because it looks like shilling does not mean 100% that it is.

Fake and altered cards could be pointed out with no issue if you are positive that you are correct. If you just want a second opinion, email some one. That way you do not out a good auction.
Marty

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:18 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Matt

Tabulating (the poll in it's present form):

Yea (3):
MVSNYC
Steve Murray
peter chao


Nay (4):
Al Simeone
boxingcardman
Jim VB
Marty

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:25 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Jim VB

NO, No, No!


Al, Jim and Marty all had qualifiers allowing outing for all but shill bidding. <LOL>

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:25 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: barrysloate

"Suspicion" and "questionable" are not enough proof for me.

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:29 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Matt

Jim - you can only vote once!
As the poll is formulated, were talking about cases where the information is not conclusive, but the OP is 75% certain. Are you suggesting that if you're 75% sure its a forgery you're OK with outing it, but if you're 75% sure there is shill bidding it shouldn't be outed?
I understand that doctoring or forging is more conclusive generally, but if the case we're talking about is where it's not conclusive, what's the difference between outing that listing vs. a listing where you're 75% sure shill bidding is occurring?

barry - nobody is asking you to convict anyone off of "suspicion" or "questionable" the poll question is, would you rather know that the item is seen that way by board members (the discussion would obviously follow the outing) or would you rather not know at all?

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:30 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Al Simeone

Thanks Jim! Yes Matt please re read what I and the others said.

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:34 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Al Simeone

Matt,
I want a re count!!! There was a "HANGING CHAD" on my vote. And if thats the case Im a YEA!!!

Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:35 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Matt

Al - I think your 4:29 post and my 4:30 post crossed in cyberspace. Please read my response to Jim in that post.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:36 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Jim VB

Matt,

If I can only vote once then you can't ask me three part questions!

I'll leave all questions about the difference between "preponderance of the evidence" and "beyond a reasonable doubt" up to Jeff L. His parents put him through law school. Mine did not. He's good at it. I'm not.

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:37 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Matt

Jim - it's a 1 part poll at the top of this thread (plus I used a smiley when I said that!). The questions I asked in my response to your post were for understanding your position. If you would answer those questions it would help me understand,.
thanks!

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:40 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Joe D.

Absolutely 'NAY' - with regard to shill bidding.
would not want to see that reported.

As far as Forgery or Alteration - I vote Yea.

Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:41 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Matt

As many seem to be splitting their vote, I'm hoping someone who is doing so can answer the question I posed above, namely:

"As the poll is formulated, were talking about cases where the information is not conclusive, but the OP is 75% certain. Are you suggesting that if you're 75% sure its a forgery you're OK with outing it, but if you're 75% sure there is shill bidding it shouldn't be outed?
I understand that doctoring or forging is more conclusive generally, but if the case we're talking about is where it's not conclusive, what's the difference between outing that listing vs. a listing where you're 75% sure shill bidding is occurring?"

Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:42 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Al Simeone

Matt,
I just re read it and it says "on a strong suspicion of one of the above" Im in favor of 2 of the 3 above . So hence forth and to wit in the presence of 2of the 3!! Our votes should be changed! Help me Jeff L. I need a few more legal phrases!!!

Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:42 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Jim VB

<<Are you suggesting that if you're 75% sure its a forgery you're OK with outing it, but if you're 75% sure there is shill bidding it shouldn't be outed? >>


That question?

My answer is "Yes!"

I have seen cases where I am 75%, or more, sure that an item is a forgery, or altered. I have no problem outing those.

I can't conceive of an instance where I'd be 75%,or more, sure of shill bidding.

Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:42 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: barrysloate

My point was that if it is not definitive, then I wouldn't care, and therefore wouldn't want to know. It could be misinformation.

I need to clarify my response. If there was a suspicion that a card was altered, that is important. If there is a suspicion of shill bidding, but no proof, I would not need to know. In that situation I can take care of myself. If a lot is worth a dollar to me, I will bid a dollar and walk away.

Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:44 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Rob

I guess i'm pointing towards "nay". Like Al & company said, doctoring/forgery/alterations should be outed. Those auctions are offering items different than whats is stated/shown.

But if I think an item is worth $x to me, and i get it for that price or less, I'm happy. If there is 99%+ proof that I got shilled, then I dunno what I'd do, but I still got the item for less than what I wanted to pay. Outing it may make the price go even higher than the shill due to new bidders!!!

Rob

Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:45 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Matt

Jim - If the OP WAS 75% sure or more of shill bidding you'd still rather not have the listing outed?

Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:48 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Jon Canfield

Just my personal opinion but I have no problem with outing auctions at all. This board finds every auction in every obscure category. Sure, you can argue that by posting on this board, it will get 1000 views from the public exposure when maybe 1, 5 or 10 other board members might have discovered it the auction if it had not been outed. But out of those thousand views, how many are actually interested in that piece? Also, there are times when auctions are outed to discover more about a piece or ask what the heck the item is. I know many will argue that instead of outing a particularly rare piece of memorabilia or card publically for all to see, you should privately email a board member to get their opinion on value, authenticity, what it is, etc. The problem I sometimes find is if I have no freakin idea what the piece is, how the heck do I know who to email?

There are great arguements against outing auctions and I respect those that are totally against it. But I also personally have nothing against anyone who outs an auction.

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:51 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: MVSNYC

i want to clarify, i agree with Joe D:

"NAY- with regard to shill bidding.
would not want to see that reported. As far as Forgery or Alteration - I vote YEA."

Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:52 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Joe D.

to be clear -

if you are 100% certain there is a shill going on in a live auction.

I would not want to see it posted.


Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:53 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Matt

Thanks you for clarifying Joe D. I will re tabulate shortly with 3 possible voting "buckets"

Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:54 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: martindl


I don't mean to gunk up a good yea or nay thread with perspective, but as Marty P pointed out, the appearance of shilling does not mean that thats what is happening.

I sell postcards and I've had an instance in the last month where I was blessed with a zero feedback bidder who for some reason liked my offerings. He/She decided to bid on a bunch of random offerings (some town views, some Greetings, some Foreign, etc.) and by all appearances it sure looked like shilling. It wasn't, but I bet it kept some bidders away and some that won probably felt like they got run up.

I vote yea on the obvious forgeries, nay on anything that might look like shilling.

Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:57 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Matt

martin - what about forgeries that are only 75% certain?

Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:57 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Steve Murray

No way. I hereby amend my response:

I want to clarify, I agree with Joe D:

"NAY- with regard to shill bidding.
would not want to see that reported. As far as Forgery or Alteration - I vote YEA."

Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-25-2007, 03:00 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Al Simeone

Matt,
It looks likw what I stated from the beguining. Make a poll change, to leave out the shill biding or make it a seperate catagory. What you may find is 95%-100% are in favor of outing the auction based on forgery and alteration.

Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-25-2007, 03:00 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Josh Adams

I say yes, out the auction.

On another note, I don't see what is so bad about outing an ongoing auction anyways, regardless of possible shilling or any other type of shenanigans?

Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-25-2007, 03:02 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Matt

Tabulating:

A (3):
Marty
boxingcardman
martindl

B (7):
Steve Murray
Joe D.
MVSNYC
Rob
barrysloate
Jim VB
Al Simeone

C (2):
Jon Canfield
Josh Adams

Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-25-2007, 03:04 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: MVSNYC

"75% certain"...

how can we quantify this percentage anyway...?

how do we know what is 75% vs. 70% or 80%, for that matter?

Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-25-2007, 03:06 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Al Simeone

I guess us "B"s are considered YEANEAs!!!!

Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-25-2007, 03:08 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Matt

MVSYNC - I assume by the smiley you're being facetious? Obviously you can't concretely quantify it. The point is you think it's "reasonable likely" meaning, you have evidence to support that but it's not 100% conclusive, but it's also more then a 50/50 possibility, which I suppose means you'd be willing to bet money on it. We work on such assumptions every day.


Do I have everybody in the correct "bucket" now?

Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-25-2007, 03:09 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Jim VB

<<If the OP WAS 75% sure or more of shill bidding you'd still rather not have the listing outed?>>


For about the third or fourth time (only counts as one vote though)-

HELL NO!

I can not conceive of a case where you can be sure of shill bidding (51% sure, 67% sure, 75% sure, 99% sure).

Use this auction as an example. I still see 0% shill bidding. You saw 75% or more. Although you had no real impact in the end, you could have cost the winner some money and you did impugn the reputation of the seller. Whatever you saw had zero impact on the winners top bid and, apparently, none on the underbidder.

There was nothing to "out."

Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-25-2007, 03:11 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: martindl


Matt - you asked "martin - what about forgeries that are only 75% certain?" - personally, I'm either sure or I'm not sure. I couldn't put a percentage on my not-suredness, so I'd vote Nay, unless you're sure.

Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 10-25-2007, 03:11 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Matt

Jim - do I have you tabulated correctly now?

Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 10-25-2007, 03:12 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: MVSNYC

Matt- i was being facetious, several of you guys are getting techincal (75%, 50/50, etc.)...i just was making it clear that it is near-impossible to quantify such subjective thoughts/opinions...


p.s. that was a "wink" not a smiley

Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 10-25-2007, 03:22 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Al Simeone

Matt,
I saw that it was a Winking Smiley!! But dont tell peter C about it he hasnt yet figured out how to post a winking smiley!!!!

Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 10-25-2007, 04:12 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Gilbert Maines

I want to change my vote to 2.

Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 10-25-2007, 04:13 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Jeff Lichtman

I vote C.

Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 10-25-2007, 04:15 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Matt

Tabulating:

A (3):
Marty
boxingcardman
martindl

B (8):
Steve Murray
Joe D.
MVSNYC
Rob
barrysloate
Jim VB
Al Simeone
Gilbert Maines

C (3):
Jon Canfield
Josh Adams
Jeff Lichtman

Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 10-25-2007, 04:18 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Tony Andrea

I vote "C".

Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 10-25-2007, 04:36 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: barrysloate

Matt- I kind of hover between B and C. I would out shilling if you are virtually certain; but I personally don't care about it as I would place my bid anyway.

But if you are only pretty certain and have no proof, then I am still a B.

Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 10-25-2007, 04:43 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: Dave Hornish

I vote C

Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 10-25-2007, 05:31 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Poll: Should Suspect Auctions be Outed?

Posted By: 1880nonsports

because the only way you are in the "C" category is if you're the one doing it. 99.9% certainty (and even 75%) of occurances of shill bidding seems unattainable as there are so many variables and so many unknowns. You can catch an idiot that exposes himself in a blatant manner - like 2 dealers that used the exact wording which included 2 of the same made-up words and same sold material. Other than that it's mere speculation and as mentioned before could be used in a self-serving manner relative to a card or seller. I think we lose as a group more than we gain by allowing the outing of suspected or imagined shilling. With 150,000,000+ registered on eBay ya doesn't have to go to a neighbor or a dummy account - like any auction anyone can ask someone else to place a bid.

Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Legendary Auctions Acquires Assets of Mastro Auctions Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 0 03-10-2009 08:33 PM
New Poll Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 54 12-21-2006 07:03 PM
I suspect Dizzy Dean is... Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 9 10-12-2006 02:53 PM
Way too much.....suspect? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 4 10-12-2005 11:44 PM
Ummm... think this Mantle is suspect? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 02-10-2005 04:39 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 AM.


ebay GSB