 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-17-2019, 01:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Would you feel different about 1953 Bowman B&W if....
..they had numbered it as an extension of the color set?
It really gets little to no love compared to one of the greatest sets of all time. But it was really a high number series, which usually gets a lot of attention. The B&W are harder to find, just like high numbers, but not treated like high numbers. If the numbering were different what would that do to the value and demand? 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1953 Topps #89 Stobbs, 1953 bowman color #47 Garver 1953 Archives signed #318 Simmons | Republicaninmass | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 8 | 05-16-2016 03:21 PM |
| FS: 1953 Bowman Color Lot of 23 REDUCED 1950 Bowman Lot Added | boneheadandrube | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-11-2016 06:21 PM |
| 1953 Topps Bob Feller PSA DNA & 1953 Bowman Roberts SGC AUTO | brian29575 | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 0 | 02-22-2015 04:47 PM |
| FSH - 1953 Bowman Color & 1954 Bowman graded lots | tribefan | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-08-2014 08:55 PM |
| FS 1955 Bowman 1953 Bowman Color Ralph Kiner $30 | jjcollects | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-09-2013 08:28 PM |
Threaded Mode