NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-16-2018, 02:15 PM
BosseFieldBoy's Avatar
BosseFieldBoy BosseFieldBoy is offline
Mike Henry
Mi.ke Hen.ry
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 175
Default Reprints vs. Counterfeits - Is there a difference?

I apologize if I missed a prior thread on this issue, but I'm wondering, is there a difference between a reprint and a counterfeit?

I recently purchased a 1980-81 Topps Larry Bird/ Magic Johnson / Dr. J card. The listing revealed in the fine print that it was a "reprint" and I missed it. I, however, have always distinguished between a reprint and a counterfeit. In my mind, a reprint is an authorized reprinting or reproduction of an original card. In other words, Topps issues a card and either Topps or an authorized company later decides to reissue the card. I would think a reprint would have some kind of mark identifying itself as a reprint or, at the very least, a printing date that is different from that on the original card. Something distinguishing it from the original issue.

In my example, I would expect a reprint of the Topps card to somewhere say "reprint" or have a date somewhere on the card that is later than 1980. That is not the case with this card which leads me to believe it's a counterfeit, not a reprint.

What are your thoughts? Is it a distinction without a difference?
__________________
EBay ID mjhenr02; eBay store name Swinging Bunt’s Vintage Baseball

Always buying and selling everything prewar, ESPECIALLY TY COBB, and also 1950s cards.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-16-2018, 03:44 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,264
Default

In theory a clear difference, as one is intended to deceive and one is not.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-16-2018, 04:27 PM
GasHouseGang's Avatar
GasHouseGang GasHouseGang is offline
David M.
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: S. California
Posts: 2,854
Default

Is there a difference between a reprint and a counterfeit?

Clearly. Because ebay doesn't allow the sale of counterfeits. Or do they?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-16-2018, 04:35 PM
clydepepper's Avatar
clydepepper clydepepper is offline
Raymond 'Robbie' Culpepper
Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 6,928
Default

I recently picked up a few reprints that turned out to be so good...when comparing them to the original card that I also had, I decided to write 'RP' on each card back...just in case I forget when I get even older.

Of course the question is, why, if you already have the original cards, would you purchase reprints?


Because I'm addicted...what? You didn't really think I had a good reason, did you?
__________________
.
"A life is not important except in the impact it has on others lives" - Jackie Robinson

“If you have a chance to make life better for others and fail to do so, you are wasting your time on this earth.”- Roberto Clemente
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-16-2018, 07:44 PM
Jenx34 Jenx34 is offline
Ch.ris Jenk.ins
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 383
Default

IMO your assessment is dead on. It gets confused because people seem to use the terms interchangeably. But if it is not obviously marked a reprint, then it is simply that, a counterfeit.

I'm not sure that will help you with Ebay however, but if need be, that is the argument I would make.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-16-2018, 08:23 PM
Jewish-collector's Avatar
Jewish-collector Jewish-collector is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,665
Default

I actually collect legit, authorized reprints, because I can't afford the authentic cards. Sometimes you just gotta say WTF
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-17-2018, 05:53 AM
bnorth's Avatar
bnorth bnorth is online now
Ben North
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 9,788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jewish-collector View Post
I actually collect legit, authorized reprints, because I can't afford the authentic cards. Sometimes you just gotta say WTF
+1 I have several complete reprint sets.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-17-2018, 06:20 AM
tschock tschock is offline
T@yl0r $ch0ck
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 1,391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bnorth View Post
+1 I have several complete reprint sets.
Same here. This is a happy medium between collecting the 'complete set' as discussed in another thread and collecting specific players/cards. The reprint sets give me a cheap representation of the set, yet I can still enjoy just picking up certain original cards from that issue. Thus avoiding the 'obligation' some of us crazy complete set obsessives feel towards actually completing the set.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-17-2018, 06:30 AM
Aquarian Sports Cards Aquarian Sports Cards is offline
Scott Russell
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clydepepper View Post
I recently picked up a few reprints that turned out to be so good...when comparing them to the original card that I also had, I decided to write 'RP' on each card back...just in case I forget when I get even older.

Of course the question is, why, if you already have the original cards, would you purchase reprints?


Because I'm addicted...what? You didn't really think I had a good reason, did you?
Sounds like you bought counterfeits, not reprints.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible!

and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-17-2018, 04:54 PM
ruth_rookie's Avatar
ruth_rookie ruth_rookie is offline
“the bambino”
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 202
Default

I had no idea there was such demand for reprints. I see them offered all the time on eBay and have always wondered who bought them. Now I know, which seems to me would indicate strength in the overall vintage market in the sense that if originals decline to a certain point, people who have otherwise been buying reprints will step in buy, thus creating a bottom in the market (sorry for the run-on sentence). ��

Thoughts?

Last edited by ruth_rookie; 08-17-2018 at 04:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-17-2018, 08:29 PM
drcy's Avatar
drcy drcy is offline
David Ru.dd Cycl.eback
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3,466
Default

Two definitions of reprints/counterfeits. One is if there is deception (counterfeit). The other is is the maker has legal authority/right to reprint the card. Whether or not there is deception at sale, any unauthorized reproductions of Levi's jeans or Coach bags are called counterfeits. The same could be reasonably said about unauthorized reprints of Topps, Fleer, etc cards. If the seller has no right to reprint them, then they have no right to sell them. I think it's fair to call the counterfeits.

100% yes, ethical reprints have to be significantly physically different than the original. And I say merely putting 'reprint' in small print on the card is not enough.

Now, old cards, such as T206 and Old Judges, are well beyond the copyright window. However, there's the catch of the celebrity, team and brand trademark issues.

I've often said that if one wanted to fix the eBay counterfeit issue, one should pursue the trademark/copyright angle. Whether or not the auction description was deceptive or not would be immaterial. Remove all unauthorized reprints would nip it in the bud, just as Coach etc has all unauthorized reproductions of their products removed.

I would say that, even though it says reprint in the description, if you say you deserve your money back because the person is selling unauthorized reprints (which some might label as counterfeits), I would say that's a fair argument.

Last edited by drcy; 08-17-2018 at 08:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-18-2018, 09:45 AM
JustinD's Avatar
JustinD JustinD is offline
Ju$tin D@v3n.por+
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Birmingham, Mi
Posts: 2,611
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drcy View Post
I've often said that if one wanted to fix the eBay counterfeit issue, one should pursue the trademark/copyright angle. Whether or not the auction description was deceptive or not would be immaterial. Remove all unauthorized reprints would nip it in the bud, just as Coach etc has all unauthorized reproductions of their products removed.
I hate to victim blame on this, but much of the counterfeiting falls on the current trademark holders (Topps, Panini, NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, etc) for their lack of prosecution or civil damage claims against those doing this. EBay goes after those fakes basically only for those that hold them liable as well as providing those companies with contact info to the sellers for legal and civil consequence.

As long as they continue to ignore this, eBay will as well. There are zero consequences other than "possible" removal of a listing.
__________________
- Justin D.


Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander.

Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-18-2018, 12:19 PM
Throttlesteer Throttlesteer is offline
Anson
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ruth_rookie View Post
I had no idea there was such demand for reprints. I see them offered all the time on eBay and have always wondered who bought them. Now I know, which seems to me would indicate strength in the overall vintage market in the sense that if originals decline to a certain point, people who have otherwise been buying reprints will step in buy, thus creating a bottom in the market (sorry for the run-on sentence). ��


Thoughts?
That, or the strength in the overall economy increases demand, affording the reprint owners the chance at the real mccoy.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-18-2018, 05:52 PM
CobbSpikedMe's Avatar
CobbSpikedMe CobbSpikedMe is offline
Andrew Hunt00n
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Belle Mead, NJ
Posts: 2,169
Default

I've purchased cheap fake cards (that I guess would be considered counterfeits) on purpose knowing they were fake so I could educate myself on what they look and feel like. These weren't prewar, but were vintage cards. If I showed a few scans of these fakes with some real cards they would be difficult to tell apart. But when I got them in hand I could tell right away they were fake. And now I know what to look for when looking at cards in person. I consider it an inexpensive education to be honest. I wasn't getting scammed by anyone and now I know what to look for.
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar.

The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here
My Online Trading Site: Click Here
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com
My Humble Blog: Click Here
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-22-2018, 03:36 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
In theory a clear difference, as one is intended to deceive and one is not.
Yes, in theory.
__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-24-2018, 08:29 PM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,087
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinD View Post
I hate to victim blame on this, but much of the counterfeiting falls on the current trademark holders (Topps, Panini, NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, etc) for their lack of prosecution or civil damage claims against those doing this. EBay goes after those fakes basically only for those that hold them liable as well as providing those companies with contact info to the sellers for legal and civil consequence.

As long as they continue to ignore this, eBay will as well. There are zero consequences other than "possible" removal of a listing.

Unless the country makes some drastic changes, it will always be this way. For a rights holder, it's a balance of a number of factors. Chasing everyone that made a fake card would be expensive.

For sake of argument, lets say someone makes 15 reprints of popular Topps cards and sell them as reprints. Have I violated copyright? Yes. If I sold them for a total of even $300, how much have they damaged Topps, who don't sell their older cards, and claims right on the current packaging that they don't guarantee the cards will have any future value? Maybe the 300? Maybe more, maybe some unknown amount because it hurts their reputation. If the person doing that doesn't have much money, Topps is stuck with the cost of suing them, and having to do other stuff to eventually get the money. Probably way more than $300.


What could they lose? What did Disney lose back when they went after even people who made their own mouse T shirts and dared wear them to the park. A bit of public respect, which eventually costs them sales.


Protecting IP is important, but protecting it reasonably and cost effectively is also important.


In other fields it's getting more complex, early video games are avidly collected, and a lot of people make playable versions available online. It's sort of grassroots archiving, but it's also a copyright violation. One of the big sites just had most of the games taken down. The end result is that a lot of historic stuff is endangered, as it was issued on corruptible media. It doesn't have enough commercial value for a company to save it and periodically offer a version, but they want to protect it from piracy. Some also aren't at all willing to license the IP at all.

So there's areas where the laws need to get more restrictive, and areas where being less restrictive would be good.

Even then, simply reducing the copyright time on software wouldn't be fair, as that would put stuff like most of Microsoft Office in the same category with whatever's on an Atari 2600 cartridge from a company that folded in the mid 80's.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-24-2018, 08:45 PM
Aquarian Sports Cards Aquarian Sports Cards is offline
Scott Russell
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,297
Default

I understand what you're saying, but the easiest thing to do is to ensure that ebay polices your IP. Have you ever tried to buy fake Tiffany jewellery or Coach Handbags on ebay? You can't. Because those companies have made it clear to ebay that there will be consequences to being a marketplace of counterfeits.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible!

and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-24-2018, 11:34 PM
SetBuilder SetBuilder is offline
Manny
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Key Biscayne, FL
Posts: 611
Default

One interesting case I'd like to share (not sure how it applies to baseball cards in particular, but I found it interesting nonetheless), is the Esterbrook fountain pen company.

They ceased operations in 1971, but someone recently was able to revive the company by filing for the Esterbook trademark, which had been abandoned. Trademarks like Esterbook are called "graveyard trademarks".

Now, if one collects fountain pens, you would have to differentiate between the original, old Esterbook company, and the modern reincarnation, that has nothing to do with the original company. They are technically the "same" entity because they share the exact name, but in practice (and probably philosophically), they are not the same Esterbook.

It's interesting, because several trading card companies in recent memory have ceased operations and their trademarks are counting down to expiration.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-25-2018, 03:48 AM
JustinD's Avatar
JustinD JustinD is offline
Ju$tin D@v3n.por+
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Birmingham, Mi
Posts: 2,611
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SetBuilder View Post
It's interesting, because several trading card companies in recent memory have ceased operations and their trademarks are counting down to expiration.
Those rights are stone solid.

Topps has bought the Bowman name and then used many vintage ideas which I would assume have been either bought or trademarked again such as t206 and turkey red. Panini has done the same with Donruss and Playoff who owned the Pacific brand. Upper Deck has owned Fleer for quite a while.
__________________
- Justin D.


Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander.

Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-25-2018, 04:14 AM
JustinD's Avatar
JustinD JustinD is offline
Ju$tin D@v3n.por+
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Birmingham, Mi
Posts: 2,611
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve B View Post
For sake of argument, lets say someone makes 15 reprints of popular Topps cards and sell them as reprints. Have I violated copyright? Yes. If I sold them for a total of even $300, how much have they damaged Topps, who don't sell their older cards, and claims right on the current packaging that they don't guarantee the cards will have any future value? Maybe the 300? Maybe more, maybe some unknown amount because it hurts their reputation. If the person doing that doesn't have much money, Topps is stuck with the cost of suing them, and having to do other stuff to eventually get the money. Probably way more than 300..
A case can be made that the damages are exponentially higher than the sales figures for the counterfeits due to reputation damage. The basic premise the card companies want to be an underlying point is that the cards are an investment. Selling 20k wax boxes new from the factory requires them to maintain that it is a limited run and a status item.

Manufacturers such as Coach understand that losing the cache of their brand by having swap meet examples sold on the net undermines the buyer confidence and may have the items seized causing the counterfeiter frustration but also will pursue the selling platform (i.e.: eBay) for knowingly aiding sale of a forgery. That is where they find success and your lawyer money is well spent. Even if you lose, you win as eBay will avoid it in the future as it's just not worth more lawsuits.

This is being overlooked now simply because these counterfeits are detectable but we are likely only a few years away from that not being the case. With the dollars that are out there for high grade vintage it is not even a minor stretch of the imagination to see a well financed crime organization creating undetectable cards and cases and flooding the market with them. The moment that delicate trust from consumers is shattered we will be sitting on worthless collections. Don't doubt that someone is not already working hard on this when there is millions to be made.
__________________
- Justin D.


Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander.

Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-25-2018, 03:00 PM
SetBuilder SetBuilder is offline
Manny
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Key Biscayne, FL
Posts: 611
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinD View Post
Those rights are stone solid.

Topps has bought the Bowman name and then used many vintage ideas which I would assume have been either bought or trademarked again such as t206 and turkey red. Panini has done the same with Donruss and Playoff who owned the Pacific brand. Upper Deck has owned Fleer for quite a while.
Almost all the big names are taken, but there are still some fringe names out there from the 1980's and 90's. I think Leaf was revived recently (was previously a graveyard trademark).

T206 refers to the set name that was used in the American Card Catalog. The original company never referred to the cards that way. I don't think the cards ever had an actual name, other than the tobacco brands on the backs.

I suppose if you wanted to be historically precise, you would revive The American Tobacco Company or The American Lithographic Company. Both trademarks are dead.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-25-2018, 04:23 PM
Dewey's Avatar
Dewey Dewey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 744
Default

I buy reprints to go with photos used for cards. I wouldn't buy a counterfeit, even if cheaper, because intent matters. Happily reprints are cheap.
__________________
42 Collection: Jackie Robinson, Branch Rickey and the People Who Shaped the Story https://www.flickr.com/photos/158992...57668696860149
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-25-2018, 04:28 PM
JustinD's Avatar
JustinD JustinD is offline
Ju$tin D@v3n.por+
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Birmingham, Mi
Posts: 2,611
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SetBuilder View Post
Almost all the big names are taken, but there are still some fringe names out there from the 1980's and 90's. I think Leaf was revived recently (was previously a graveyard trademark).

T206 refers to the set name that was used in the American Card Catalog. The original company never referred to the cards that way. I don't think the cards ever had an actual name, other than the tobacco brands on the backs.

I suppose if you wanted to be historically precise, you would revive The American Tobacco Company or The American Lithographic Company. Both trademarks are dead.
Brian Grey only acquired rights for the name Leaf, all images and design from the 80s-90s incarnation would be part of the acquisition of the donruss, pinnacle, and playoff properties by Panini. Gray's ability to use even passing reference to earlier properties has already been challenged in court. In 2013 he was sued for the Valiant inserts as they were too close to the prior Crusade inserts. The lawsuit was dropped after a settlement in which he dropped a claim to the rights for "Leaf Limited" as it was a little too close to the Panini Limited name for their liking.

As to t206, I understand the history quite clearly but as Topps issued several sets and inserts using the t206 name as the title during the last 10-12 years I am assuming they at least tried to lock it down to avoid competition.
__________________
- Justin D.


Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander.

Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Warning About Counterfeits RUSH2112 Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 2 12-26-2013 01:54 PM
52 Wheaties counterfeits Archive Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 2 09-22-2007 08:50 AM
Fan For A Fan Counterfeits? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 11 08-15-2007 12:01 PM
Non-Wagner, T2** Counterfeits posts. Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 3 02-10-2006 11:56 AM
New Breed Of T206 Counterfeits Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 5 09-04-2005 10:09 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:13 AM.


ebay GSB