|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Fantastic cards everybody. Glad to see mid-grade cards get some love.
Here are a few more. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the comments on the Banks. I was starting to build the 54 set but I had the Banks, Kaline, Aaron left and that was overwhelming. With the recent purchases I am only left with Aaron as a big card - I've got Mays, Jackie, both Williams etc. So I am in good shape. Need to acquire some of the common players I have left. Maybe 50 or so. Those should be pretty easy and then I'll wait for a big holiday or birthday to get the Aaron. That card is simply out of my normal card budget.
Awesome 53 Mantle. I am assuming some sort of paper loss on the back? I display all my Mantles in a case so that type of Mantle would work perfect for me. What a nicely centered Mantle! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Dean...that's a terrific lineup of cards!
__________________
People are crazy and times are strange, I used to care but things have changed -Dylan |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for the kind words guys.
Stephen - yes, there is paperloss in the back. But not enough to bother me with the kind of eye appeal the front offers. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
While 5 is the midpoint, I've always thought of midgrade as vg through ex-mt. Or 3-6. Sub-3 is low grade, off-grade, OBC, or collector grade. Whatever term you like. 7-8 is high grade, 9-10 is registry bait. That would all be for pre-1974 cards. Once you get into the 1974-on, I'd say there is basically no collectability below a nice looking 4 unless it is one of the really expensive RCs from the era. The rest is basically dollar box fodder. After 1980, the cut-off is basically a 6 or a 7, except for a few cards (1986 Jordan, 1979 Gretzky) that people will buy. Modern era (1989+) there is no midgrade or low grade; if it ain't near mint or better it is basically useless.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
"Registry bait", good term. There was an old grading site used 10-15 years or so ago where a collector named Bruce Moreland was attempting to describe how certain terms were useless outside of the world of professional grading, and particularly with vintage cards. His point was that trying to describe the difference between a mint card and a gem mint card while raw was likely to be so purely subjective as to be absurd. Your term comes in nicely here, because those types of cards are most certainly "registry bait."
In case you couldn't guess no, I do not participate in any PSA registry quests...
__________________
Vintage Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
"OBC" for low grade...Awesome.
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble Blog: Click Here |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Used to chase nm-mt stuff, graded, but that is not me.
The cards I owned as a kid were early’60’s and I handled the **ll out of them. We all did. So a perfect card is nothing I owned for long.
I chase VGExish stuff these days and have been selling off the high grade prewar stuff I have. There is something about a rougher card that I find attractive. Maybe it’s the idea of owning something that some other kid kinda like me liked having. Recently I started a Japanese Menko type set, starting with die cut and round menko from the late ‘40s and early fifties. Thinking about kids who lived through the horror of WW2 brought it all home to me. I prefer cards that were played with and wonder where on the island they came from. Maybe one day I will get overseas, maybe not. Baseball is cool.
__________________
T206 154/518 second time around R312 49/50 1962 Topps 598/598 super set 694/697 ...whatever I want Last edited by drmondobueno; 06-05-2018 at 12:51 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Gorgeous Mantle. If that is poor, I'll take poor cards all day long.
__________________
Vintage Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Buying collectors grade (F-G) of these 4 1959 Topps | Ed_Hutchinson | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-06-2017 02:50 PM |
FS: Several Collectors Grade 1950s Mantles | j_bodensteiner | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-09-2016 01:55 PM |
Plank, Collins and Evers - Collectors Grade *reduced | Tao_Moko | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-08-2015 09:01 PM |
1971 T goldmine for off-grade collectors ~ 60% of the set! | JElwell | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 03-07-2014 08:43 AM |
Collectors Forensic Register = Grade Tech Services Inc.? | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 11-13-2010 10:10 AM |