|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
The Future of Type I Photos
I don't know if this has come up before, but here goes.
We all know that a new, major buying trend in recent years has been in vintage Type I photos. I resisted (though have large collection of M101-2, as I am a photog myself) until the past week when I won a Ruth and a Mays. But here is what I am wondering. Of course, rarity/scarcity has been a big deal for a long time. But the top players always draw much value even when dozens, hundreds, even thousands of a particular card or issue exist. Yet, in many cases, Type I photos can be one of a kind or at least very few of a kind, with little chance that more will surface. PSA authenticates and presents them nicely in jumbo holders and the images are usually great--and in large size, and god bless them, usually without "centering" issues. Sometimes they were taken by the most famous baseball photogs. Anyway: As much as many of these have surged in value, shouldn't they actually go much higher in the future--due to the scarcity thing? Or even comparing similar images and size: Just for example, why should a Ruth Butterfinger or Ruth Quaker Oats, of which there are at least dozens, be worth more than a nice, similar, but nothing special Type I Ruth which might be one or three of a kind? Or pick your own examples of photo vs. card. Why should a Gehrig Goudey, almost too numerous to count, be worth more than a Type I Gehrig with a unique or nearly unique large image? Well, you get the idea. Last edited by GregMitch34; Today at 07:55 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I agree that certain Type 1 photos are just breathtaking and with a scarcity as you mentioned (one or few of a kind), only have room to run. Make it a coveted player, playing days, maybe even a little provenance or something unique about the photo and well you get this...
__________________
Cheers, Brian Ty Cobb & T200 afictionado ANWCOLLECTIBLES on Instagram "If it's not at least a hundred years old, I probably won't want it." "Yesterday's price, is not today's price." The goods --> https://www.flickr.com/photos/196575621@N05/albums Last edited by anchorednw; Today at 08:04 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
There are hundreds to probably thousands of photos out there of the big name guys of each era like WaJo, Ruth, Mays, Jackie, etc. The ones that will truly surge in value are going to have to have story, come from a historic event, be a card image, and/or just breathtaking imagery.
The reason they aren't now is because of demand. He supply of Ruth imagery seems never ending as well. Last edited by Swadewade51; Today at 08:41 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Difference between Type 1 and Type 2 Press Photos... | jgmp123 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 38 | 05-05-2024 05:40 PM |
Photos Question - Type 1, Type 2, Type 3, etc. | jjbond | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 26 | 02-16-2023 08:22 PM |
Future of signed photos in the hobby? | homerunhitter | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 24 | 06-17-2020 05:56 PM |
Price Reduction Photos Added Type I Photos for Sale | 71buc | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 8 | 03-28-2019 12:55 PM |
Type 1 photos - 1922 World Series program - photos used for cards | horzverti | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 4 | 10-17-2016 03:58 PM |