|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: PASJD
Has anyone done a comparison of the number of cards each of the big three grade a month? |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Mike P.
Keep in mind that when this was listed on ebay and PSA was notified they immediately deleted the serial number so it's no longer in their database(at least not the public online one), I wish I took a screen shot of that. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Bottom of the Ninth
They did the same to my partner who bought a T206 Red Cobb PSA 7 in which the flip indicated it was the Ty Cobb back. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Josh K.
JIM C - just curious if the cards that were resubmitted, were sent by the dealer back to psa (indicating that he may also get some sort of preferential treatment as has been surmised). |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Rick
business seems good at CU, if you add their other divisions (PCGS ,PSA/DNA etc)the numbers look even better. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: JimCrandell
MikeP, |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: WP
Jim, |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: JimCrandell
WP, |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Tom Papa
"Jim, |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: JimCrandell
Tom, |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Tom Papa
edited ....by me |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: JimCrandell
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: JimCrandell
Tom, |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: WP
Jim, |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: JimCrandell
WP, |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: WP
What amount wouldn't grade 8 is what you should be concerned about. Surely they wouldnt just blindly cross your entire collection without examining the material. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Jim has some incredible sets in the registry (I know as I am behind him on just a very few of his), so I would second: a) his general happiness; and b) the reasons why he's sticking with PSA. I have a fraction of the graded sets that he has and once you're in the registry deep you're in the registry probably forever. While I would probably rather have my sets all in SGC (mostly due to the looks of the holder), the pain associated with crossing them over makes such a prospect impossible. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: PASJD
I remember PSA a few years back would set up at a Tuesday night show in Parsippany NJ essentially because Solomon Cramer promised them a huge supply of cards to grade if they did, but setting up in someone's HOUSE is taking it to the next level for sure. On the one hand, I guess you can't beat that for customer service. On the other hand, something about it seems a little inappropriate. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: will watson
in my initial post, i tried to make it clear i didn't see PSA as perfect. far from it. i know they make (often stupid) mistakes, and frankly, the way the deal with those mistakes often makes them look like idiots. as far as the registry goes, it's a genius marketing tool. has it helped PSA immensely? of course. does it make people pay insane prices for "low pop" cards? yep. that isn't PSA's fault. blame the collectors who pay these prices. remember- cards are worth whatever someone will pay for them. if a '54 Ben Wade PSA 8 regularly sells for over $2k, then that leads me to believe thats a true indicator of its real world value- regardless of the huge discrepancy from its raw price guide "book value." |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: will watson
Jim, |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Scott Ingold
I agree with goodriddance...... How can M. Baker show up at your house for gradding purposes ? I have been using GAI for the part year or so do to the BS with PSA. But if this is true I might have to rethink this also. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: JimCrandell
WP, |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Todd Schultz
to the rest of us, or at least me, as to what to look for in getting all high-end 8s. After all, if you have over 20K graded PSA 8s and less than .1% would fall below GAI 8 (the equivalent of about 20 or so cards), you have by far a keener eye than anyone with whom I've shared collecting experiences. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: PASJD
Only buy 8s that look like 9s to the naked eye -- perfect centering, razor sharp corners, no apparent defects -- and you should be OK. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Scott Forrest
In response to the following, considering how large your collection is and how many t206's you own, I'd be surprised if you weren't a much better judge of tampering than the guys at PSA. The "independent judge" that you seek (the god-like cheetoh munchers) does nothing but add re-sell value to your cards. You are buying a plastic value add-on, nothing more. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: JimCrandell
Todd, |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Todd Schultz
the cards are either nm/mt or they are not, whether graded by PSA, SGC, GAI or the members of this board. If the gripe is that PSA is inconsistent (a point with which I agree, BTW), then it seems to me that 20,000 graded 8s should show a lot of divergence if submitted to another company or to the collecting community at large. Yet by your remarks, only 2.1% would score outside the nm/mt grade at GAI. That to me suggests that you'd get basically the same result at GAI. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Howie
How does one glance at 20,000 cards and estimate that 40%-45% would receive 1/2 point or more upgrades if crossed over to a new service? If another service bid 50%-60% would it make them better? That shows an extreme amount of confidence in the quality and consistency they expect to find in their competitor's product. It also shows that a .5 increase in grade may not be all it's cracked out to be. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: JimCrandell
Well, they did grade most of my cards while they were at PSA. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: PASJD
Jim, on the one hand, in a prior post, you appear to say PSA is the least reliable of the three grading services, very inaccurate, etc. etc. Yet by your own estimate GAI would agree that 97.9 percent of your PSA 8's are accurately graded -- 2 percent would grade higher and .1 percent or less would grade lower. That is an astonishing degree of accuracy for PSA, no? What am I missing here? Thanks in advance, PETER |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Scott Forrest
I would add that contrary to the opinions of some PSA supporters, few people on this board would like to see PSA actually disappear - we would prefer that they respond to our feedback by offering a better overall product. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: JimCrandell
Scott, |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: will watson
Runscott, |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Chuck R
This whole thread makes me think back to those halcyon days of The Trader Speaks and Bill Mastro showing up at a convention with a Wagner in a grocery bag. 20,000 PSA cards? Wow...that's more money in grading than my collection is worth. With eBay and all the scammers, I guess we can't put the genie back in the bottle, but things sure have changed. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: WP
Jim, |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: PASJD
Jim but you don't know how many of your PSA 8's PSA itself would grade an 8.5 if they had half grades. The fact that GAI might "bump" 40 percent of them says nothing bad about PSA because PSA chooses to grade cards on a whole point system, so in that sense, an 8.5 from GAI is not a "bump" rather it is a different grade based on a different system. So my point stands: your own estimates of how GAI would grade your collection support the proposition that PSA's grading is consistent. GAI would agree that, under PSA's system, almost 98 percent of your cards are graded accurately. I also do not see 8.5s bringing in major premiums for the typical star cards, but my experience concededly is not as broad as others who may be in a better position to comment. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Scott Forrest
...you are selling to people who buy the slab rather than the card. A PSA-8 that is actually over half-way to being a PSA-9, would be a GAI-8.5, and if you assume GAI and PSA slabs have equal retail value (which they don't), then the GAI-8.5 is "worth" more. |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: PASJD
Buying the slab includes buying the name of the grading company on the slab. My impression is that a GAI 8.5 of a typical star card will sell for less than, or certainly not more than, a strong PSA 8 of the same card. |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Jim, I'm in the 55 and 58 sets near the top. |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: John
Has this hobby really come down to mythical half grades now, good god. What a Pandora’s box we have opened with the advent of these grading companies. Half a point better how absurd. |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Julie Vognar
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: JimCrandell
My understanding was when Marshall converted his 57 Topps psa set to gai there were no downgrades. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Peter, I would tend to agree that with modern cards (Topps 50s and up), a GAI 8.5 may just be equal to a PSA 8 --thus making it prohibitive to consider a crossover. And you're right--a PSA 8 may very well have been a PSA 8.5 if such a grade existed. So, thousands of PSA 8s are not likely (at least in theory) to cross many over as GAI 9s -- unless GAI wanted the business badly enough. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: anonymousdave
.... |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Josh K.
what, how can you possibly not see Ward's hands on his hips? |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: David Vargha
His hands were on the ample hips on one FiFi LaFleur. She moved just off camera as the shot was snapped. There wasn't enough room on the flip for the full description, so it was abbreviated as shown. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: barrysloate
Hey- I'm hip to John Ward. What I mentioned on a different post is that the job of card grading is a tedious and repetitive process, and I think if any of us had to do this eight hours a day, five days a week, we would sort of put ourselves on automatic pilot; hence, all these errors we see on the labels. Try grading your own cards for eight hours without your mind wandering a bit. It's not an excuse for the labels, merely recognizing that grading is in fact a monotonous and dull job. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Harry_Pairatesties
I think the problem is that PSA encapsulation room is diffrent from the label room? I doubt that they are intertwined so as the cards come down the labels are waiting for them? Maybe someone who has worked for a grading company that pumps out 15,000 cards a month can shed some light on this problem? After all if PSA only graded vintage cards they would have been out of business a few years ago. I guess the same can be said for Topps? If collectors only bought vintage they would have stopped making cards in 1953. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: barrysloate
Maybe its a sweatshop with graders locked into a windowless room who are not allowed breaks. Maybe not quite that bad, but repetitive and tedious for sure. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
PSA discussion
Posted By: Scott Forrest
should not occur if someone is double-checking the work. I wouldn't think it would be that difficult or time-consuming, and if reviews were being done I doubt we would see things like the t206 Heinie/Honus or this Ward example. What are the odds of these things getting past two people? |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scary PSA Fakes -- discussion on Post-war board | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 12-09-2008 12:35 PM |
REA BL 460 Discussion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 43 | 05-11-2008 08:47 AM |
T206 Printing Discussion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-21-2007 06:01 AM |
Discussion of Pick-Up Threads... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 11-20-2007 01:13 PM |
E121 Variation Discussion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-28-2007 07:54 PM |