NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 04-29-2008, 06:13 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: barrysloate

"Punk Kid"

You tell 'em Dan!

Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 04-29-2008, 06:39 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: Matt R

I really find this disturbing if the original poster is telling the truth (and my gut feeling is that he is telling the truth).

Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 04-29-2008, 06:44 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: howard

Chuck, whether or not PCG is a legit company there is little doubt to me that the Mantle card is terribly misgraded. It is off center, faded and has soft corners. There is no way it is NM+. If they can't properly grade such a high profile card I would not trust them.

Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 04-29-2008, 06:54 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: Matt R

Agreed Howard, it's definitely not near mint. My question would be whether or not it's authentic. Something is shouting counterfeit at me.

Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 04-29-2008, 07:10 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: leon

I tend to agree with you in hindsight. This anonymous post really shouldn't have been let go. The rule is there for a reason, as the other ones pertaining to anonymity, and they are tried and true and work. Once the genie is out of the bottle it's hard to put him back in. I was trying to think of a reason when even a dealer would want to remain anonymous. I guess it could be that there are repercussions for doing so ie... harsher grades if more cards were sent in. Since "Freddie" mentioned both PSA and SGC I didn't really think it was a favoritism thing. In hindsight it shouldn't have been let go though.....I agree too...if you don't like a grading company, or grading in general, then don't do it...regards

Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 04-29-2008, 07:11 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: Eric Brehm

I agree with Joe D. and others who see third party grading, on balance, as a benefit to the hobby. I re-entered the hobby in 2006, after a 20 year hiatus, and when I saw that cards were now being graded and encapsulated by professional specialists, I immediately accepted it as a good method to significantly reduce the uncertainty associated with buying and selling, such as we dealt with in the old days, when verbal condition descriptions were all over the map. If consistency of communication about condition is the goal, it certainly seems better to me than it used to be, albeit imperfect.

I also see the horror stories about particular graded cards, and understand the concerns about huge differences in market value associated with inherently subjective evaluations of card condition. For my part, I collect 1933 Goudeys in high grade, mostly PSA 8, but have never purchased a PSA 9, because I don't think the difference in price vs. quality is cost effective in that case. On the other hand, I do buy PSA 9's in post-war issues, because they are relatively plentiful and generally are 'the best of the best'. But I look at them very carefully. I would prefer to have a PSA 7 or 8 with better eye appeal, than a card that happens to meet the technical requirements for PSA 9 (or maybe just got lucky in the grading house one day), not to mention saving a large amount of money in the bargain.

Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 04-29-2008, 07:43 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: Steve

I wonder why "Freddie" did not mention GAI?


Steve

Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 04-30-2008, 06:08 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: Joseph Shirley

I can't help but think about how all these crack outs overinflate the pop reports at PSA. There are now 2 PSA 5's that don't exist.

Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 04-30-2008, 09:28 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: Steve

I can't help but think how anyone here believed this crap. lol

Steve

Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 05-01-2008, 05:44 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: Paul S

Well, Elton John told me that Roger Daltry confirmed Freddy Mercury's story.

Reply With Quote
  #61  
Old 05-01-2008, 05:59 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: Jeff Lichtman

Freddy announced he wished to remain anonymous "for good reason." Does PSA send out hit teams to silence its critics?

Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 05-01-2008, 07:05 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: Bilko G


I wonder why "Freddie" did not mention GAI?


Steve


Steve, are you implying something? LOL!


Bilko

Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 05-01-2008, 08:32 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: JK

"I was trying to think of a reason when even a dealer would want to remain anonymous."

Perhaps he doesnt want anyone to mention that this card was deemed trimmed when he later sells it as a psa 5 and fails to disclose the card's history.

Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 05-01-2008, 12:41 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: Brad L.

Geez, I would have at least stopped at the 2nd five to recoup some of my grading fees. Why would you send the 5 back a second time knowing that it could drop in grade again??? No offense, but that seems really stupid from here.

*edited to add: And that sure doesn't seem like the actions of a dealer, lol.

*edited to add:

I wonder why "Freddie" did not mention GAI?


Steve


Steve, are you implying something? LOL!


Bilko


I'll be the first to shout "Bingo!!"

Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 05-01-2008, 04:12 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: Brian

What is a hit team?

Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 05-01-2008, 04:50 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: Tim Kinserlow

Steve has a point. If a person really thinks about it, GAI might not have been mentioned for a good reason.

There is a person on this forum making new id's on other forums as well. He likes playing the "3rd party", to see how far he can take it. Steve knows exactly what I mean. We caught the guy on another forum trying to come back under a new identity, too. He's not as smart as he thinks he is.

Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 05-01-2008, 06:48 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default PSA Inconsistency and others

Posted By: Matt R

If you are referring to me, then you are mistaken.

Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1953 Howell RC PSA 7 1961 DeJordy RC PSA 7 1965 Cheevers RC PSA 7.5 For Sale Archive Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T 0 01-15-2009 10:30 AM
FS-T207's Mullin No D PSA 6 (highest graded),McDonald PSA 6 (1 higher), Henry PSA 3 Archive Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T 2 12-03-2007 05:30 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:45 AM.


ebay GSB