|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Personally, I think qualifiers are stupid. I don't there is anything dumber than grading a card PSA 8 (oc) in my opinion. If the card is OC, how can you say it's an 8! Just another gimmick!
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
It seems to me that one finds the widest range of condition variation at the lower range. Grades of 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5 seem the most useful to me.
JimB |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I hate to disagree
I strongly disagree with this opinion. I prefer to have greater transparency in understanding why a certain grade was assigned. Especially in the imperfect eBay marketplace. I rely to a certain extent on a third party opinion when considering a purchase. If i find a listing for a card with a grade of psa 4mk I can make a buying decision based on the knowledge that the card has a mark on it. I do not have that assurity with an sgc 50. I have bought several cards in sgc 50 holders with marks on them that have no chance to cross to an psa 6 mk. The assertion that sgc takes this into account and drops the grade accordingly is simply not true in many cases. In extreme cases, yes but not always. I prefer the extra information the psa qualifier provides. In a perfect world where I had the card in hand pre-purchase it might not matter but I buy less than 1% of my cards face to face.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
In my opinion, a severely OC card shouldn't be an 8! A card with a mark on it shouldn't be a 4! Slight paper loss can make cards that appear 4s and 5s be 1s and 2s! Can someone please tell me how a card that's been miscut or have a mark on it or it severely OC be a PSA 7 or PSA 8?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Psa agrees with you
A psa 8 oc is not the same as a psa 8. Nobody considers them the same. The card is an 8 but it is oc. Hence the psa 8 oc. This is clear to everybody and is clearly stated on the flip. You can request psa grade w/o qualifiers if it bothers you that much. What bothers me is when a card with a mark gets an sgc 50. It is not but that is what they assign it.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Technical grade is separate from qualification. Corners, edges & surface make the card an 8. 60/40 or better centering make it an unqualified 8. Worse than 60/40 gets the oc designation. 100/0 gets the mc for miscut designation. Their system grades the physical characteristics of the card then the characteristics of the image. I hear plenty of complaints of oj cards with practically invisible images getting high technical grades from sgc and not properly taking image into account.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Many buyers would tend to agree bc an 8oc usually sells at a 5or 6 price. therefore, I didn't understand the need to put an 8 in the slab. what is the point if you are going to get a price that is 2-3 full grades below. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
RC qualifier
Quote:
All kidding aside, I think the point of view of many SGC collectors is that any flaw brings down the technical grade... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I agree
I just sgc would tell me what the flaw is rather than me having me try to guess what the grader was seeing. Sgc also does not downgrade for miscut t206s. How many miscut American beauty backed cards do you see that do not downgrade for the miscut?
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
being OC is not the same as a wrinkle or a soft corner. most likely it was a defect from the factory and the cutting was wonky. i can absolutely see how a near mint/mint can be cut OC...and thus graded an 8oc.
if you want to pick on qualifiers, go with marking or staining or even print defect...OC is legit and confirmed OG. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Very Well Said!
__________________
Life's Grand, Denny Walsh |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
half points
How long before sellers on Ebay start including this in their description: "SGC 30, should be a 35, regrade!!??"
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Starting Today - T210s | alsup2311 | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 3 | 08-22-2011 04:35 PM |
1934 Goudey SGC finish your set! | JasonD08 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 01-12-2011 08:16 PM |
FS: 1953 Topps Starter Set (20) - All SGC + bonus - SOLD | Irwin Fletcher | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 12-20-2010 08:55 PM |
T206 for Sale: Almost 50% of set, 220 cards | Julian Wells | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 08-01-2010 04:42 PM |
SGC T205s (mostly 10s, 20s) for Sale | obcbobd | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 8 | 02-26-2010 08:18 AM |