|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
At some point, in my opinion, stuff is so de minimis as to be unimportant. I don't think Leon's playing word or definition games here, I think he's just of the view -- as am I, and Barry, and others I assume -- that it's trivial.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I can't wait to bid on that Moeller card 6 months from now in a PWCC auction, graded a PSA 8.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Is it okay because there is no surface gloss on a T206? If this was on a 1989 Upper Deck Ken Griffey Jr would erasing the pencil still be okay?
This goes to the detectable/undetectable issue as well as the additional damage to the card issue. Does it matter based on the value of the card? If it is alteration on a Baltimore Ruth to remove the pencil mark, shouldn't it be the same on a $50 card? If the intent is to only remove the pencil mark, it doesn't meet the standard definition of conservation, so I would still call it alteration. Full dislosure: I used a bad eraser to try and remove a price off the 1939 Cobb HOF postcard, but once it started smearing I left the price on it. PSA graded it a 4 with no qualifiers. It should have, at a minimum, got a 4(MK).
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
OK Peter I will play. Is it trivial to you because of the value or because 90%+ of T206 cards have had something done to them?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
If it wasn’t on the card when it was originally printed then it’s not a problem to remove it.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
What about Cracker jacks...they weren't printed with the stains on them...this occurred in the box? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How about this scenario Pete: You're sorting your raw T-206's on the kitchen table when you decide to take a break for lunch. While eating your meatball hero you spill tomato sauce all over your green Cobb. Is it ethical to remove the sauce off the card?
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Is that even possible to remove the ragoooo?????
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Tomato sauce would blend well into a red Cobb, but not so well with a greenie. Maybe pesto would be better.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: T206 Only Moeller Sovereign SGC 80 remains. SOLD | Thromdog | T206 cards B/S/T | 1 | 05-23-2018 05:29 AM |
Erasing a light pencil mark, altering in a negative manner? | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 06-13-2012 08:05 AM |
T206 dan moeller psa 7!! Only 2 graded higher!! | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-30-2010 03:20 PM |
If if wasnt for that darn pencil mark/stain/paperloss... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-22-2007 05:11 PM |
Does erasing a pencil mark make a card ungradable if the erasing is apparent? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-20-2005 11:47 AM |