![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I suppose there could be an argument that he thought it was more important to keep them grouped with the other Coupons since they shared the same fronts as T213-2 and T213-3. But I also wonder if he might have reconsidered had he realized T213-1 was printed earlier during the T206 time frame.
__________________
T201 (50/50) T205 (208/208) T206 (520/520) T207 (200/200) E90-1 (118/121) E90-3 (20/20) E91A/B/C (96/99) E93 (17/30) E95/96 (26/55) C59-61 (149/248) N28/N29 A&G (84/100) 1901-02 Ogden Tabs (1,327/1,560) 1933-41 Goudey (265/478) 1939-41 Play Ball (381/473) Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, K4, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225, W512, W513, W542, W552, W565, Dozens of smaller uncategorized sets Founder: www.prewarcards.com |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Until the American Card Catalog is rewritten they will remain T213-1. It doesn't matter what anyone says, it is what it is. Some things in the English language don't make perfect sense either. Maybe Burdick should have made them T206s but he clearly didn't. They are simply T213-1, Coupons.
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Put me in the they are T206's camp. There's just too many similarities for them not to be.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi, Ted, Happy Holidays. This topic reminds me of standing before a Shakespeare class and explaining that 'Shakespeare' is just a pen name. It makes the crowd upset.
My only concern in this post is the theory about paper loss on the back. I have not noticed a pattern of paper loss on the ones I have. Take care, all.
__________________
Want to buy or trade for T213-1 (Bob Rhoades) Other Louisiana issues T216 T215 T214 T213 Etc |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Rob Happy Holidays to you....and, I got a ![]() Here is another one of my cards with a back problem. This one, though, only has cardboard residue on it from being pasted on a cigarette carton. Which I'd say proves my theory that some of these 1910 COUPON cards were pasted on the COUPON Cigarette cartons. ![]() ![]() TED Z T206 Reference . |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Was wondering the same thing
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Any given day on ebay you can dial up T213 Coupon cards, and you will typically find approx. 200 cards listed. The majority
of them will be T213-2 cards. And, on the average as many as 20 % of them will be T213-3 cards. Very seldom will you find even one "T213-1" card listed for sale. It's obvious to me the 1910 COUPON cards were not designed to be inserted in the standard (10-cigarette) pack of that era. My theory is they were either...... simply handed out to customers purchasing this new ATC brand, or pasted on a 200-count cigarette cartons,, or just placed inside one of these cartons. In any event, this Willett was most likely the latter case. As it is the best looking 1910 COUPON card in my collection. ![]() ![]() Collecting these cards, I have noticed that approx. 10 % (or perhaps as much as 15 %) of them have this type of paper loss on their backs (which most likely resulted because these cards pasted on cigarette cartons). The repetitive spot-like spoilage on these cards is too consistent to blame it on some random cause. ![]() ![]() This one, though, has faint cardboard residue on it from also being pasted on a cigarette carton. Apparently, whoever removed this card from a carton did it very, very carefully. I've seen very few 1910 COUPON cards (less than 1%) exhibiting this type of minimal back damage. ![]() ![]() TED Z T206 Reference . |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I appreciate your very concise response regarding this matter of the 1910 COUPON cards. Thanks, TED Z T206 Reference . |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
no they are not t206s
but always fun to discuss for the fiftieth time Last edited by RedsFan1941; 12-27-2018 at 08:22 AM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Of course they aren't. Burdick looked at the cards, they all had similar fronts but not exact and had the same brand of cigarette on the back. No other T206 ad back group has the characteristics of the T213 Coupon set. Or show me one with a blue caption or on paper stock.
![]() This is a quote from Burdick on the series, and found in the ACC- "T213- Baseball Series. Coupon Cigarettes, designs of T206. 2 types, names in brown as NO. T206 or name in blue. On card or heavy paper. Issued 1914-1915 and includes Federal League. Many team changes. Name in blue value .35" He knew they were similar but didn't make them T206, it really is as easy as that. They shoulda, woulda, coulda have been something else. But alas, they aren't .
__________________
Leon Luckey Last edited by Leon; 12-27-2018 at 08:38 AM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by ullmandds; 12-27-2018 at 08:55 AM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Anyhow, it's obvious to me that the American Litho (ALC) artist designed these 5 backs (which include the 1910 COUPON back) during the T206 timeline (circa Spring/Summer 1910). A - B - C - C - D connection ![]() ![]() ![]() And, at some later date another ALC artist designed these COUPON backs for the T213-2 (circa 1914-1916) and T213-3 (circa 1916-1919) sets...… ![]() ![]() . . . . . . . . ![]() ![]() So, please explain your comment.....because I don't get it ? TED Z T206 Reference . |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
please explain how you ‘know’ the doolan was pasted to a carton?
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey Ted
Nothing personal just fun debate. Just like I said, there is no other T206 brand on paper like stock and no T206 brand with cards with blue, as well as brown, captions. I am not sure how anyone can't see that Burdick took T206 into account when giving Coupons their T213 designation.
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am always a little curious when someone is questioning another person about something, and the answer is "Just because it was always done that way".
We have much more information about these early cards than Burdick had available to him. If we can show that Burdick was wrong, then maybe his info should be corrected. I'm not sure how to go about updating the ACC, but there should be a way to make it happen. I'm sure there are other mistakes that Burdick made, and there are also inconsistencies with the set designations. I posted this is another thread: Since I collect Coupons, I have always wondered why the Coupons are listed as 1910-1919, Types 1, 2, and 3. Using that logic, shouldn't Goudey's be listed as 1933 through 1941 Types 1, 2, etc.? Playball 1939-1941 Types 1, 2, and 3? Burdick isn't the only one who has some errors in their information. If you look at Lew Lipset's Encyclopedia and carefully look at the New Orleans cards, you will see some minor errors. The designation of the T213-1's really doesn't matter, but it is fun, and interesting to read other peoples opinions. ![]() Rick
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Also of the t216's...one of the three is printed on thin paper...yet it's still a T216 Kotton?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interesting trivia about 1910 COUPON (T213-1) cards...show us some of these rare gems | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 112 | 05-31-2021 06:33 AM |
FYI....1910 COUPON checklist (T213-1) | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 09-03-2014 09:22 PM |
FS: 1910 T213-1 Type 1 Coupon | usernamealreadytaken | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 07-20-2012 03:16 PM |
F/S....1910 COUPON (T213-1) cards | tedzan | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-21-2011 01:58 PM |
T213-1 (1910 Type 1 Coupon) | usernamealreadytaken | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 11-02-2011 08:18 AM |